Glimpsing the Future of Animal Welfare through a Bottle of Milk: Insights from Chinese University Students.

Yaoming Liang, Ruiqi Chen, Hongfu Liu, Li Han, Shu Yin
Author Information
  1. Yaoming Liang: College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. ORCID
  2. Ruiqi Chen: College of Economics & Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
  3. Hongfu Liu: College of Economics & Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
  4. Li Han: College of Public Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
  5. Shu Yin: Student Affairs Department (Graduate Student Affairs Department) of the Party Committee, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Abstract

The consumption patterns of university students hold the power to significantly influence market trends. This study illuminates the escalating emphasis on animal welfare in these students' purchasing choices, specifically concerning milk products. Utilizing a discrete choice experiment, we identified a pronounced preference among students for milk products with animal welfare certifications. Students were segmented into three categories based on their motivations: "Quality-Oriented" (20.55%), "Emotionally Intuitive" (30.67%), and "Quality-Emotion Balanced" (48.77%). The "Emotionally Intuitive" group manifested the most robust inclination toward such certifications. Based on these findings, we recommend tailored market strategies targeting these distinct segments. Moreover, our findings emphasize the importance of intensifying animal welfare education, shaping a market aligned with animal welfare principles, and fostering a broader societal environment attuned to animal welfare.

Keywords

References

  1. J Dairy Sci. 2016 Oct;99(10):8304-8313 [PMID: 27474987]
  2. Animals (Basel). 2022 Apr 16;12(8): [PMID: 35454289]
  3. Animal. 2022 Feb;16 Suppl 1:100402 [PMID: 34836808]
  4. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661-77 [PMID: 18620460]
  5. Health Econ. 2012 Feb;21(2):145-72 [PMID: 22223558]
  6. Animals (Basel). 2022 Jan 10;12(2): [PMID: 35049779]
  7. Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 28;11(7): [PMID: 34203442]
  8. Food Res Int. 2021 Mar;141:110006 [PMID: 33641951]
  9. Appetite. 2020 May 1;148:104577 [PMID: 31904389]
  10. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):13-25 [PMID: 29614874]
  11. Nutrition. 2017 Jan;33:322-325 [PMID: 27727008]
  12. Meat Sci. 2023 Jan;195:108994 [PMID: 36240585]
  13. Anim Front. 2023 Feb 23;13(1):26-33 [PMID: 36845609]
  14. Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 06;12(21): [PMID: 36359175]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0animalwelfarestudentsmarketmilkconsumptionuniversityproductsdiscretechoiceexperimentcertificationsStudents"EmotionallyIntuitive"findingspatternsholdpowersignificantlyinfluencetrendsstudyilluminatesescalatingemphasisstudents'purchasingchoicesspecificallyconcerningUtilizingidentifiedpronouncedpreferenceamongsegmentedthreecategoriesbasedmotivations:"Quality-Oriented"2055%3067%"Quality-EmotionBalanced"4877%groupmanifestedrobustinclinationtowardBasedrecommendtailoredstrategiestargetingdistinctsegmentsMoreoveremphasizeimportanceintensifyingeducationshapingalignedprinciplesfosteringbroadersocietalenvironmentattunedGlimpsingFutureAnimalWelfareBottleMilk:InsightsChineseUniversitypreferences

Similar Articles

Cited By