The Impact of Sex, Body Mass Index, Age, Exercise Type and Exercise Duration on Interstitial Glucose Levels during Exercise.

Ninoschka C D'Souza, Durmalouk Kesibi, Christopher Yeung, Dorsa Shakeri, Ashwin I D'Souza, Alison K Macpherson, Michael C Riddell
Author Information
  1. Ninoschka C D'Souza: School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada. ORCID
  2. Durmalouk Kesibi: School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
  3. Christopher Yeung: School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
  4. Dorsa Shakeri: School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
  5. Ashwin I D'Souza: The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada. ORCID
  6. Alison K Macpherson: School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
  7. Michael C Riddell: School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada. ORCID

Abstract

The impact of age, sex and body mass index on interstitial glucose levels as measured via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during exercise in the healthy population is largely unexplored. We conducted a multivariable generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis on CGM data (Dexcom G6, 10 days) collected from 119 healthy exercising individuals using CGM with the following specified covariates: age; sex; BMI; exercise type and duration. Females had lower postexercise glycemia as compared with males (92 ± 18 vs. 100 ± 20 mg/dL, = 0.04) and a greater change in glycemia during exercise from pre- to postexercise ( = 0.001) or from pre-exercise to glucose nadir during exercise ( = 0.009). Younger individuals (i.e., <20 yrs) had higher glucose during exercise as compared with all other age groups (all < 0.05) and less CGM data in the hypoglycemic range (<70 mg/dL) as compared with those aged 20-39 yrs ( < 0.05). Those who were underweight, based on body mass index (BMI: <18.5 kg/m), had higher pre-exercise glycemia than the healthy BMI group (104 ± 20 vs. 97 ± 17 mg/dL, = 0.02) but similar glucose levels after exercise. Resistance exercise was associated with less of a drop in glycemia as compared with aerobic or mixed forms of exercise ( = 0.008) and resulted in a lower percent of time in the hypoglycemic ( = 0.04) or hyperglycemic (glucose > 140 mg/dL) ( = 0.03) ranges. In summary, various factors such as age, sex and exercise type appear to have subtle but potentially important influence on CGM measurements during exercise in healthy individuals.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Jan;122(1):29-70 [PMID: 34550468]
  2. Eur Endocrinol. 2014 Feb;10(1):36-42 [PMID: 29872462]
  3. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015 Apr 27;6:61 [PMID: 25964778]
  4. Diabetologia. 2017 Jan;60(1):3-6 [PMID: 27872948]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Mar;111(2):207-224 [PMID: 30677137]
  6. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2022 Feb 1;29(1):10-16 [PMID: 34845158]
  7. Diabetes Care. 2023 Apr 1;46(4):704-713 [PMID: 36795053]
  8. N Z Med J. 1983 May 25;96(732):407 [PMID: 6573613]
  9. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Aug;105(2):725-33 [PMID: 18420724]
  10. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2023 Sep 25;: [PMID: 37748202]
  11. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018 Jun;43(6):541-552 [PMID: 29420905]
  12. Diabetologia. 2021 Oct;64(10):2138-2146 [PMID: 34296322]
  13. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603 [PMID: 31177185]
  14. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Mar;92(3):1125-32 [PMID: 11842049]
  15. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Oct 1;104(10):4356-4364 [PMID: 31127824]
  16. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2014 Jul;43(4):535-40 [PMID: 25199277]
  17. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Oct 24;6(10):e11181 [PMID: 30355561]
  18. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Jun;10(3):149-59 [PMID: 18473688]
  19. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 05;22(5): [PMID: 35271177]
  20. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Aug;95(2):584-90 [PMID: 12716874]
  21. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990 Jan;68(1):302-8 [PMID: 2179207]
  22. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Nov 15;9:674 [PMID: 30524371]
  23. J Phys Act Health. 2011 May;8(4):457-67 [PMID: 21597117]
  24. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2002 Dec;12(4):398-413 [PMID: 12500984]
  25. Int J Sports Med. 1999 May;20(4):227-31 [PMID: 10376478]
  26. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1297-9 [PMID: 20215454]
  27. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Jun;100(6):1883-94 [PMID: 16714415]
  28. Eur J Sport Sci. 2019 Sep;19(8):1140-1149 [PMID: 30776253]
  29. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Jun;280(6):E908-17 [PMID: 11350772]
  30. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Aug;92(4-5):462-9 [PMID: 15138838]
  31. Eur J Sport Sci. 2023 Oct;23(10):2109-2117 [PMID: 36715137]
  32. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2019 Jul 24;18:100202 [PMID: 31428564]
  33. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Apr;96(4):1331-40 [PMID: 14660506]
  34. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Jul 25;:19322968221113341 [PMID: 35876145]
  35. Sports Med. 2023 Sep 2;: [PMID: 37658967]
  36. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 25;20(15): [PMID: 37568982]
  37. Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):583-4 [PMID: 18071003]
  38. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;22(9): [PMID: 35590794]
  39. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 May;15(3):593-599 [PMID: 32064911]
  40. Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1631-1640 [PMID: 29162583]
  41. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Jul;42(7):1314-23 [PMID: 20019632]
  42. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 25;23(17): [PMID: 37687871]
  43. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Feb;21(2):66-72 [PMID: 30657336]
  44. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;21(2): [PMID: 33445438]
  45. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Jan;296(1):E11-21 [PMID: 18840763]
  46. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 10;21(16): [PMID: 32785124]
  47. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994 Feb;78(2):359-66 [PMID: 7906280]
  48. Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct;36(10):e177 [PMID: 24065851]
  49. JAMA. 2021 Jun 1;325(21):2140-2142 [PMID: 33978710]
  50. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Nov;133:178-192 [PMID: 28965029]
  51. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Apr 23;106(5):e2053-e2062 [PMID: 33512496]
  52. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1991;19:1-40 [PMID: 1936083]

MeSH Term

Male
Female
Humans
Blood Glucose
Hypoglycemia
Body Mass Index
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Hypoglycemic Agents
Hyperglycemia
Glucose

Chemicals

Blood Glucose
Hypoglycemic Agents
Glucose

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exercise0glucose=CGMagehealthyglycemiacompared±mg/dLsexindividualsBMIExercisebodymassindexlevelscontinuousmonitoringdatatypelowerpostexercisevs2004pre-exerciseyrshigher<05lesshypoglycemicimpactinterstitialmeasuredviapopulationlargelyunexploredconductedmultivariablegeneralizedestimatingequationGEEanalysisDexcomG610dayscollected119exercisingusingfollowingspecifiedcovariates:durationFemalesmales9218100greaterchangepre-001nadir009Youngerie<20groupsrange<70aged20-39underweightbasedBMI:<185kg/mgroup104971702similarResistanceassociateddropaerobicmixedforms008resultedpercenttimehyperglycemic>14003rangessummaryvariousfactorsappearsubtlepotentiallyimportantinfluencemeasurementsImpactSexBodyMassIndexAgeTypeDurationInterstitialGlucoseLevelshyperglycemiahypoglycemia

Similar Articles

Cited By