u-track3D: Measuring, navigating, and validating dense particle trajectories in three dimensions.

Philippe Roudot, Wesley R Legant, Qiongjing Zou, Kevin M Dean, Tadamoto Isogai, Erik S Welf, Ana F David, Daniel W Gerlich, Reto Fiolka, Eric Betzig, Gaudenz Danuser
Author Information
  1. Philippe Roudot: Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Aix Marseille University, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, I2M, Turing Centre for Living Systems, Marseille, France. Electronic address: philippe.roudot@univ-amu.fr.
  2. Wesley R Legant: Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  3. Qiongjing Zou: Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  4. Kevin M Dean: Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  5. Tadamoto Isogai: Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  6. Erik S Welf: Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  7. Ana F David: Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
  8. Daniel W Gerlich: Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna, Austria.
  9. Reto Fiolka: Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  10. Eric Betzig: Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  11. Gaudenz Danuser: Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: gaudenz.danuser@utsouthwestern.edu.

Abstract

We describe u-track3D, a software package that extends the versatile u-track framework established in 2D to address the specific challenges of 3D particle tracking. First, we present the performance of the new package in quantifying a variety of intracellular dynamics imaged by multiple 3D microcopy platforms and on the standard 3D test dataset of the particle tracking challenge. These analyses indicate that u-track3D presents a tracking solution that is competitive to both conventional and deep-learning-based approaches. We then present the concept of dynamic region of interest (dynROI), which allows an experimenter to interact with dynamic 3D processes in 2D views amenable to visual inspection. Third, we present an estimator of trackability that automatically defines a score for every trajectory, thereby overcoming the challenges of trajectory validation by visual inspection. With these combined strategies, u-track3D provides a complete framework for unbiased studies of molecular processes in complex volumetric sequences.

Keywords

References

  1. Methods. 2017 Feb 15;115:80-90 [PMID: 27713081]
  2. Med Image Anal. 2009 Apr;13(2):325-42 [PMID: 19223219]
  3. Nat Methods. 2014 Mar;11(3):281-9 [PMID: 24441936]
  4. J Microsc. 2007 Mar;225(Pt 3):214-28 [PMID: 17371444]
  5. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Apr 19;14(4):e1006128 [PMID: 29672531]
  6. J Mol Biol. 2019 Mar 29;431(7):1315-1321 [PMID: 30738026]
  7. Elife. 2020 Jun 09;9: [PMID: 32515734]
  8. Bioinformatics. 2020 Dec 8;36(19):4935-4941 [PMID: 32879934]
  9. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2014 Apr;23(4):1844-57 [PMID: 24808351]
  10. Nat Methods. 2016 Dec;13(12):985-988 [PMID: 27776112]
  11. Biophys J. 2015 Jun 16;108(12):2807-15 [PMID: 26083920]
  12. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2015 Nov;24(11):4512-27 [PMID: 26353357]
  13. Bioinformatics. 2020 Mar 1;36(5):1317-1325 [PMID: 31633779]
  14. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2020 Nov;26(11):3241-3254 [PMID: 31180858]
  15. Rep Prog Phys. 2015 Dec;78(12):124601 [PMID: 26511974]
  16. Nat Methods. 2015 Jun;12(6):481-3 [PMID: 26020499]
  17. Nat Methods. 2010 Sep;7(9):761-8 [PMID: 20729842]
  18. Nat Commun. 2014 Jul 11;5:4342 [PMID: 25014658]
  19. Cell. 2014 Mar 13;156(6):1274-1285 [PMID: 24630727]
  20. Science. 2014 Oct 24;346(6208):1257998 [PMID: 25342811]
  21. J Struct Biol. 2011 Nov;176(2):168-84 [PMID: 21821130]
  22. PLoS Biol. 2009 Mar 17;7(3):e57 [PMID: 19296720]
  23. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Jun;27(6):789-804 [PMID: 18541486]
  24. J Cell Biol. 2019 Jul 1;218(7):2150-2168 [PMID: 31113824]
  25. Sci Rep. 2021 May 4;11(1):9465 [PMID: 33947895]
  26. Nat Protoc. 2014 Jan;9(1):193-208 [PMID: 24385149]
  27. Front Bioinform. 2023 Mar 08;3:998991 [PMID: 36969798]
  28. Nat Commun. 2019 Aug 2;10(1):3474 [PMID: 31375678]
  29. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Feb;34(2):415-32 [PMID: 25252280]
  30. Protein Sci. 2021 Jan;30(1):70-82 [PMID: 32881101]
  31. Biophys J. 2016 Mar 29;110(6):1456-65 [PMID: 27028654]
  32. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 23;7(1):9178 [PMID: 28835648]
  33. Cell. 2011 Aug 19;146(4):544-54 [PMID: 21835447]
  34. Nat Methods. 2015 Jun;12(6):480-1 [PMID: 26020498]
  35. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 9;8(1):212 [PMID: 29317715]
  36. Med Image Anal. 2021 Oct;73:102168 [PMID: 34340105]
  37. Med Image Anal. 2021 Aug;72:102128 [PMID: 34229189]
  38. J Cell Biol. 2008 Dec 15;183(6):999-1005 [PMID: 19075110]
  39. Med Image Anal. 2015 Aug;24(1):163-189 [PMID: 26176413]
  40. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017 Nov;26(11):5395-5410 [PMID: 29388914]
  41. J Struct Biol. 2005 Aug;151(2):182-95 [PMID: 16043363]
  42. Biol Imaging. 2023 Nov 13;3:e22 [PMID: 38510174]
  43. Dev Cell. 2013 Aug 12;26(3):279-91 [PMID: 23891661]
  44. Trends Cell Biol. 2015 Dec;25(12):749-759 [PMID: 26603943]
  45. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2020 Jan 13;: [PMID: 31940539]
  46. Science. 2018 Apr 20;360(6386): [PMID: 29674564]
  47. J Cell Biol. 2015 Dec 21;211(6):1103-11 [PMID: 26668328]
  48. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018 Jan;24(1):994-1003 [PMID: 28866520]
  49. Elife. 2018 Mar 29;7: [PMID: 29595475]
  50. Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 21;8:15896 [PMID: 28635963]
  51. Nat Methods. 2008 Aug;5(8):695-702 [PMID: 18641657]
  52. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 May 26;18(1):280 [PMID: 28549411]
  53. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2013 Nov;35(11):2736-3750 [PMID: 24051732]
  54. J Clin Invest. 2015 May;125(5):1927-43 [PMID: 25844900]
  55. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2006 May;15(5):1062-70 [PMID: 16671288]

Grants

  1. RM1 GM145399/NIGMS NIH HHS
  2. R35 GM136428/NIGMS NIH HHS
  3. DP2 GM136653/NIGMS NIH HHS
  4. R35 GM133522/NIGMS NIH HHS
  5. R33 CA235254/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Algorithms
Physical Examination

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.03Dparticletrackingu-track3Dpresentpackageframework2Dchallengesintracellulardynamicsmultiplechallengedynamicprocessesvisualinspectiontrajectorymicroscopydescribesoftwareextendsversatileu-trackestablishedaddressspecificFirstperformancenewquantifyingvarietyimagedmicrocopyplatformsstandardtestdatasetanalysesindicatepresentssolutioncompetitiveconventionaldeep-learning-basedapproachesconceptregioninterestdynROIallowsexperimenterinteractviewsamenableThirdestimatortrackabilityautomaticallydefinesscoreeverytherebyovercomingvalidationcombinedstrategiesprovidescompleteunbiasedstudiesmolecularcomplexvolumetricsequencesu-track3D:MeasuringnavigatingvalidatingdensetrajectoriesthreedimensionsvisualizationCP:Imagingcellbiologyconfocalerrorinferencelight-sheet

Similar Articles

Cited By (12)