Molecular subtyping in endometrial cancer: A promising strategy to guide fertility preservation.

Christian Dagher, Beryl Manning-Geist, Lora H Ellenson, Britta Weigelt, Eric Rios-Doria, Danika Barry, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum, Mario M Leitao, Jennifer J Mueller
Author Information
  1. Christian Dagher: Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  2. Beryl Manning-Geist: Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  3. Lora H Ellenson: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  4. Britta Weigelt: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  5. Eric Rios-Doria: Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
  6. Danika Barry: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  7. Nadeem R Abu-Rustum: Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
  8. Mario M Leitao: Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
  9. Jennifer J Mueller: Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: muellerj@mskcc.org.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association of molecular subtype with progesterone response in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH).
METHODS: Premenopausal patients aged ���48 years with tumor-normal sequencing data who received progesterone for EC/AEH from 1/1/2010-6/30/2021 were identified. tumors were classified as POLE-ultramutated, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), copy number-high (CN-H), or copy number-low (CN-L) molecular subtype. Best response to progesterone was compared by subtype. Appropriate statistical tests were performed.
RESULTS: Of 20 patients, 7 (35%) had AEH and 13 (65%) had EC. Sixteen tumors (80%) were CN-L, 3 (15%) were MSI-H, and 1 (5%) was POLE-ultramutated. Median time on progesterone was 22 months (range, 3-115). Ten patients (50%) had complete response (CR); median time to CR was 9 months (range, 3-32). Four patients (20%) had stable disease (SD) and 6 (30%) had progressive disease (PD). For CN-L tumors, 10 patients (62%) had CR, 3 (19%) had SD, and 3 (19%) had PD. For MSI-H tumors, 1 patient (33%) had SD and 2 (66%) had PD. For POLE-ultramutated tumors, 1 patient had PD. Median follow-up was 48 months (range, 12-123). Four of 10 patients (40%) with CR recurred; median time from CR to recurrence was 16 months (range, 5-102).
CONCLUSION: Molecular subtype may be associated with progesterone response in patients with EC/AEH. CN-L tumors had the best response, and MSI-H tumors had the poorest. Recurrence after CR is common, and close surveillance is warranted. Larger studies investigating the role of molecular classification in medical management of EC/AEH are needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Feb 25;23(5): [PMID: 35269674]
  2. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jul;174:106-113 [PMID: 37172410]
  3. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;162(2):383-394 [PMID: 37337978]
  4. Mol Endocrinol. 2007 Oct;21(10):2427-39 [PMID: 17609434]
  5. Mol Endocrinol. 2005 Aug;19(8):1978-90 [PMID: 15845746]
  6. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):7-14 [PMID: 23743459]
  7. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 1;27(9):2613-2623 [PMID: 33602681]
  8. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 03;24(1): [PMID: 36614253]
  9. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48 [PMID: 36633525]
  10. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 May;42(5):561-568 [PMID: 29505428]
  11. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May;125(2):477-82 [PMID: 22245711]
  12. J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jul;31(4):e51 [PMID: 32266800]
  13. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Sep;240:220-225 [PMID: 31326637]
  14. Cancer. 2017 Mar 1;123(5):802-813 [PMID: 28061006]
  15. Front Oncol. 2020 Aug 25;10:1437 [PMID: 32983972]
  16. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 07;13(11): [PMID: 34200374]
  17. Mod Pathol. 2022 Sep;35(9):1269-1278 [PMID: 35365770]
  18. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Jul;63(4):417-431 [PMID: 32689770]
  19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb;224(2):191.e1-191.e15 [PMID: 32805208]
  20. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023 Mar;15(1):3-23 [PMID: 37010330]
  21. Hum Reprod. 2007 Jul;22(7):1953-8 [PMID: 17449880]
  22. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr;113(1):105-8 [PMID: 19167049]
  23. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Aug 01;19(8):888-895 [PMID: 34416706]
  24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):370.e1-370.e13 [PMID: 33039397]
  25. Adv Biol Regul. 2014 Jan;54:176-96 [PMID: 24169510]
  26. BJOG. 2017 Sep;124(10):1576-1583 [PMID: 28128512]
  27. Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):464-472 [PMID: 26657901]
  28. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Nov 7;32(11):1361-1362 [PMID: 36167435]
  29. Ann Oncol. 2011 Mar;22(3):643-649 [PMID: 20876910]
  30. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Jul;174:262-272 [PMID: 37245486]
  31. Mol Endocrinol. 2003 Apr;17(4):575-88 [PMID: 12554765]
  32. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Mar;270:50-89 [PMID: 35065448]
  33. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Oct 3;28(19):4302-4311 [PMID: 35849120]
  34. Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jun;161(3):795-801 [PMID: 33812697]
  35. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Dec;31(12):1506-1507 [PMID: 34785521]
  36. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Mar;114(2):287-99 [PMID: 18425577]
  37. Mod Pathol. 2021 May;34(5):994-1007 [PMID: 33328602]
  38. J Mol Diagn. 2015 May;17(3):251-64 [PMID: 25801821]

Grants

  1. P30 CA008748/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Female
Humans
Fertility Preservation
Progesterone
Treatment Outcome
Endometrial Neoplasms
Endometrial Hyperplasia
Microsatellite Instability
Retrospective Studies

Chemicals

Progesterone

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientstumorsCRsubtypeprogesteroneresponseendometrialMSI-HCN-LrangePDmolecularEC/AEHPOLE-ultramutated31timeSDMolecularcancerEChyperplasiaAEHcopyMedianmedianFourdisease1019%patientOBJECTIVES:investigateassociationatypicalMETHODS:Premenopausalaged���48 yearstumor-normalsequencingdatareceived1/1/2010-6/30/2021identifiedTumorsclassifiedmicrosatelliteinstability-highnumber-highCN-Hnumber-lowBestcomparedAppropriatestatisticaltestsperformedRESULTS:20735%1365%Sixteen80%15%5%22 months3-115Ten50%complete9 months3-3220%stable630%progressive62%33%266%follow-up48 months12-12340%recurredrecurrence16 months5-102CONCLUSION:mayassociatedbestpoorestRecurrencecommonclosesurveillancewarrantedLargerstudiesinvestigatingroleclassificationmedicalmanagementneededsubtypingcancer:promisingstrategyguidefertilitypreservationAtypicalEndometrialFertilitysparingProgesterone

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)