Association of diet and lifestyle factors with semen quality in male partners of Chinese couples preparing for pregnancy.

Hanran Mai, Junyi Ke, Zilin Zheng, Jieyi Luo, Miaomiao Li, Yanxia Qu, Fan Jiang, Simian Cai, Liandong Zuo
Author Information
  1. Hanran Mai: Department of Clinical Biological Resource Bank, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
  2. Junyi Ke: Department of Clinical Biological Resource Bank, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
  3. Zilin Zheng: Department of Clinical Biological Resource Bank, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
  4. Jieyi Luo: Department of Clinical Biological Resource Bank, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
  5. Miaomiao Li: Department of Clinical Biological Resource Bank, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
  6. Yanxia Qu: Department of Gynecology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
  7. Fan Jiang: Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, Guangdong, China.
  8. Simian Cai: Department of Science, Education and Data Management, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, Guangdong, China.
  9. Liandong Zuo: Department of Andrology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 9 Jinsui Road, Guangzhou, 510623, Guangdong, China. zuold@163.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Semen quality significantly influences conception, and its preservation is crucial for couples seeking pregnancy. We investigated dietary and lifestyle risk factors impacting semen quality.
METHODS: A total of 466 males from the Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center's pre-pregnancy consultation clinic were recruited between January 2021 and March 2023 for inclusion. Semen analysis was performed, and diet and lifestyle data were gathered via questionnaire. Logistic regression was utilized to examine the link between diet, lifestyle variables, and semen quality.
RESULTS: Smoking worsened progressive sperm motility (38.0% vs. 36.0%, t = 2.262; P = 0.049). Alcohol consumption impaired progressive motility (40.5 ± 17.8% vs. 34.7 ± 16.1%, t = 3.396; P < 0.001) and total motility (56.0% vs. 64.0%; P = 0.001). Using plastic beverage bottles for oil or seasonings lowered sperm concentrations (40.4% vs. 59.0% vs. 65.5%; P = 0.032). A sweet diet correlated with higher total sperm motility (55.0% vs. 60.0%, 62.0% vs. 63.2%; P = 0.017). Higher milk product intake improved sperm concentration (41.610 vs. 63.710 vs. 66.1*10; P = 0.021) and motility (54.5% vs. 56.0% vs. 63.0%; P = 0.033). More frequent egg consumption increased semen volume (3.1 mL vs. 3.8 mL vs. 4.0 mL; P = 0.038). Roughage intake enhanced sperm concentration (160.810 vs. 224.610; P = 0.027), and adequate sleep improved progressive sperm motility rate (35.4% ± 18.2% vs. 40.2 ± 16.3%, F = 3.747; P = 0.024) and total motility (52.7% vs. 61.5%; P = 0.013). The regression model showed that using plastic containers for condiments was a protective factor for semen volume (OR: 0.12; CI 0.03-0.55; P = 0.006), sperm concentration (OR: 0.001, CI 0.00-0.30; P = 0.012), and count (OR: 0.12, CI 0.03-0.48; P = 0.003). Milk and egg consumption were also protective for semen volume (OR: 0.18, CI 0.06-0.51; P = 0.001 and OR: 0.11, CI 0.03-0.55; P = 0.006, respectively), while sufficient sleep benefitted total sperm motility (OR: 0.47, CI 0.24-0.95; P = 0.034).
CONCLUSIONS: Smoking and drinking, type of condiment container, diet preference, sleep duration, and milk, roughage, and egg consumption may reduce semen quality.

Keywords

References

  1. Chemosphere. 2023 Feb;313:137440 [PMID: 36460160]
  2. Hum Reprod. 2009 Jun;24(6):1304-12 [PMID: 19228759]
  3. Nat Rev Urol. 2017 Feb;14(2):120-130 [PMID: 28050014]
  4. J Urol. 2022 Aug;208(2):406-413 [PMID: 35344413]
  5. Urology. 2019 Jan;123:126-132 [PMID: 30300659]
  6. Fertil Steril. 2016 Mar;105(3):590-598.e2 [PMID: 26658132]
  7. Am J Mens Health. 2017 Jul;11(4):1279-1304 [PMID: 27099345]
  8. Fertil Steril. 2018 Sep;110(4):570-577 [PMID: 30196939]
  9. Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Sep 22;2020(3):hoaa040 [PMID: 33005753]
  10. Hum Reprod. 2020 Feb 29;35(2):446-452 [PMID: 32020190]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 29;19(1): [PMID: 35010587]
  12. Curr Urol Rep. 2018 May 17;19(7):56 [PMID: 29774489]
  13. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2020 Sep;93(3):312-321 [PMID: 32362009]
  14. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2022 Feb 17;19(1):13 [PMID: 35177090]
  15. Environ Int. 2023 Feb;172:107769 [PMID: 36709676]
  16. Basic Clin Androl. 2020 Apr 23;30:5 [PMID: 32341784]
  17. Andrology. 2020 Mar;8(2):277-298 [PMID: 31637826]
  18. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2113-7 [PMID: 20117775]
  19. Sports Health. 2022 Jul-Aug;14(4):508-517 [PMID: 34806474]
  20. Urology. 2022 Nov;169:96-101 [PMID: 35944655]
  21. Fertil Steril. 2009 Mar;91(3):812-8 [PMID: 18314116]
  22. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Aug 5;22(1):620 [PMID: 35931982]
  23. Am J Epidemiol. 2013 May 15;177(10):1027-37 [PMID: 23568594]
  24. Fertil Steril. 2016 Mar;105(3):637-644.e1 [PMID: 26696300]
  25. Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):485-503 [PMID: 22611174]
  26. Basic Clin Androl. 2020 Oct 15;30:16 [PMID: 33072332]
  27. Biol Reprod. 2021 Dec 20;105(6):1484-1493 [PMID: 34554205]
  28. Histochem Cell Biol. 2022 Mar;157(3):273-285 [PMID: 35247091]
  29. Nat Sci Sleep. 2022 Apr 02;14:557-566 [PMID: 35401018]
  30. Am J Mens Health. 2017 May;11(3):654-662 [PMID: 27645515]
  31. Andrologia. 2021 Sep;53(8):e14116 [PMID: 33978248]
  32. Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):635-645 [PMID: 27113031]
  33. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jul;238:170-177 [PMID: 31160133]
  34. Int J Reprod Med. 2020 Oct 21;2020:6908458 [PMID: 33150165]
  35. Fertil Steril. 1982 Aug;38(2):255-7 [PMID: 6809501]
  36. J Clin Med. 2020 May 09;9(5): [PMID: 32397485]
  37. Front Physiol. 2022 Feb 22;13:813591 [PMID: 35273518]
  38. Hum Reprod. 2010 Mar;25(3):605-12 [PMID: 20085915]
  39. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Nov;38(11):2965-2974 [PMID: 34554361]
  40. Environ Int. 2020 Feb;135:105368 [PMID: 31830732]
  41. Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2265-75 [PMID: 23670169]
  42. Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1280-7 [PMID: 24636397]
  43. Hum Reprod. 2005 Aug;20(8):2362 [PMID: 16024541]
  44. Acta Clin Croat. ;55(2):301-8 [PMID: 28394547]
  45. World J Mens Health. 2023 Apr;41(2):354-362 [PMID: 36102103]

Grants

  1. China, 202206010100/Guangzhou Medical and Health Technology Projects
  2. China, 20191A011021/Guangzhou Medical and Health Technology Projects
  3. China, 2019A1515012061/Guangdong Natural Science Foundation
  4. China,201904010486/Guangzhou Science and Technology Program Key Projects
  5. China,20211A011034/Guangzhou Health Commission

MeSH Term

Female
Humans
Male
Pregnancy
Diet
Dietary Fiber
East Asian People
Life Style
Semen
Semen Analysis
Sperm Count
Sperm Motility
Spermatozoa

Chemicals

Dietary Fiber

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vsP = 000%spermmotilitysemenqualityOR:CItotaldietlifestylefactorsconsumption001Semenprogressive405%5563concentrationeggvolumesleep03-0couplespregnancyregressionSmoking56plastic2%milkintakeimproved6103protective12006BACKGROUND:significantlyinfluencesconceptionpreservationcrucialseekinginvestigateddietaryriskimpactingMETHODS:466malesGuangzhouWomenChildren'sMedicalCenter'spre-pregnancyconsultationclinicrecruitedJanuary2021March2023inclusionanalysisperformeddatagatheredviaquestionnaireLogisticutilizedexaminelinkvariablesRESULTS:worsened3836t = 2262049Alcoholimpaired5 ± 178%347 ± 161%t = 3396P < 064Usingbeveragebottlesoilseasoningsloweredconcentrations4%5965032sweetcorrelatedhigher6062017Higherproduct41710661*1002154033frequentincreased1 mL8 mL40 mL038Roughageenhanced160810224027adequaterate354% ± 182 ± 163%F = 3747024527%61013modelshowedusingcontainerscondimentsfactor00-030012count48003Milkalso1806-05111respectivelysufficientbenefitted4724-095034CONCLUSIONS:drinkingtypecondimentcontainerpreferencedurationroughagemayreduceAssociationmalepartnersChinesepreparingDietLifestyleMalefertility

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)