Physical activity on executive function in sedentary individuals: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Shudong Tian, Zhide Liang, Fanghui Qiu, Xianliang Wang
Author Information
  1. Shudong Tian: School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, China. ORCID
  2. Zhide Liang: Department of Physical Education, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266071, China.
  3. Fanghui Qiu: Department of Physical Education, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266071, China.
  4. Xianliang Wang: School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, China. ORCID

Abstract

Physical activity has been demonstrated to promote cognitive performance. However, the relationship between physical activity and executive function (EF) in sedentary individuals is not fully understood. This meta-analysis examined the impact of physical activity on EF in sedentary individuals and evaluated potential moderators of the relationship between physical activity and EF. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched. Included studies had to report sedentary individuals randomized to either a physical activity group or a control group. Subgroup analyses of EF sub-domains, exercise prescription and age were conducted alongside the overall meta-analysis. Thirteen RCT studies were included, with a total of 752 participants. Results showed a small to moderate beneficial effect of physical activity on EF (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.40). In subgroup analysis by EF sub-domains, physical activity enhanced inhibitory control (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.63) and working memory (SMD = 0.22, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.49), but not cognitive flexibility (SMD = 0.11, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.41). Interventions with an intervention length > 12 weeks improved overall EF (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.46), but intervention length ≤ 12 weeks did not (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.47). Interventions with session time ≥ 45 minutes improved overall EF (SMD = 0.47, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.77), but session time < 45 minutes did not (0.17, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.44). Physical activity improves EF for older adults (age ≥ 60 years) (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.42), but not for younger individuals (age < 60 years) (SMD = 0.17, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.59). Overall, physical activity has a beneficial effect on EF in sedentary individuals, although the influence may be domain specific and influenced by exercise prescription and age. These findings have practical implications for those seeking to improve EF in sedentary individuals through physical activity.

References

  1. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019 Sep 03;11:227 [PMID: 31551753]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 07;18(5): [PMID: 33800004]
  3. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:40 [PMID: 20459784]
  4. J Sports Sci. 2008 Feb 1;26(3):333-44 [PMID: 18074301]
  5. Front Aging Neurosci. 2010 Aug 26;2: [PMID: 20890449]
  6. Brain Res. 2012 May 9;1453:87-101 [PMID: 22480735]
  7. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 28;6(6):e011065 [PMID: 27354073]
  8. J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Aug;19(8):616-28 [PMID: 26552574]
  9. Brain Cogn. 2019 Apr;131:34-44 [PMID: 28844505]
  10. Age (Dordr). 2015 Aug;37(4):9815 [PMID: 26169946]
  11. Physiol Rep. 2018 Aug;6(16):e13805 [PMID: 30136401]
  12. Ergonomics. 2019 Jun;62(6):794-810 [PMID: 30762479]
  13. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 11;8:985 [PMID: 25566019]
  14. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;56(9):729-738 [PMID: 28838577]
  15. Sports Med. 2020 Aug;50(8):1451-1467 [PMID: 32447717]
  16. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58 [PMID: 12111919]
  17. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Dec 02;10(12):6645-61 [PMID: 24317382]
  18. J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Nov;18(6):697-703 [PMID: 25311901]
  19. Psychophysiology. 2016 Nov;53(11):1611-1626 [PMID: 27556572]
  20. BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700 [PMID: 19622552]
  21. J Am Coll Nutr. 2007 Oct;26(5 Suppl):555S-561S [PMID: 17921465]
  22. Front Physiol. 2019 Mar 26;10:312 [PMID: 30971946]
  23. Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jul 16;23:101496 [PMID: 34377632]
  24. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68 [PMID: 23020641]
  25. Front Aging Neurosci. 2013 Nov 12;5:75 [PMID: 24282403]
  26. Behav Brain Res. 2015 May 1;284:51-7 [PMID: 25655514]
  27. World Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;16(3):308-315 [PMID: 28941119]
  28. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2008 Oct;36(4):173-8 [PMID: 18815485]
  29. Biol Psychol. 2016 Dec;121(Pt A):109-116 [PMID: 27794449]
  30. Neurobiol Aging. 2014 Sep;35 Suppl 2:S20-8 [PMID: 24952993]
  31. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Sep;128:258-269 [PMID: 34147558]
  32. Biol Psychol. 2016 Mar;115:69-77 [PMID: 26812613]
  33. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 26;17(1):151 [PMID: 33239026]
  34. Psychol Sci. 2003 Mar;14(2):125-30 [PMID: 12661673]
  35. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142 [PMID: 31643080]
  36. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34 [PMID: 9310563]
  37. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;61(12):1241-1249.e2 [PMID: 18599268]
  38. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;53(22):1397-1404 [PMID: 30737201]
  39. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2016 Feb 1;25(1):3-7 [PMID: 26985139]
  40. Neurosci Lett. 2004 Jul 1;364(2):76-80 [PMID: 15196681]
  41. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Nov;34(11):2972-85 [PMID: 22674729]
  42. Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 02;10:832845 [PMID: 35186852]
  43. Neuroimage. 2016 May 1;131:133-41 [PMID: 26702778]
  44. Public Health Rep. 1985 Mar-Apr;100(2):126-31 [PMID: 3920711]
  45. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 May 18;14:892343 [PMID: 35663579]
  46. J Sci Med Sport. 2018 May;21(5):501-507 [PMID: 29054748]
  47. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Jul;109(4):617-24 [PMID: 20186426]
  48. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jun;51(6):1227-1241 [PMID: 31095080]
  49. Br J Sports Med. 2019 May;53(10):640-647 [PMID: 30061304]
  50. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):3017-22 [PMID: 21282661]
  51. Am J Health Promot. 2018 Mar;32(3):595-605 [PMID: 29214826]
  52. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;48(12):973-9 [PMID: 23467962]
  53. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jan;47(1):72-89 [PMID: 34408280]
  54. Circ Res. 2019 Mar;124(5):799-815 [PMID: 30817262]
  55. Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9 [PMID: 25046131]
  56. J Phys Act Health. 2017 Jun;14(6):429-439 [PMID: 28169561]
  57. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):603-612 [PMID: 32231280]
  58. Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jun;7(6):928-941 [PMID: 36973359]

MeSH Term

Humans
Aged
Middle Aged
Executive Function
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Exercise
Exercise Therapy
Memory, Short-Term

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00activityEF95%CISMD=physicalsedentaryindividuals-0agePhysicalmeta-analysisoverall0812cognitiverelationshipexecutivefunctionstudiesrandomizedgroupcontrolsub-domainsexerciseprescriptionbeneficialeffect2211Interventionsinterventionlengthweeksimproved47sessiontime45minutes<1760years25demonstratedpromoteperformanceHoweverfullyunderstoodexaminedimpactevaluatedpotentialmoderatorsaccordancePRISMAguidelineselectronicdatabasesMEDLINEEmbasePsycINFOWebSciencesearchedIncludedreporteitherSubgroupanalysesconductedalongsideThirteenRCTincludedtotal752participantsResultsshowedsmallmoderate2440subgroupanalysisenhancedinhibitory3863workingmemory0549flexibility1841>260646207744improvesolderadults42younger59Overallalthoughinfluencemaydomainspecificinfluencedfindingspracticalimplicationsseekingimproveindividuals:Systematicreviewcontrolledtrials

Similar Articles

Cited By