Formative assessments during COVID-19 pandemic: an observational study on performance and experiences of medical students.

Vanessa Lavallard, Bernard Cerutti, Marie-Claude Audétat-Voirol, Barbara Broers, Julia Sader, Annick Galetto-Lacour, Stéphane Hausmann, Georges L Savoldelli, Mathieu Nendaz, Monica Escher
Author Information
  1. Vanessa Lavallard: Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. ORCID
  2. Bernard Cerutti: Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  3. Marie-Claude Audétat-Voirol: Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. ORCID
  4. Barbara Broers: Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  5. Julia Sader: Unit of Development and Research in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  6. Annick Galetto-Lacour: Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  7. Stéphane Hausmann: Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  8. Georges L Savoldelli: Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. ORCID
  9. Mathieu Nendaz: Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. ORCID
  10. Monica Escher: Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. ORCID

Abstract

: Because of COVID-19, the 2020 written medical examinations were replaced by mandatory formative online assessments. This study aimed to determine students' performance, self-assessment of performance, and perception about the switch from a summative to a formative approach. : Medical students from year 2 to 5 (n=648) were included. They could repeat each test once or twice. They rated their performance after each attempt and were then given their score. Detailed feedback was given at the end of the session. An online survey determined medical students' perception about the reorganization of education. Two items concerned the switch from summative to formative assessments : Formative assessments involved 2385 examinees totaling 3197 attempts. Among examinees, 30.8% made at least 2 attempts. Scores increased significantly at the second attempt (median 9.4, IQR 10.8), and duration decreased (median -31.0, IQR 48.0). More than half of examinees (54.6%) underestimated their score, female students more often than male. Low performers overestimated, while high performers underestimated their scores. Students approved of the switch to formative assessments. Stress was lessened but motivation for learning decreased. : Medical students' better scores at a second attempt support a benefit of detailed feedback, learning time and re-test opportunity on performance. Decreased learning motivation and a minority of students repeating the formative assessments point to the positive influence of summative assessment on learning.

Keywords

Associated Data

figshare | 10.6084/m9.figshare.21755882

References

  1. Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Nov;116:107934 [PMID: 37595505]
  2. Med Educ. 2017 Feb;51(2):184-195 [PMID: 28084052]
  3. Acad Med. 2005 Oct;80(10 Suppl):S46-54 [PMID: 16199457]
  4. Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):249-55 [PMID: 16507066]
  5. Med Educ. 2002 Sep;36(9):800-4 [PMID: 12354241]
  6. Acad Med. 2013 Jan;88(1):44-8 [PMID: 23165273]
  7. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e042378 [PMID: 33154063]
  8. Adv Physiol Educ. 2021 Mar 1;45(1):84-88 [PMID: 33529145]
  9. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Sep;72(3):374-81 [PMID: 18656322]
  10. Med Teach. 2017 Sep;39(9):954-958 [PMID: 28521573]
  11. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Apr;34(4):552-9 [PMID: 23931928]
  12. Med Teach. 2008;30(2):124-45 [PMID: 18464136]
  13. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jan;15(1):20-7 [PMID: 20951630]
  14. Med Educ. 2005 Mar;39(3):309-17 [PMID: 15733167]
  15. PLoS One. 2021 Sep 21;16(9):e0257394 [PMID: 34547031]
  16. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Dec 16;21(1):620 [PMID: 34915888]
  17. Acad Med. 1991 Dec;66(12):762-9 [PMID: 1750956]
  18. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Aug;449:34-8 [PMID: 16735869]
  19. Anat Sci Educ. 2020 May;13(3):284-300 [PMID: 32306555]
  20. Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1785680 [PMID: 32594865]
  21. Med Teach. 2011;33(6):478-85 [PMID: 21609177]
  22. Med Educ. 2018 Jun;52(6):592-604 [PMID: 29417600]
  23. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Jan;14(1):4-58 [PMID: 26173288]
  24. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jul;84(1):3-9 [PMID: 20708898]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0assessmentsformativeperformance:medicalstudentslearningCOVID-19students'switchsummativeattempteducationexamineesonlinestudyperceptionMedical2givenscorefeedbackFormativeattemptssecondmedianIQRdecreased0underestimatedperformersscoresmotivationassessment2020writtenexaminationsreplacedmandatoryaimeddetermineself-assessmentapproachyear5n=648includedrepeattesttwiceratedDetailedendsessionsurveydeterminedreorganizationTwoitemsconcernedinvolved2385totaling3197Among308%madeleastScoresincreasedsignificantly94108duration-3148half546%femaleoftenmaleLowoverestimatedhighStudentsapprovedStresslessenedbettersupportbenefitdetailedtimere-testopportunityDecreasedminorityrepeatingpointpositiveinfluencepandemic:observationalexperiencesdistance

Similar Articles

Cited By