Transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound for assessing posterior pelvic injury and prolapse in postpartum women.

Shuhao Deng, Quan Jiang, Weihong Zhu, Mei Wang, Yuan Zhang
Author Information
  1. Shuhao Deng: Department of Ultrasound, Pudong New Area Peoples' Hospital Shanghai 202199, China.
  2. Quan Jiang: Department of Ultrasound, Pudong New Area Peoples' Hospital Shanghai 202199, China.
  3. Weihong Zhu: Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Pudong New Area Peoples' Hospital Shanghai 202199, China.
  4. Mei Wang: Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Pudong New Area Peoples' Hospital Shanghai 202199, China.
  5. Yuan Zhang: Department of Ultrasound, Pudong New Area Peoples' Hospital Shanghai 202199, China.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound findings and posterior pelvic injury and prolapse in postpartum women.
METHODS: A total of 108 postpartum women received treatment from January 2020 and December 2022 were divided into 2 groups, with 53 cases in a pelvic floor disorder (PFD) group and 55 cases in the no PFD group according to whether they developed PFD after delivery. The relationship between ultrasound data and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) scores was analyzed by Pearson correlation. The diagnostic value of transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound for PFD was analyzed by using the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the relationship between transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound parameters and PFD was analyzed by using the RR hazard ratio.
RESULTS: The distance from the bladder neck to the posterior inferior border of the pubic symphysis, the distance from the cervix to the posterior inferior border of the pubic symphysis, and the shortening rate during retraction were shorter or lower in the PFD group than those in the no PFD group. Additionally, bladder descent, cervical subluxation, urethral rotation, anterior and posterior diameters of the static levator ani muscle (LAM), anterior and posterior diameters of the retracted LAM, anterior and posterior diameters of the LAM in the maximal Valsalva maneuver, and PFDI-20 scores in the PFD group were longer or higher than those of the no PFD group (P<0.01). Shortening rate during retraction, bladder descent, cervical subluxation, urethral rotation, and elongation at maximal Valsalva maneuver were positively correlated with the PFDI-20 score (R = 0.027, 0.053, 0.102, 0.002, 0.011, 0.123, respectively, all P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The degree of bladder descent, cervical subluxation, urethral rotation, shortening rate during retraction, and elongation at maximal Valsalva maneuver are closely related to the PFD I-20 score.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;60(1):58-81 [PMID: 28005595]
  2. BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1109-1116 [PMID: 29512316]
  3. Curr Probl Surg. 2017 Jan;54(1):11-32 [PMID: 28212818]
  4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):164-171 [PMID: 26348380]
  5. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Sep;37(7):2271-2272 [PMID: 30106223]
  6. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(5):346-54 [PMID: 27171318]
  7. Life (Basel). 2021 Dec 14;11(12): [PMID: 34947928]
  8. Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Jan;31(1):15-33 [PMID: 31485686]
  9. Pediatr Radiol. 2020 Dec;50(13):1810-1829 [PMID: 33252751]
  10. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Jun;40(5):1217-1260 [PMID: 33844342]
  11. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Mar;299(3):609-623 [PMID: 30649605]
  12. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jul;214:50-55 [PMID: 28477524]
  13. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):327-338 [PMID: 29332252]
  14. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Feb;26(2):195-200 [PMID: 24866279]
  15. Invest Radiol. 2020 Feb;55(2):73-83 [PMID: 31503082]
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 20;118(16): [PMID: 33853947]
  17. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Oct 22;100(42):e27236 [PMID: 34678860]
  18. Int J Womens Health. 2018 Apr 17;10:195-201 [PMID: 29713205]
  19. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Sep;30(9):1401-1411 [PMID: 31079196]
  20. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jan 13;102(2):e32611 [PMID: 36637923]
  21. Urol Oncol. 2020 May;38(5):354-371 [PMID: 31882228]
  22. Eur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):2067-2085 [PMID: 27488850]
  23. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):173-187 [PMID: 34977950]
  24. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct;60(4):559-569 [PMID: 35633511]
  25. J Sex Med. 2021 Apr;18(4):665-697 [PMID: 33612417]
  26. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Jun 05;10(6): [PMID: 32517067]
  27. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Oct;265:143-149 [PMID: 34492609]
  28. Vet Pathol. 2021 Jan;58(1):10-33 [PMID: 33016246]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pelvicPFDposteriorfloorultrasoundgroup0postpartumwomenbladdertransperinealinjuryprolapsePFDI-20analyzedrateretractiondescentcervicalsubluxationurethralrotationanteriordiametersLAMmaximalValsalvamaneuvercasesrelationshipscoresusingdistanceinferiorborderpubicsymphysisshorteningP<0elongationscoreTransperinealOBJECTIVE:analyzeassociationfindingsMETHODS:total108receivedtreatmentJanuary2020December2022divided2groups53disorder55accordingwhetherdevelopeddeliverydataPelvicFloorDistressInventoryPearsoncorrelationdiagnosticvaluereceiveroperatingcharacteristiccurveparametersRRhazardratioRESULTS:neckcervixshorterlowerAdditionallystaticlevatoranimuscleretractedlongerhigher01ShorteningpositivelycorrelatedR=027053102002011123respectively05CONCLUSIONS:degreecloselyrelatedI-20assessingfunction

Similar Articles

Cited By