Evaluation of the interrelated effects of slaughtering, drying, and defatting methods on the composition and properties of black soldier fly () larvae fat.

Raúl Hurtado-Ribeira, David Villanueva-Bermejo, Mónica R García-Risco, M Dolores Hernández, María José Sánchez-Muros, Tiziana Fornari, Luis Vázquez, Diana Martin
Author Information
  1. Raúl Hurtado-Ribeira: Departamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de La Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), 28049, Madrid, Spain.
  2. David Villanueva-Bermejo: Departamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de La Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), 28049, Madrid, Spain.
  3. Mónica R García-Risco: Departamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de La Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), 28049, Madrid, Spain.
  4. M Dolores Hernández: Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Alimentario (IMIDA), Estación de Acuicultura Marina, Puerto de San Pedro Del Pinatar, 30740, Murcia, Spain.
  5. María José Sánchez-Muros: Department of Applied Biology, CEI3, University of Almería, 04120, Almería, Spain.
  6. Tiziana Fornari: Departamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de La Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), 28049, Madrid, Spain.
  7. Luis Vázquez: Departamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de La Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), 28049, Madrid, Spain.
  8. Diana Martin: Departamento de Producción y Caracterización de Nuevos Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de La Alimentación (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM), 28049, Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

The interrelated effect of different slaughtering, drying and defatting methods of black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) on the lipid composition and properties of the fat was studied. Blanching and freezing were compared as slaughtering methods, oven or freeze-drying as drying methods, and mechanical pressing or supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) as defatting methods. The different modes of slaughtering, drying, and defatting, along with both binary and ternary interactions caused significant effects on processes yields, lipid composition, moisture content and thermal properties. Thus, considering the defatting degree and the yield in total valued products (defatted meal plus fat), the combination of blanching, freeze-drying plus mechanical pressing was the worst option (51.2% and 87.5%, respectively). In contrast, the other combinations demonstrated better and comparable efficiency, although SFE is preferable for defatting (83.2% and 96.9%, respectively). The content of major fatty acids (lauric, palmitic and myristic acids) was significantly affected by the BSFL treatments, although with unsignificant impact on the total saturated fatty acids content. To preserve the integrity of the fat, the combination of blanching and oven-drying was preferred, as non-thermal methods of slaughtering and drying caused intense lipolysis, releasing free fatty acids (FFA) in the range of 18.6-23.5%. To achieve the lowest moisture content in the fats (≤0.1%), oven-drying with mechanical pressing were desired, regardless of the slaughtering method; while values > 1% were reached for freezing, freeze-drying and SFE. Both differences in FFA and moisture contents caused different thermal behaviors in the samples. Specially, the melting temperature was lower for samples with higher FFA and moisture contents, with a notable difference when freezing, freeze-drying and SFE were combined (14.5 °C vs 30.6 °C, as the mean value for the rest of samples). The different modes of processing did not affect the minor lipid compounds. Therefore, the modes employed for slaughtering, drying, and defatting of BSFL determine, either individually or in combination, the process yields, composition, and properties of the fat.

Keywords

References

  1. Foods. 2023 Jan 20;12(3): [PMID: 36766019]
  2. Foods. 2022 May 12;11(10): [PMID: 35626970]
  3. Biomolecules. 2020 Jun 29;10(7): [PMID: 32610700]
  4. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016 Aug;75(3):294-305 [PMID: 26908196]
  5. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2009 Aug;39(8):547-67 [PMID: 19540341]
  6. Foods. 2022 Feb 28;11(5): [PMID: 35267357]
  7. J AOAC Int. 2001 May-Jun;84(3):805-13 [PMID: 11417645]
  8. Insects. 2021 Jul 26;12(8): [PMID: 34442238]
  9. Food Res Int. 2019 Feb;116:276-282 [PMID: 30716946]
  10. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020 Sep;19(5):2747-2763 [PMID: 33336973]
  11. Food Res Int. 2018 Mar;105:812-820 [PMID: 29433277]
  12. Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 12;9(1):10110 [PMID: 31300713]
  13. Heliyon. 2016 Dec 22;2(12):e00218 [PMID: 28054035]
  14. Food Res Int. 2019 Jan;115:116-125 [PMID: 30599922]
  15. Animals (Basel). 2019 Apr 19;9(4): [PMID: 31010233]
  16. J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Apr;99(6):3157-3167 [PMID: 30536393]
  17. Food Chem. 2017 Aug 15;229:28-34 [PMID: 28372175]
  18. Animals (Basel). 2019 Apr 21;9(4): [PMID: 31010069]
  19. J Sci Food Agric. 2017 Jun;97(8):2594-2600 [PMID: 27734508]
  20. PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0263924 [PMID: 35213590]
  21. Insects. 2017 Sep 13;8(3): [PMID: 28902170]
  22. Foods. 2022 Feb 03;11(3): [PMID: 35159605]
  23. Insects. 2023 Apr 08;14(4): [PMID: 37103183]
  24. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2016 Jan 19;3:208 [PMID: 26904538]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0slaughteringdefattingdryingmethodsfatdifferentcompositionpropertiesfreeze-dryingSFEmoisturecontentacidsBSFLlipidfreezingmechanicalpressingmodescausedcombinationfattyFFAsamplesinterrelatedblacksoldierflylarvaeextractioneffectsyieldsthermaltotalplusblanching2%5%respectivelyalthoughoven-dryingcontentseffectstudiedBlanchingcomparedovensupercriticalfluidalongbinaryternaryinteractionssignificantprocessesThusconsideringdegreeyieldvaluedproductsdefattedmealworstoption5187contrastcombinationsdemonstratedbettercomparableefficiencypreferable83969%majorlauricpalmiticmyristicsignificantlyaffectedtreatmentsunsignificantimpactsaturatedpreserveintegritypreferrednon-thermalintenselipolysisreleasingfreerange186-23achievelowestfats≤01%desiredregardlessmethodvalues > 1%reacheddifferencesbehaviorsSpeciallymeltingtemperaturelowerhighernotabledifferencecombined145 °Cvs306 °CmeanvaluerestprocessingaffectminorcompoundsThereforeemployeddetermineeitherindividuallyprocessEvaluationDryingEdibleinsectsFatKillingLipidsLipolysis

Similar Articles

Cited By