Emotions and courtship help bonded pairs cooperate, but emotional agents are vulnerable to deceit.

Suzanne Sadedin, Edgar A Duéñez-Guzmán, Joel Z Leibo
Author Information
  1. Suzanne Sadedin: Independent Researcher, Abbots Langley WD5 0QS, United Kingdom. ORCID
  2. Edgar A Duéñez-Guzmán: Google DeepMind, London EC4A 3TW, United Kingdom. ORCID
  3. Joel Z Leibo: Google DeepMind, London EC4A 3TW, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Coordinated pair bonds are common in birds and also occur in many other taxa. How do animals solve the social dilemmas they face in coordinating with a partner? We developed an evolutionary model to explore this question, based on observations that a) neuroendocrine feedback provides emotional bookkeeping which is thought to play a key role in vertebrate social bonds and b) these bonds are developed and maintained via courtship interactions that include low-stakes social dilemmas. Using agent-based simulation, we found that emotional bookkeeping and courtship sustained cooperation in the iterated prisoner's dilemma in noisy environments, especially when combined. However, when deceitful defection was possible at low cost, courtship often increased cooperation, whereas emotional bookkeeping decreased it.

Keywords

References

  1. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):473-516 [PMID: 2402152]
  2. Behav Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 20;44:e59 [PMID: 32814608]
  3. J Theor Biol. 2014 Mar 7;344:49-55 [PMID: 24316108]
  4. PeerJ. 2016 Jan 05;4:e1488 [PMID: 26839737]
  5. Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 05;5:1258 [PMID: 25414681]
  6. Horm Behav. 2021 Nov;136:105062 [PMID: 34601430]
  7. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015 Jun;3:38-44 [PMID: 26146650]
  8. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 May;92(2):665-672 [PMID: 26733357]
  9. J Theor Biol. 2009 Jan 7;256(1):1-13 [PMID: 18955065]
  10. Physiol Behav. 2015 Nov 1;151:246-51 [PMID: 26232089]
  11. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 May;81(5 Pt 2):057102 [PMID: 20866357]
  12. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jun 22;269(1497):1253-61 [PMID: 12065042]
  13. Curr Biol. 2007 Jun 5;17(11):R406-7 [PMID: 17550763]
  14. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 8;12(3):e0172655 [PMID: 28273111]
  15. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016 Nov;91(4):1020-1035 [PMID: 26118820]
  16. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2020 Feb;60:1-11 [PMID: 31791006]
  17. Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 04;11:1370 [PMID: 32848962]
  18. Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 22;282(1819): [PMID: 26582031]
  19. Physiology (Bethesda). 2006 Apr;21:146-52 [PMID: 16565480]
  20. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Oct 20;2(10):e140 [PMID: 17054392]
  21. Horm Behav. 2012 Mar;61(3):239-50 [PMID: 22269661]
  22. Behav Ecol. 2017 Jul-Aug;28(4):1142-1148 [PMID: 29622926]
  23. Int J Psychol. 2017 Apr;52(2):163-170 [PMID: 26354082]
  24. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Dec;107:370-387 [PMID: 31557550]
  25. Am J Primatol. 2009 Oct;71(10):884-8 [PMID: 19492309]
  26. J Evol Biol. 2013 May;26(5):963-70 [PMID: 23496797]
  27. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0189969 [PMID: 29320525]
  28. Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2013;8:1-12 [PMID: 25893030]
  29. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Aug 22;271(1549):1693-9 [PMID: 15306289]
  30. Neuropharmacology. 1989 Apr;28(4):411-8 [PMID: 2546087]
  31. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Nov;19(11):643-654 [PMID: 30301953]
  32. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jun;207:103083 [PMID: 32422420]
  33. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 17;110(38):15348-53 [PMID: 24003115]
  34. J Comp Psychol. 2018 Nov;132(4):432-436 [PMID: 30451526]
  35. Am J Primatol. 2016 Mar;78(3):340-54 [PMID: 25864507]
  36. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2010 Jan-Feb;18(1):1-21 [PMID: 20047458]
  37. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jun 7;273(1592):1375-83 [PMID: 16777726]
  38. Physiol Behav. 2011 Mar 1;102(3-4):296-303 [PMID: 21112347]
  39. Science. 2016 Jan 22;351(6271):375-8 [PMID: 26798013]
  40. Theor Popul Biol. 1987 Aug;32(1):1-14 [PMID: 3660272]
  41. Science. 1981 Mar 27;211(4489):1390-6 [PMID: 7466396]
  42. J Theor Biol. 1993 May 21;162(2):195-228 [PMID: 8412224]
  43. Front Neurosci. 2014 Jun 24;8:171 [PMID: 25009457]
  44. Neuron. 2014 Oct 1;84(1):18-31 [PMID: 25277452]
  45. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 04;9(2):e87955 [PMID: 24504194]
  46. FEBS Lett. 2007 Jun 12;581(14):2575-9 [PMID: 17531984]
  47. Integr Zool. 2018 Nov;13(6):616-633 [PMID: 29851228]
  48. Horm Behav. 2006 Nov;50(4):506-17 [PMID: 16890230]
  49. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Apr 1;13(4):136-40 [PMID: 21238233]
  50. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 7;276(1658):953-60 [PMID: 19129134]
  51. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Aug 29;377(1858):20210050 [PMID: 35858101]
  52. Mol Ecol. 2002 Nov;11(11):2195-212 [PMID: 12406233]
  53. Am Nat. 2015 Feb;185(2):270-80 [PMID: 25616144]
  54. Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1560-3 [PMID: 17158317]
  55. Anim Behav. 2000 Dec;60(6):805-809 [PMID: 11124879]
  56. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2016 Jul 8;39:217-36 [PMID: 27090952]
  57. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 26;377(1860):20210306 [PMID: 35934958]
  58. J Theor Biol. 2020 Oct 21;503:110382 [PMID: 32622790]
  59. Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 19;5:16614 [PMID: 26583485]
  60. Am J Primatol. 2022 Dec;84(12):e23444 [PMID: 36214311]
  61. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):517-46 [PMID: 2402153]
  62. Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 24;287(1929):20200239 [PMID: 32576103]
  63. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 23;280(1755):20122765 [PMID: 23345575]
  64. Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Dec 23;287(1941):20202482 [PMID: 33323080]
  65. J Comp Neurol. 2005 Dec 5;493(1):51-7 [PMID: 16255009]
  66. Brain Behav Immun. 2016 Aug;56:130-9 [PMID: 26902915]
  67. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 7;144(3):379-96 [PMID: 2395377]
  68. Front Robot AI. 2018 Aug 29;5:102 [PMID: 33500981]
  69. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 20;280(1757):20123020 [PMID: 23427172]
  70. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1989;14(1-2):155-61 [PMID: 2525263]
  71. Am Nat. 2014 Jun;183(6):747-61 [PMID: 24823819]
  72. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Sep;24(9):717-733 [PMID: 32561254]
  73. Dev Psychol. 2021 Nov;57(11):1787-1795 [PMID: 34914445]
  74. Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 30;283(1843): [PMID: 27881746]
  75. Evolution. 2015 Mar;69(3):839-47 [PMID: 25529233]
  76. J Avian Biol. 2015 Mar 1;46(2):206-215 [PMID: 25892848]
  77. Nature. 1999 Sep 23;401(6751):368-71 [PMID: 10517633]
  78. Exp Psychol. 2013;60(1):53-63 [PMID: 22935329]
  79. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Feb;11(2):87-91 [PMID: 21237768]

MeSH Term

Animals
Courtship
Cooperative Behavior
Emotions
Prisoner Dilemma
Computer Simulation
Game Theory

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0courtshipemotionalbondssocialbookkeepingcooperationpairdilemmasdevelopeddeceitCoordinatedcommonbirdsalsooccurmanytaxaanimalssolvefacecoordinatingpartner?evolutionarymodelexplorequestionbasedobservationsneuroendocrinefeedbackprovidesthoughtplaykeyrolevertebratebmaintainedviainteractionsincludelow-stakesUsingagent-basedsimulationfoundsustainediteratedprisoner'sdilemmanoisyenvironmentsespeciallycombinedHoweverdeceitfuldefectionpossiblelowcostoftenincreasedwhereasdecreaseditEmotionshelpbondedpairscooperateagentsvulnerableemotionbond

Similar Articles

Cited By