Younger, not older, children trust an inaccurate human informant more than an inaccurate robot informant.

Xiaoqian Li, W Quin Yow
Author Information
  1. Xiaoqian Li: Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore. ORCID
  2. W Quin Yow: Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore. ORCID

Abstract

This study examined preschoolers' trust toward accurate and inaccurate robot informants versus human informants. Singaporean children aged 3-5 years (N = 120, 57 girls, mostly Asian; data collected from 2017 to 2018) viewed either a robot or a human adult label familiar objects either accurately or inaccurately. Children's trust was assessed by examining their subsequent willingness to accept novel object labels provided by the same informant. Regardless of age, children trusted accurate robots to a similar extent as accurate humans. However, while older children (dis)trusted inaccurate robots and humans comparably, younger children trusted inaccurate robots less than inaccurate humans. The results indicate a developmental change in children's reliance on informants' characteristics to decide whom to trust.

References

  1. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
  2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
  3. Baumann, A.‐E., Goldman, E. J., Meltzer, A., & Poulin‐Dubois, D. (2023). People do not always know best: Preschoolers' trust in social robots. Journal of Cognition and Development., 24, 535–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2023.2178435
  4. Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaat5954.
  5. Birch, S. A., Vauthier, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2008). Three‐ and 4‐year‐olds spontaneously use others' past performance to guide their learning. Cognition, 107, 1018–1034.
  6. Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 167–175.
  7. Breazeal, C., Harris, P. L., DeSteno, D., Westlund, J. M. K., Dickens, L., & Jeong, S. (2016). Young children treat robots as informants. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12192
  8. Brink, K. A., Gray, K., & Wellman, H. M. (2019). Creepiness creeps in: Uncanny valley feelings are acquired in childhood. Child Development, 90, 1202–1214.
  9. Brink, K. A., & Wellman, H. M. (2020). Robot teachers for children? Young children trust robots depending on their perceived accuracy and agency. Developmental Psychology, 56(7), 1268–1277. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000884
  10. Corriveau, K. H., & Harris, P. L. (2009). Choosing your informant: Weighing familiarity and recent accuracy. Developmental Science, 12, 426–437.
  11. Corriveau, K. H., Harris, P. L., Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Arnott, B., Elliott, L., Liddle, B., Hearn, A., Vittorini, L., & De Rosnay, M. (2009). Young children's trust in their mother's claims: Longitudinal links with attachment security in infancy. Child Development, 80(3), 750–761.
  12. Corriveau, K. H., Kinzler, K. D., & Harris, P. L. (2013). Accuracy trumps accent in children's endorsement of object labels. Developmental Psychology, 49, 470–479.
  13. Crivello, C., & Poulin‐Dubois, D. (2019). Infants' ability to detect emotional incongruency: Deep or shallow? Infancy, 24(4), 480–500.
  14. Danovitch, J. H., & Alzahabi, R. (2013). Children show selective trust in technological informants. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14, 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.689391
  15. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three‐factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864–886.
  16. Flanagan, T., Wong, G., & Kushnir, T. (2023). The minds of machines: Children's beliefs about the experiences, thoughts, and morals of familiar interactive technologies. Developmental Psychology, 59, 1017–1031.
  17. Geiskkovitch, D. Y., Thiessen, R., Young, J. E., & Glenwright, M. R. (2019). What? That's not a chair!: How robot informational errors affect children's trust towards robots. In Proceedings of the14th ACM/IEEE international conference on human‐robot interaction (pp. 48–56). IEEE.
  18. Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041‐210X.12504
  19. Gweon, H. (2021). Inferential social learning: Cognitive foundations of human social learning and teaching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(10), 896–910.
  20. Harris, P. L., Koenig, M. A., Corriveau, K. H., & Jaswal, V. K. (2018). Cognitive foundations of learning from testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 251–273.
  21. Horst, J. S., & Hout, M. C. (2016). The Novel Object and Unusual Name (NOUN) database: A collection of novel images for use in experimental research. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1393–1409.
  22. Itakura, S., Ishida, H., Kanda, T., Shimada, Y., Ishiguro, H., & Lee, K. (2008). How to build an intentional android: Infants imitation of a robot's goal‐directed actions. Infancy, 13, 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/15250000802329503
  23. Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446.
  24. Jaswal, V. K., & Kondrad, R. L. (2016). Why children are not always epistemically vigilant: Cognitive limits and social considerations. Child Development Perspectives, 10, 240–244.
  25. Jipson, J. L., & Gelman, S. A. (2007). Robots and rodents: Children's inferences about living and nonliving kinds. Child Development, 78, 1675–1688.
  26. Jipson, J. L., Labotka, D., Callahan, M. A., & Gelman, S. A. (2018). How conversations with parents may help children learn to separate the sheep from the goats (and the robots). In M. M. Saylor & P. Ganea (Eds.), Active learning from infancy to childhood (pp. 189–212). Springer.
  27. Kahn, P. H., Jr., Gary, H. E., & Shen, S. (2013). Children's social relationships with current and near‐future robots. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 32–37.
  28. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human Computer Interaction, 19, 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_4
  29. Kanero, J., Geçkin, V., Oranç, C., Mamus, E., Küntay, A. C., & Göksun, T. (2018). Social robots for early language learning: Current evidence and future directions. Child Development Perspectives, 12, 146–151.
  30. Kim, S., Paulus, M., & Kalish, C. (2017). Young children's reliance on information from inaccurate informants. Cognitive Science, 41, 601–621.
  31. Kinzler, K. D., Corriveau, K. H., & Harris, P. L. (2011). Children's selective trust in native‐accented speakers. Developmental Science, 14(1), 106–111.
  32. Koenig, M. A., Clément, F., & Harris, P. (2004). Trust in testimony: Children's use of true and false statements. Psychological Science, 15, 694–699.
  33. Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. (2005). Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development, 76, 1261–1277.
  34. Kushnir, T., & Koenig, M. A. (2017). What I don't know won't hurt you: The relation between professed ignorance and later knowledge claims. Developmental Psychology, 53, 826–835.
  35. Kushnir, T., Vredenburgh, C., & Schneider, L. A. (2013). “Who can help me fix this toy?” The distinction between causal knowledge and word knowledge guides preschoolers' selective requests for information. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 446–453.
  36. Lakatos, G., Wood, L. J., Zaraki, A., Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Amirabdollahian, F. (2019). Effects of previous exposure on children's perception of a humanoid robot. In M. A. Salichs, S. S. Ge, E. I. Barakova, J.‐J. Cabibihan, A. R. Wagner, A. Castro‐Gonzalez, & H. He (Eds.), Social robotics: proceedings of 11th international conference (pp. 14–23). Springer.
  37. Li, X., & Yow, W. Q. (2018). Willingness to revise own testimony: 3‐ and 4‐year‐olds' selective trust in unexpected testimony from accurate and inaccurate informant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 173, 1–15.
  38. Lucas, A. J., Burdett, E. R., Burgess, V., Wood, L. A., McGuigan, N., Harris, P. L., & Whiten, A. (2017). The development of selective copying: Children's learning from an expert versus their mother. Child Development, 88(6), 2026–2042.
  39. Manzi, F., Peretti, G., Di Dio, C., Cangelosi, A., Itakura, S., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Massaro, D., & Marchetti, A. (2020). A robot is not worth another: Exploring children's mental state attribution to different humanoid robots. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02011
  40. Miller, P. H. (2011). Piaget's theory: Past, present, and future. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley‐Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 649–672). Wiley Blackwell.
  41. Movellan, J., Eckhardt, M., Virnes, M., & Rodriguez, A. (2009). Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human‐robot interaction (pp. 307–308). Association for Computing Machinery.
  42. Nelder, J. A. (2008). What is the mixed‐models controversy? International Statistical Review, 76, 134–139.
  43. Nielsen, M., & Blank, C. (2011). Imitation in young children: When who gets copied is more important than what gets copied. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1050–1053.
  44. Noles, N. S., Danovitch, J. H., & Shafto, P. (2015, July). Children's trust in technological and human informants. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Pasadena, CA.
  45. Oranç, C., & Küntay, A. C. (2020). Children's perception of social robots as a source of information across different domains of knowledge. Cognitive Development, 54, 100875.
  46. Palmquist, C. M., & Jaswal, V. K. (2015). Preschoolers' inferences about pointers and labelers: The modality matters. Cognitive Development, 35, 178–185.
  47. Pasquini, E. S., Corriveau, K. H., Koenig, M., & Harris, P. L. (2007). Preschoolers monitor the relative accuracy of informants. Developmental Psychology, 43(5), 1216–1226.
  48. Peter, J., Kühne, R., & Barco, A. (2021). Can social robots affect children's prosocial behavior? An experimental study on prosocial robot models. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106712
  49. Piaget, J., & Cook, M. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
  50. Powell, M. J. (2009). The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. Report no. DAMTP 2009/NA06, CMS, University of Cambridge.
  51. R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  52. Reifen Tagar, M., Federico, C. M., Lyons, K. E., Ludeke, S., & Koenig, M. A. (2014). Heralding the authoritarian? Orientation toward authority in early childhood. Psychological Science, 25(4), 883–892.
  53. Schleihauf, H., Hoehl, S., Tsvetkova, N., König, A., Mombaur, K., & Pauen, S. (2021). Preschoolers' motivation to over‐imitate humans and robots. Child Development, 92(1), 222–238.
  54. Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2006). Interactive humanoid robots for a science museum. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human‐robot interaction (pp. 305–312). Association for Computing Machinery.
  55. Sobel, D. M., & Kushnir, T. (2013). Knowledge matters: How children evaluate the reliability of testimony as a process of rational inference. Psychological Review, 120, 779–797.
  56. SoftBank Robotics. (2019). Education and research: Educational robots, redefining ‘teach & learn’ for a knowledge‐based economy. https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/industries/education‐ and‐research
  57. Stephens, E. C., & Koenig, M. A. (2015). Varieties of testimony: Children's selective learning in semantic versus episodic domains. Cognition, 137, 182–188.
  58. Stower, R., Calvo‐Barajas, N., Castellano, G., & Kappas, A. (2021). A meta‐analysis on children's trust in social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(8), 1979–2001.
  59. Tong, Y., Wang, F., & Danovitch, J. (2019). The role of epistemic and social characteristics in children's selective trust: Three meta‐analyses. Developmental Science, 23, e12895. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12895
  60. Vanderbilt, K. E., Heyman, G. D., & Liu, D. (2014). In the absence of conflicting testimony young children trust inaccurate informants. Developmental Science, 17, 443–451.
  61. VanderBorght, M., & Jaswal, V. (2009). Who knows best? Preschoolers sometimes prefer child informants over adult informants. Infant and Child Development, 18, 61–71.
  62. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  63. Wang, F., Tong, Y., & Danovitch, J. (2019). Who do I believe? Children's epistemic trust in internet, teacher, and peer informants. Cognitive Development, 50, 248–260.
  64. Weisman, K., Legare, C. H., Smith, R. E., Dzokoto, V. A., Aulino, F., Ng, E., Dulin, J. C., Ross‐Zehnder, N., Brahinsky, J. D., & Luhrmann, T. M. (2021). Similarities and differences in concepts of mental life among adults and children in five cultures. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 1358–1368. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562‐021‐01184‐8
  65. Yang, G.‐Z., Dario, P., & Kragic, D. (2018). Social robotics—Trust, learning, and social interaction. Science Robotics, 3, eaau8839.
  66. Yow, W. Q., & Li, X. (2021). Children consider a speaker's information privilege and engage in adaptive selective trust in referential cues. Cognitive Development, 60, 101118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101118

Grants

  1. /SUTD President's Graduate Fellowship

MeSH Term

Female
Humans
Asian People
Judgment
Robotics
Trust
Male
Child, Preschool

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0inaccuratechildrentrustaccuraterobothumaninformanttrustedrobotshumansinformantseitherolderstudyexaminedpreschoolers'towardversusSingaporeanaged3-5 yearsN = 12057girlsmostlyAsiandatacollected20172018viewedadultlabelfamiliarobjectsaccuratelyinaccuratelyChildren'sassessedexaminingsubsequentwillingnessacceptnovelobjectlabelsprovidedRegardlessagesimilarextentHoweverdiscomparablyyoungerlessresultsindicatedevelopmentalchangechildren'srelianceinformants'characteristicsdecideYounger

Similar Articles

Cited By