The effect of ivabradine therapy on dilated cardiomyopathy patients with congestive heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Juntao Yang, Tingting Lv, Jiedong Zhou, Hui Lin, Bingjie Zhao, Haifei Lou, Hanxuan Liu, Tao Zhang, Hangyuan Guo, Jufang Chi
Author Information
  1. Juntao Yang: School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
  2. Tingting Lv: School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
  3. Jiedong Zhou: School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
  4. Hui Lin: Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital (Lihuili Hospital Affiliated to Ningbo University), Ningbo, China.
  5. Bingjie Zhao: School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
  6. Haifei Lou: Department of Cardiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
  7. Hanxuan Liu: School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
  8. Tao Zhang: School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
  9. Hangyuan Guo: School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China.
  10. Jufang Chi: Department of Cardiology, Zhuji People's Hospital, Zhuji, China.

Abstract

Background: Ivabradine improves cardiac function in patients with heart failure, but its effect on dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the efficacy and potential mechanisms of Ivabradine's effect on cardiac function and prognosis in patients with DCM.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and four registers through September 28, 2022. All controlled trials of Ivabradine for the treatment of DCM with congestive heart failure were included. Articles were limited to English, with the full text and necessary data available. We performed random- or fixed effects meta-analyses for all included outcome measures and compared the effect sizes for outcomes in patients treated with and without Ivabradine. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2.0).
Findings: Five trials with 357 participants were included. The pooled risk ratio was 0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.18, 1.25)] for all-cause mortality and 0.38 [95% CI (0.12, 1.23)] for cardiac mortality. The pooled mean difference was -15.95 [95% CI (-19.97, -11.92)] for resting heart rate, 3.96 [95% CI (0.99, 6.93)] for systolic blood pressure, 2.93 [95% CI (2.09, 3.77)] for left ventricular ejection fraction, -5.90 [95% CI (-9.36, -2.44)] for left ventricular end-systolic diameter, -3.41 [95% CI (-5.24, -1.58)] for left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, -0.81 [95% CI (-1.00, -0.62)] for left ventricular end-systolic volume, -0.67 [95% CI (-0.86, -0.48)] for left ventricular end-diastolic volume, -11.01 [95% CI (-19.66, -2.35)] for Minnesota Living with heart failure score, and -0.52 [95% CI (-0.73, -0.31)] for New York Heart Association class.
Interpretation: Ivabradine reduces heart rate and ventricular volume, and improves cardiac function in patients with DCM, but showed no significant effect on the prognosis of patients.

Keywords

References

  1. J Cell Physiol. 2019 Feb;234(2):1925-1936 [PMID: 30067872]
  2. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jun 2;150(11):784-94 [PMID: 19487713]
  3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;11:CD013004 [PMID: 33147368]
  4. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  5. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Dec;40(6):1443-1453 [PMID: 30173307]
  6. Circulation. 2017 Jul 11;136(2):215-231 [PMID: 28696268]
  7. Curr Top Med Chem. 2019;19(21):1878-1901 [PMID: 31400267]
  8. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2016 Mar;31(2):204-8 [PMID: 26720333]
  9. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 3;70(14):1777-1784 [PMID: 28958335]
  10. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160 [PMID: 33781993]
  11. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 May 9;5(1):32 [PMID: 31073128]
  12. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021 Sep 29;2021:1257283 [PMID: 34630844]
  13. Cardiol J. 2015;22(2):227-32 [PMID: 25179314]
  14. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014 Jun 03;8:689-700 [PMID: 24940047]
  15. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013 Jan;102(1):11-22 [PMID: 22575988]
  16. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Sep;10(9):531-47 [PMID: 23900355]
  17. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 23;10:1232404 [PMID: 37680560]
  18. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 15;10(20): [PMID: 34682854]
  19. Lancet. 2011 Mar 19;377(9770):1011-8 [PMID: 21411136]
  20. J Card Fail. 2007 May;13(4):269-74 [PMID: 17517346]
  21. Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):400-414 [PMID: 28190577]
  22. J Cell Physiol. 2014 Jun;229(6):813-23 [PMID: 24590965]
  23. Lancet. 2010 Sep 11;376(9744):875-85 [PMID: 20801500]
  24. Lancet. 2010 Sep 11;376(9744):886-94 [PMID: 20801495]
  25. Circulation. 2016 May 24;133(21):2066-75 [PMID: 27217432]
  26. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 01;24(3): [PMID: 36769115]
  27. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jun 28;67(25):2996-3010 [PMID: 27339497]
  28. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2018 Jul 04;9(11):199-207 [PMID: 30364460]
  29. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898 [PMID: 31462531]
  30. J Intern Med. 2019 Oct;286(4):362-372 [PMID: 31132311]
  31. Lancet. 2008 Sep 6;372(9641):807-16 [PMID: 18757088]
  32. Int J Cardiol. 2019 Apr 1;280:99-103 [PMID: 30686494]
  33. Circ J. 2011;75(2):229-36 [PMID: 21041970]
  34. Pharmacotherapy. 2020 Jun;40(6):544-564 [PMID: 32248556]
  35. J Immunol Res. 2016;2016:6949320 [PMID: 27822484]
  36. Heart Rhythm. 2021 Jul;18(7):1230-1238 [PMID: 33737235]
  37. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Sep 5;70(10):1262-1272 [PMID: 28859790]
  38. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 May 24;2(3):e000150 [PMID: 23709563]
  39. Eur Heart J. 2011 Oct;32(19):2395-404 [PMID: 21875859]
  40. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;19(11):1495-1503 [PMID: 28462519]
  41. Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39 [PMID: 33499930]
  42. Indian Heart J. 2018 Mar - Apr;70(2):246-251 [PMID: 29716702]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0[95%CI]-0heartpatients0ventricularcardiaceffectleftfunctionDCMivabradinefailuredilatedcardiomyopathytrialsincludedratevolumeIvabradineimprovesperformedsystematicreviewmeta-analysisprognosisCochranecongestivepooled481mortality-19-113932-5-2end-systolicdiameter-1end-diastolicHeartBackground:remainsunclearstudyefficacypotentialmechanismsivabradine'sMethods:searchedPubMedLibraryEmbaseWebSciencefourregistersSeptember282022controlledtreatmentArticleslimitedEnglishfulltextnecessarydataavailablerandom-fixedeffectsmeta-analysesoutcomemeasurescomparedsizesoutcomestreatedwithoutqualitystudiesassessedusingrisk-of-biastoolrandomizedRoB2Findings:Five357participantsriskratioconfidenceinterval1825all-cause381223meandifference-15959792resting96996systolicbloodpressure0977ejectionfraction90-93644-34124588100626786016635MinnesotaLivingFailurescore527331NewYorkAssociationclassInterpretation:reducesshowedsignificanttherapyfailure:

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)