A different approach to teaching pre-clerkship students physical diagnosis: standardized patient instructor-senior medical student teaching teams.

Audrey Spelde, Benjamin Blatt, Karen L Lewis, Jennifer L Owens, Larrie Greenberg
Author Information
  1. Audrey Spelde: The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 9109 Fall River Ln, Potomac, Md, 20854, USA.
  2. Benjamin Blatt: The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 9109 Fall River Ln, Potomac, Md, 20854, USA.
  3. Karen L Lewis: The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 9109 Fall River Ln, Potomac, Md, 20854, USA.
  4. Jennifer L Owens: The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 9109 Fall River Ln, Potomac, Md, 20854, USA.
  5. Larrie Greenberg: The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 9109 Fall River Ln, Potomac, Md, 20854, USA. lgreenbe@gwu.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Faculty have traditionally taught the physical examination (PE) to novice medical students (pre-clerkship students.), despite recruiting and cost issues and problems standardizing their approach.
ACTIVITY: We present a model using standardized patient instructor (SPI)-fourth year medical student (MS4) teams to teach PE to pre-clerkship students, leveraging the benefits of co-teaching and peer-assisted learning.
RESULTS: Surveys of pre-clerkship students, MS4s and SPIs indicate positive perceptions of the program, including MS4s reporting significant growth in their professional identities as educators. Pre-clerkship students' performance on the spring clinical skills exams was equivalent to or better than their peer performance pre-program implementation.
IMPLICATIONS: SPI-MS4 teams can effectively teach novice students the mechanics and clinical context of the beginners' physical exam.

Keywords

References

  1. Med Teach. 2009 Jun;31(6):487-92 [PMID: 19811163]
  2. J Interprof Care. 2006 Dec;20(6):577-89 [PMID: 17095437]
  3. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 Feb;12(1):7-18 [PMID: 17041788]
  4. J Interprof Care. 2003 Feb;17(1):45-55 [PMID: 12772469]
  5. Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1725-31 [PMID: 20881824]
  6. Fam Med. 2006 May;38(5):326-9 [PMID: 16673193]
  7. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Nov 1;117(9):757-65 [PMID: 1343207]
  8. J Hosp Med. 2012 Oct;7(8):640-3 [PMID: 22791266]
  9. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):591-9 [PMID: 17922354]
  10. Med Educ. 2009 Aug;43(8):729-40 [PMID: 19659486]
  11. Acad Med. 1998 Feb;73(2):198-200 [PMID: 9484194]
  12. MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Jun 10;12:10411 [PMID: 31008191]
  13. Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1757883 [PMID: 32352355]
  14. Acad Med. 1994 Jul;69(7):567-70 [PMID: 8018268]
  15. Acad Med. 2014 Mar;89(3):436-42 [PMID: 24448049]
  16. Med Teach. 1979;1(5):244-51 [PMID: 24483263]
  17. Acad Med. 1990 Dec;65(12):733-4 [PMID: 2252487]
  18. Acad Med. 2006 Oct;81(10 Suppl):S95-7 [PMID: 17001147]
  19. Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):411-419 [PMID: 28497991]

MeSH Term

Humans
Students, Medical
Physical Examination
Educational Personnel
Clinical Competence
Faculty
Clinical Clerkship
Teaching

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studentspre-clerkshipphysicalmedicalteamsPEnoviceapproachstandardizedpatientstudentteachMS4sPre-clerkshipperformanceclinicalexamteachingPhysicalBACKGROUND:FacultytraditionallytaughtexaminationdespiterecruitingcostissuesproblemsstandardizingACTIVITY:presentmodelusinginstructorSPI-fourthyearMS4leveragingbenefitsco-teachingpeer-assistedlearningRESULTS:SurveysSPIsindicatepositiveperceptionsprogramincludingreportingsignificantgrowthprofessionalidentitieseducatorsstudents'springskillsexamsequivalentbetterpeerpre-programimplementationIMPLICATIONS:SPI-MS4caneffectivelymechanicscontextbeginners'differentdiagnosis:instructor-seniorCo-teachingMedicalteachersdiagnosisinstructionStandardizedpatients

Similar Articles

Cited By