Complex effects of chytrid parasites on the growth of the cyanobacterium Planktothrix rubescens across interacting temperature and light gradients.

Joren Wierenga, Mridul K Thomas, Ravi Ranjan, Bas W Ibelings
Author Information
  1. Joren Wierenga: Department F.A. Forel for Environmental and Aquatic Sciences and Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  2. Mridul K Thomas: Department F.A. Forel for Environmental and Aquatic Sciences and Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. mridul.thomas@unige.ch. ORCID
  3. Ravi Ranjan: Helmholtz Institute of Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg (HIFMB), Ammerländer Heerstraße 231, D-26129, Oldenburg, Germany.
  4. Bas W Ibelings: Department F.A. Forel for Environmental and Aquatic Sciences and Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. ORCID

Abstract

Chytrids are important drivers of aquatic ecosystems as phytoplankton parasites. The interaction between these parasites and their hosts are shaped by abiotic factors such as temperature and light. Here, we performed a full-factorial experiment to study how temperature and light interact to affect the dynamics of the bloom-forming toxic cyanobacterium Planktothrix rubescens and its chytrid parasite. We used a dynamic host-parasite model to explore how temperature and light affect long term dynamics. At low temperatures, chytrids do not survive. Higher light and temperature levels stimulated both phytoplankton and chytrid growth, with complex effects on their dynamics. Model exploration indicates that increasing temperature and light shifts equilibrium outcomes from P. rubescens persisting alone to stable coexistence and then to limit cycles. This provides an alternative biological explanation for why P. rubescens is mainly found in the relatively cold and dark lake metalimnion - it may enable avoidance of its parasite. Our study emphasizes the importance of investigating how abiotic factors interact with biotic interactions to drive complex outcomes.

References

  1. Parasitology. 2020 Sep;147(11):1206-1215 [PMID: 32513337]
  2. New Phytol. 2002 Nov;156(2):225-239 [PMID: 33873282]
  3. Environ Microbiol. 2013 Mar;15(3):837-47 [PMID: 23046213]
  4. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Jul;54(7):1668-72 [PMID: 16347677]
  5. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 26;8(8):e71737 [PMID: 23990982]
  6. J Plankton Res. 2021 Aug 31;43(5):658-672 [PMID: 34588922]
  7. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 Dec 11;87(5): [PMID: 33310722]
  8. Environ Microbiol. 2017 Oct;19(10):3802-3822 [PMID: 28618196]
  9. Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 13;6:35039 [PMID: 27733762]
  10. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 22;6:23248 [PMID: 27003279]
  11. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;619:45-103 [PMID: 18461765]
  12. New Phytol. 2005 Nov;168(2):365-76 [PMID: 16219076]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Feb 28;103(9):3165-70 [PMID: 16481617]
  14. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Feb;77(4):1344-51 [PMID: 21169434]
  15. New Phytol. 2000 May;146(2):301-316 [PMID: 33862979]
  16. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 20;7(1):6056 [PMID: 28729657]
  17. Ecology. 2020 Jan;101(1):e02900 [PMID: 31544240]
  18. Toxicon. 2004 Mar 1;43(3):279-85 [PMID: 15033326]
  19. Mol Ecol. 2012 Nov;21(21):5151-4 [PMID: 23075064]
  20. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 29;10(12):e0145559 [PMID: 26714010]
  21. Front Microbiol. 2015 May 12;6:446 [PMID: 26029187]
  22. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Apr;79(8):2642-7 [PMID: 23396340]
  23. Front Microbiol. 2012 Oct 12;3:361 [PMID: 23091469]
  24. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Jun 22;274(1617):1561-6 [PMID: 17439852]
  25. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018 Aug;16(8):471-483 [PMID: 29946124]
  26. Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jan;22(1):299-309 [PMID: 26488235]
  27. Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Jan 5;55(1):44-64 [PMID: 33334098]
  28. Math Biosci Eng. 2018 Dec 24;16(1):516-537 [PMID: 30674130]
  29. Harmful Algae. 2016 Apr;54:69-86 [PMID: 27307781]

Grants

  1. 31003A_166260/Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation)

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0temperaturelightrubescensparasitesdynamicschytridphytoplanktonabioticfactorsstudyinteractaffectcyanobacteriumPlanktothrixparasitegrowthcomplexeffectsoutcomesPChytridsimportantdriversaquaticecosystemsinteractionhostsshapedperformedfull-factorialexperimentbloom-formingtoxicuseddynamichost-parasitemodelexplorelongtermlowtemperatureschytridssurviveHigherlevelsstimulatedModelexplorationindicatesincreasingshiftsequilibriumpersistingalonestablecoexistencelimitcyclesprovidesalternativebiologicalexplanationmainlyfoundrelativelycolddarklakemetalimnion-mayenableavoidanceemphasizesimportanceinvestigatingbioticinteractionsdriveComplexacrossinteractinggradients

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)