COVID-19 pandemic and capital markets: the role of government responses.

Christian Beer, Janine Maniora, Christiane Pott
Author Information
  1. Christian Beer: TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany. ORCID
  2. Janine Maniora: Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  3. Christiane Pott: TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the moderation effect of government responses on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, proxied by the daily growth in COVID-19 cases and deaths, on the capital market, i.e., the S&P 500 firm's daily returns. Using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker, we monitor 16 daily indicators for government actions across the fields of containment and closure, economic support, and health for 180 countries in the period from January 1, 2020 to March 15, 2021. We find that government responses mitigate the negative stock market impact and that investors' sentiment is sensitive to a firm's country-specific revenue exposure to COVID-19. Our findings indicate that the mitigation effect is stronger for firms that are highly exposed to COVID-19 on the sales side. In more detail, containment and closure policies and economic support mitigate negative stock market impacts, while health system policies support further declines. For firms with high revenue exposure to COVID-19, the mitigation effect is stronger for government economic support and health system initiatives. Containment and closure policies do not mitigate stock price declines due to growing COVID-19 case numbers. Our results hold even after estimating the spread of the pandemic with an epidemiological standard model, namely, the susceptible-infectious-recovered model.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 20;12:708537 [PMID: 34354650]
  2. J R Soc Interface. 2012 Aug 7;9(73):1797-808 [PMID: 22337627]
  3. Adv Dis Control Prev. 2017;2(1):1-7 [PMID: 28845481]
  4. Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538 [PMID: 33686204]
  5. J Behav Exp Finance. 2021 Mar;29:100428 [PMID: 33269212]
  6. J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100341 [PMID: 32427215]
  7. J Bus Finance Account. 2021 Mar-Apr;48(3-4):433-462 [PMID: 34230747]
  8. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101716 [PMID: 32837385]
  9. Int Rev Financ Anal. 2018 Mar;56:153-166 [PMID: 38620259]
  10. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Jul;35:101597 [PMID: 32550842]
  11. Infect Dis Model. 2020 Jan 08;5:129-141 [PMID: 31956741]
  12. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Oct;36:101528 [PMID: 32837360]
  13. Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Oct;57:101419 [PMID: 34744246]
  14. Int Rev Financ Anal. 2020 Oct;71:101546 [PMID: 38620444]
  15. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Jul;35:101512 [PMID: 32562472]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 18;17(8): [PMID: 32325710]
  17. J financ econ. 2021 Aug;141(2):802-830 [PMID: 34580557]
  18. Financ Res Lett. 2020 Oct;36:101671 [PMID: 32837375]
  19. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101838 [PMID: 36569651]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0COVID-19governmentmarketsupportpolicieseffectresponsespandemicdailyclosureeconomichealthmitigatestockrevenueimpactcapitalfirm'sGovernmentcontainmentnegativesentimentexposuremitigationstrongerfirmssystemdeclinesmodelpaperanalyzesmoderationproxiedgrowthcasesdeathsieS&P500returnsUsingOxfordResponseTrackermonitor16indicatorsactionsacrossfields180countriesperiodJanuary12020March152021findinvestors'sensitivecountry-specificfindingsindicatehighlyexposedsalessidedetailimpactshighinitiativesContainmentpriceduegrowingcasenumbersresultsholdevenestimatingspreadepidemiologicalstandardnamelysusceptible-infectious-recoveredmarkets:roleBehavioralfinanceCapitalInvestorSales

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)