Barriers and Facilitators for the Donation and Acceptance of Human Breast milk: A Scoping Review.

Edlin Glane Mathias, Divya Sussana Patil, Ashwija Kolakemar, Jisha B Krishnan, Vishnu Renjith, Nachiket Gudi, Ravi Shankar Swamy, Angela Brand
Author Information
  1. Edlin Glane Mathias: Department of Health Information, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
  2. Divya Sussana Patil: Department of Health Information, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
  3. Ashwija Kolakemar: Department of Nephrology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
  4. Jisha B Krishnan: Department of Health Information, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
  5. Vishnu Renjith: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
  6. Nachiket Gudi: Department of Health Information, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. gudi.nachiket@manipal.edu.
  7. Ravi Shankar Swamy: Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  8. Angela Brand: Department of Health Information, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Human milk is the best source of nutrients for all infants. When a mother's own milk is unavailable, the World Health Organization suggests using donor human milk for premature neonates with or without medical complications. Exploring the barriers and facilitators for breast milk donation and its acceptability is essential for developing this intervention. A scoping review was conducted based on a methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley (Int J Soc Res Methodol 8:19-32, 2005). A search was conducted in PubMed (NCBI), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Web of Science (Elsevier). A two-stage sequential screening process was adopted. Data extraction was done using a piloted data extraction form.
RECENT FINDINGS: We included 20 articles for narrative synthesis. Barriers and facilitators for donating and accepting breast milk were categorized under six themes: individual, family, community, workplace, health system, and policy-related. The common individual barriers were time requirements for BMD, personal dislike of the process, lack of knowledge, insufficient milk, negative opinions, and lack of information. Family stigma, negative rumors, less educated family members, and illness of a family member were identified as family-related barriers. Community-related barriers include cultural or religious unacceptable practices, societal taboos, and distance to milk banks. The major barriers identified in relation to the health system were lack of practical and psychological support, lack of information, storing and transportation issues, lack of knowledge among HCWs, and logistical challenges of creating a milk lab. The common work-related barriers were the lack of adequate time, philosophical objections, and incomprehension at returning to work. Policy-related barriers identified include the need for hygiene requirements, donation costs, and lack of standardized guidelines. Making the donation process faster, providing pick-up services for donors, and community education and male partner engagement regarding breast milk donation could help to boost the acceptability of breast milk donation.

Keywords

References

  1. Breastfeed Med. 2019 Jun;14(5):298-306 [PMID: 30896254]
  2. J Hum Lact. 2021 Feb;37(1):105-113 [PMID: 33201758]
  3. J Hum Lact. 2018 Aug;34(3):438-447 [PMID: 29723103]
  4. Public Health Nutr. 2022 Feb;25(2):312-322 [PMID: 34509177]
  5. Int Breastfeed J. 2020 Apr 17;15(1):28 [PMID: 32303270]
  6. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  7. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210 [PMID: 27919275]
  8. Lancet. 2023 Feb 11;401(10375):486-502 [PMID: 36764314]
  9. Int Breastfeed J. 2024 Feb 1;19(1):9 [PMID: 38303077]
  10. Lancet. 2023 Feb 11;401(10375):472-485 [PMID: 36764313]
  11. Int Breastfeed J. 2020 Dec 2;15(1):104 [PMID: 33267891]
  12. J Hum Lact. 2007 Nov;23(4):350-7; quiz 358-61 [PMID: 17991801]
  13. Lancet. 2023 Feb 11;401(10375):415-418 [PMID: 36764312]
  14. Adv Neonatal Care. 2019 Dec;19(6):441-451 [PMID: 31764132]
  15. Int Breastfeed J. 2022 Oct 27;17(1):74 [PMID: 36303181]
  16. Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 04;7:53 [PMID: 30886837]
  17. Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Dec;14 Suppl 6:e12606 [PMID: 30592166]
  18. Breastfeed Rev. 2014 Mar;22(1):11-21 [PMID: 24804519]
  19. Collegian. 2014;21(3):239-44 [PMID: 25632719]
  20. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 23;16(10): [PMID: 31126144]
  21. J Hum Lact. 2021 Feb;37(1):87-94 [PMID: 33275499]
  22. J Mother Child. 2022 Apr 01;25(2):86-94 [PMID: 34842395]
  23. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013 Jul;42(4):451-61 [PMID: 23772947]
  24. Paediatr Child Health. 2010 Nov;15(9):595-602 [PMID: 22043143]
  25. J Perinatol. 2015 Feb;35(2):137-41 [PMID: 25254333]
  26. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 May 31;22(1):455 [PMID: 35641919]
  27. J Hum Lact. 2016 May;32(2):229-37 [PMID: 26905342]
  28. Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Jul;17(3):e13131 [PMID: 33403779]
  29. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Mar;32(6):902-905 [PMID: 29046116]
  30. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Nov 30;9(11):5820-5821 [PMID: 33532450]
  31. Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Oct;15(4):e12842 [PMID: 31099159]
  32. Neonatal Netw. 2013 May-Jun;32(3):175-83 [PMID: 23666187]
  33. J Hum Lact. 2016 Aug;32(3):438-45 [PMID: 27207816]
  34. Breastfeed Med. 2018 Dec;13(10):694-701 [PMID: 30383389]
  35. Semin Perinatol. 2021 Mar;45(2):151380 [PMID: 33431112]
  36. Nurs Womens Health. 2012 Jun-Jul;16(3):202-8 [PMID: 22697223]

MeSH Term

Female
Infant, Newborn
Infant
Humans
Male
Milk, Human
Milk Banks
Breast Feeding
Mothers
Attitude

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0milkbarrierslackdonationbreastprocessfamilyidentifiedHumanusingfacilitatorsacceptabilityconductedextractionBarriersindividualcommunityhealthsystemcommontimerequirementsknowledgenegativeinformationincludeDonationAcceptanceBreastPURPOSEOFREVIEW:bestsourcenutrientsinfantsmother'sunavailableWorldHealthOrganizationsuggestsdonorhumanprematureneonateswithoutmedicalcomplicationsExploringessentialdevelopinginterventionscopingreviewbasedmethodologicalframeworkdevelopedArkseyO'MalleyIntJSocResMethodol8:19-322005searchPubMedNCBICINAHLEBSCOWebScienceElseviertwo-stagesequentialscreeningadoptedDatadonepiloteddataformRECENTFINDINGS:included20articlesnarrativesynthesisdonatingacceptingcategorizedsixthemes:workplacepolicy-relatedBMDpersonaldislikeinsufficientopinionsFamilystigmarumorslesseducatedmembersillnessmemberfamily-relatedCommunity-relatedculturalreligiousunacceptablepracticessocietaltaboosdistancebanksmajorrelationpracticalpsychologicalsupportstoringtransportationissuesamongHCWslogisticalchallengescreatinglabwork-relatedadequatephilosophicalobjectionsincomprehensionreturningworkPolicy-relatedneedhygienecostsstandardizedguidelinesMakingfasterprovidingpick-upservicesdonorseducationmalepartnerengagementregardinghelpboostFacilitatorsmilk:ScopingReviewBreastfeedingInfantMilkbankNewborn

Similar Articles

Cited By