Metacognitive Skills Training and Computerized Cognitive Remediation among Individuals with First-Episode Psychosis: Influence on Social Cognition.

Aubrey M Moe, Heather M Wastler, Jacob G Pine, Nicholas J K Breitborde
Author Information
  1. Aubrey M Moe: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  2. Heather M Wastler: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  3. Jacob G Pine: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  4. Nicholas J K Breitborde: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Abstract

Background: Metacognitive skills training (MST) is often integrated into cognitive remediation programs for psychosis. Social cognition - the mental processes underlying social perception and behavior - is robustly related to outcomes in psychosis and is increasingly addressed with targeted treatments. Though metacognition and social cognition are related constructs, little is known about how MST may influence social cognition among individuals with psychosis participating in broad-based, non-social cognitive remediation.
Methods: Individuals with first-episode psychosis who completed six months of metacognitive remediation (MCR; n=12) were compared to a historical control group who received six months of computerized cognition remediation (CCR; n=10) alone (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01570972).
Results: Though individuals receiving MCR experienced gains in emotion processing and theory of mind, these changes were not significantly different when compared to individuals receiving CCR. MST did not contribute to social cognitive change in the context of CCR.
Discussion: Though MST may be relevant to facilitating social cognitive gains within broader cognitive remediation programs for first-episode psychosis, these benefits are limited and may not exceed those conferred by standard cognitive remediation. Opportunities for investigation of other potential mechanisms of social cognitive response to interventions remain.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT01570972

References

  1. J Abnorm Psychol. 1993 May;102(2):312-8 [PMID: 8315144]
  2. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2021 Sep;26(5):343-356 [PMID: 34180363]
  3. Schizophr Res. 2015 Feb;161(2-3):386-91 [PMID: 25499045]
  4. Schizophr Res. 2020 Jan;215:49-53 [PMID: 31699627]
  5. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;7(4):421-6 [PMID: 23445268]
  6. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Oct;105:212-219 [PMID: 31415864]
  7. Schizophr Res. 2018 Nov;201:180-186 [PMID: 29910120]
  8. Am J Psychiatry. 1993 Apr;150(4):589-94 [PMID: 8465875]
  9. Schizophr Res. 2017 Dec;190:136-143 [PMID: 28302395]
  10. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;11(3):244-249 [PMID: 26472632]
  11. Schizophr Bull. 2014 May;40(3):487-91 [PMID: 24636965]
  12. Front Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 21;7:105 [PMID: 27445866]
  13. Schizophr Res. 1995 Sep;17(1):5-13 [PMID: 8541250]
  14. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;12(3):464-468 [PMID: 28124452]
  15. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Dec;32(8):724-40 [PMID: 23059624]
  16. Neuropsychology. 2009 May;23(3):315-36 [PMID: 19413446]
  17. BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Oct 28;15:266 [PMID: 26511605]
  18. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):573-88 [PMID: 20620163]
  19. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;26(2):151-7 [PMID: 23318663]
  20. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 May;168(5):472-85 [PMID: 21406461]
  21. Schizophr Res Cogn. 2014 Mar 1;1(1):e11-e19 [PMID: 25267937]
  22. Schizophr Res. 2019 Jan;203:3-11 [PMID: 28712968]
  23. Schizophr Bull. 2009 Jan;35(1):109-14 [PMID: 19023126]

Grants

  1. KL2 TR002734/NCATS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cognitiveremediationsocialpsychosiscognitionMSTThoughmayindividualsfirst-episodeCCRMetacognitiveprogramsSocial-relatedmetacognitionamongIndividualssixmonthsMCRcomparedreceivinggainsBackground:skillstrainingoftenintegratedmentalprocessesunderlyingperceptionbehaviorrobustlyoutcomesincreasinglyaddressedtargetedtreatmentsconstructslittleknowninfluenceparticipatingbroad-basednon-socialMethods:completedmetacognitiven=12historicalcontrolgroupreceivedcomputerizedn=10aloneClinicalTrialsgovIdentifierNCT01570972Results:experiencedemotionprocessingtheorymindchangessignificantlydifferentcontributechangecontextDiscussion:relevantfacilitatingwithinbroaderbenefitslimitedexceedconferredstandardOpportunitiesinvestigationpotentialmechanismsresponseinterventionsremainSkillsTrainingComputerizedCognitiveRemediationFirst-EpisodePsychosis:InfluenceCognitionearlyintervention

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.