[Scientific integrity faces plagiarism fabricated with the ChatGPT].

Horacio Rivera
Author Information
  1. Horacio Rivera: Universidad de Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Biología Molecular y Genómica. Guadalajara, Jalisco, México. ORCID

Abstract

Among the malpractices that undermine research integrity, plagiarism is a major threat given its frequency and evolving presentations. Plagiarism implies the intentional grabbing of texts, ideas, images, or data belonging to others and without crediting them. However, the different and even masked forms of plagiarism often difficult a clear identification. Currently, the many kinds of fraud and plagiarism account for most retractions in traditional and open access journals. Further, the rate of retracted articles is higher in the Latin American databases LILACS and Scielo than in PubMed and Web of Science. This difference has been related to the typical laxity of our culture and the lack of English writing skills of non-Anglophone researchers. These features explain the conflict experienced by Latin American students in USA where they face a stricter culture regarding academic and scientific plagiarism. In the internet era, the ease of accessing scientific literature has increased the temptation to plagiarize but this ethical breach has been countered by antiplagiarism software. Now, the so-called "paraphragiarism" prompted by paraphrasing tools exceeds the infamous "copy-paste". For instance, the innovative ChatGPT can be used for plagiarizing and paraphragiarizing. Moreover, its inclusion as coauthor in scientific papers has been banned by prestigious journals and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors because such chatbot cannot meet the required public responsibility criterium. To avoid plagiarism, it is enough to always give due credit in the proper way. Lastly, I question the ill-fated and now prevailing conjunction of blind faith in progress and zero skepticism that prevents us from foreseeing the negative consequences of technological advances.

Keywords

References

  1. Account Res. 2023 Jan 25;:1-9 [PMID: 36697395]
  2. Crit Care. 2023 Feb 25;27(1):75 [PMID: 36841840]
  3. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2015 Jan-Feb;53(1):53-4 [PMID: 25826823]
  4. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2019;91(2):e20180196 [PMID: 31038533]
  5. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2014 Mar-Apr;52(2):182-7 [PMID: 24758857]
  6. J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Oct 11;36(39):e247 [PMID: 34636502]
  7. Account Res. 2013;20(1):1-4 [PMID: 23281580]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17028-33 [PMID: 23027971]
  9. J Bioeth Inq. 2015 Mar;12(1):21-3 [PMID: 25711208]
  10. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2019 Jan 28;56(5):438-439 [PMID: 30777409]
  11. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2014 Dec 15;15(2):151-4 [PMID: 25574267]
  12. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1118-1121 [PMID: 33970185]
  13. Nature. 2023 Feb;614(7948):581-583 [PMID: 36781962]
  14. Account Res. 2023 Jan 15;:1-19 [PMID: 36469621]
  15. Nature. 2023 Feb;614(7947):224-226 [PMID: 36737653]
  16. Reumatologia. 2021;59(3):132-137 [PMID: 34538939]
  17. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):855-868 [PMID: 29516389]
  18. Nature. 2023 Jun;618(7964):222-223 [PMID: 37258739]
  19. Account Res. 2023 Dec;30(7):407-438 [PMID: 34937464]
  20. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Oct;22(5):1447-1456 [PMID: 26520642]
  21. Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Jul 7;28(4):31 [PMID: 35796841]
  22. Patterns (N Y). 2023 Mar 10;4(3):100706 [PMID: 36960451]
  23. J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Mar;13(1):7-9 [PMID: 26780105]
  24. Urol Oncol. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):104-8 [PMID: 21194646]
  25. EMBO Rep. 2008 Aug;9(8):700-2 [PMID: 18670438]

MeSH Term

Humans
Plagiarism
Research Personnel
Scientific Misconduct

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0plagiarismscientificintegrityPlagiarismjournalsLatinAmericancultureChatGPTArtificialAmongmalpracticesundermineresearchmajorthreatgivenfrequencyevolvingpresentationsimpliesintentionalgrabbingtextsideasimagesdatabelongingotherswithoutcreditingHoweverdifferentevenmaskedformsoftendifficultclearidentificationCurrentlymanykindsfraudaccountretractionstraditionalopenaccessrateretractedarticleshigherdatabasesLILACSScieloPubMedWebSciencedifferencerelatedtypicallaxitylackEnglishwritingskillsnon-AnglophoneresearchersfeaturesexplainconflictexperiencedstudentsUSAfacestricterregardingacademicinterneteraeaseaccessingliteratureincreasedtemptationplagiarizeethicalbreachcounteredantiplagiarismsoftwareNowso-called"paraphragiarism"promptedparaphrasingtoolsexceedsinfamous"copy-paste"instanceinnovativecanusedplagiarizingparaphragiarizingMoreoverinclusioncoauthorpapersbannedprestigiousInternationalCommitteeMedicalJournalEditorschatbotmeetrequiredpublicresponsibilitycriteriumavoidenoughalwaysgiveduecreditproperwayLastlyquestionill-fatednowprevailingconjunctionblindfaithprogresszeroskepticismpreventsusforeseeingnegativeconsequencestechnologicaladvances[ScientificfacesfabricatedChatGPT]ScientificIntegrityReviewIntelligenceRevisióndeIntegridadCientíficaPlagioInteligencia

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.