Return to Sports Activity After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Hyun Gon Kim, Seung-Ho Kim, Su Cheol Kim, Jong Hun Park, Jae Soo Kim, Bo Taek Kim, Sang Min Lee, Jae Chul Yoo
Author Information
  1. Hyun Gon Kim: Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  2. Seung-Ho Kim: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saeroun Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  3. Su Cheol Kim: Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  4. Jong Hun Park: Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  5. Jae Soo Kim: Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  6. Bo Taek Kim: Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  7. Sang Min Lee: Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  8. Jae Chul Yoo: Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Abstract

Background: There are little published data on return to sports (RTS) after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).
Purpose: To (1) determine the rate and timing of RTS after RTSA in an Asian population, (2) analyze predictive factors for RTS, and (3) determine the relationship between RTS after RTSA and clinical/radiological outcomes.
Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients with diagnosis of irreparable rotator cuff tear (RCT), cuff tear arthropathy (CTA), or degenerative osteoarthritis who underwent RTSA between May 2017 and May 2020. Included were patients who played sports preoperatively in ≤3 years and had ≥2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on responses to a telephone survey about RTS after RTSA: those who returned to sports (group A) and those who did not (group B). Patient characteristics, pre- and postoperative clinical features and functional scores, and radiologic outcomes (acromial fracture, scapular notching, heterotopic ossification, and loosening of humeral and glenoid component) were compared between the groups.
Results: Of 59 eligible patients, 44 patients (28 in group A, 16 in group B) were included. The RTS rate after RTSA was 63.6%, and the mean RTS time was 9.1 months (range, 3-36 months). There was a significant group difference in body mass index (BMI) (group A, 24.3 ± 2.1; group B, 27.1 ± 4.4; = .01) and preoperative diagnosis (CTA/irreparable RCT/degenerative osteoarthritis diagnoses: group A, 13/12/3; group B, 3/6/7; = .03). Patients in group A showed significantly higher forward flexion ( = .03) and higher Simple Shoulder Test score ( = .02) than group B at final clinical follow-up. No significant difference in radiological outcomes was found between the groups.
Conclusion: Patients with a low BMI and those diagnosed with CTA or irreparable RCT were found to have better RTS rates after undergoing RTSA, and forward flexion and Simple Shoulder Test scores at final follow-up were significantly higher in the RTS group, with no significant differences in complications.

Keywords

References

  1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Oct 16;95(20):1877-83 [PMID: 24132362]
  2. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2):281-9 [PMID: 21051242]
  3. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Dec;64(12):1715-20 [PMID: 15843453]
  4. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;18(4):600-6 [PMID: 19481959]
  5. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998 Jul-Aug;7(4):362-7 [PMID: 9752645]
  6. Sports Med. 2006;36(7):571-83 [PMID: 16796395]
  7. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021 Dec;24(4):272-278 [PMID: 34875733]
  8. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Apr;21(4):554-60 [PMID: 21393018]
  9. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Dec;27(12):2145-2152 [PMID: 30093234]
  10. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Mar;23(3):395-400 [PMID: 24129052]
  11. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Dec 1;28(23):e1042-e1048 [PMID: 32345934]
  12. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52 [PMID: 22958838]
  13. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2816-21 [PMID: 26316610]
  14. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):1577-81 [PMID: 18539951]
  15. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jun 10;9(6):23259671211012393 [PMID: 34179208]
  16. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2512-20 [PMID: 21116754]
  17. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Sep;136(9):1189-1193 [PMID: 27388577]
  18. J Orthop Sci. 2022 Jan;27(1):131-138 [PMID: 33500174]
  19. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jun;25(6):920-6 [PMID: 26853758]
  20. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 6;95(21):e160 [PMID: 24196472]
  21. Int Orthop. 2018 May;42(5):1129-1135 [PMID: 29273836]
  22. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Apr;457:124-32 [PMID: 17159574]
  23. Sports Health. 2015 Jan;7(1):87-9 [PMID: 25553218]
  24. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):423-7 [PMID: 25406301]
  25. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;45(7):1664-1669 [PMID: 28319426]
  26. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):243-249 [PMID: 27159289]
  27. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2201-4 [PMID: 19684299]
  28. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 3;92(15):2544-56 [PMID: 21048173]
  29. Clin Sports Med. 2005 Jan;24(1):175-86 [PMID: 15636785]
  30. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Apr;143(4):1809-1816 [PMID: 35092467]
  31. Int Orthop. 2022 Mar;46(3):563-571 [PMID: 35098350]
  32. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Nov;142(11):3427-3436 [PMID: 34564735]
  33. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2022 Sep;25(3):210-216 [PMID: 35971606]
  34. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Jan;(214):160-4 [PMID: 3791738]
  35. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;15(5):527-40 [PMID: 16979046]
  36. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Mar;22(3):396-402 [PMID: 22944077]
  37. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2022 Sep;25(3):202-209 [PMID: 35971607]
  38. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Aug;25(8):e217-22 [PMID: 27068387]
  39. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jan;30(1):216-221 [PMID: 32858195]
  40. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000 Nov-Dec;9(6):507-13 [PMID: 11155304]
  41. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jun;28(6S):S110-S117 [PMID: 31196504]
  42. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep;24(9):1481-5 [PMID: 25958214]
  43. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021 Mar;24(1):42-52 [PMID: 33652512]
  44. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Sep;22(9):1199-208 [PMID: 23385083]
  45. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Feb 1;30(3):e415-e422 [PMID: 34890386]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0groupRTSRTSAB1patients=sportsshoulder23outcomesfollow-upPatientsgroupssignificanthigherShoulderreturnreversetotalarthroplastydetermineratediagnosisirreparablecufftearRCTCTAosteoarthritisMayclinicalscoresmonthsdifferenceBMI±403significantlyforwardflexionSimpleTestfinalfoundBackground:littlepublisheddataPurpose:timingAsianpopulationanalyzepredictivefactorsrelationshipclinical/radiologicalStudyDesign:Case-controlstudyLevelevidenceMethods:retrospectivereviewperformedconsecutiverotatorarthropathydegenerativeunderwent20172020Includedplayedpreoperatively≤3years≥2-yeardividedbasedresponsestelephonesurveyRTSA:returnedPatientcharacteristicspre-postoperativefeaturesfunctionalradiologicacromialfracturescapularnotchingheterotopicossificationlooseninghumeralglenoidcomponentcomparedResults:59eligible442816included636%meantime9range3-36bodymassindex242701preoperativeCTA/irreparableRCT/degenerativediagnoses:13/12/33/6/7showedscore02radiologicalConclusion:lowdiagnosedbetterratesundergoingdifferencescomplicationsReturnSportsActivityReverseTotalArthroplastyphysicalactivitysportreplacement

Similar Articles

Cited By