Small workers are more persistent when providing and requiring help in a monomorphic ant.

Filip Turza, Krzysztof Miler
Author Information
  1. Filip Turza: Doctoral School of Exact and Natural Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Prof. S. Łojasiewicza 11, 30-348, Kraków, Poland. filip.turza@uj.edu.pl.
  2. Krzysztof Miler: Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sławkowska 17, 31-016, Kraków, Poland. miler@isez.pan.krakow.pl.

Abstract

The common sand-dwelling Formica cinerea ants possess monomorphic workers, yet with considerable and easily identified size variation. Considering the importance of body size in polymorphic ants and other animals, we test whether size-dependent differences in behaviour occur in this species. We focus on the behaviour of large and small foragers in the context of rescue occurring between nestmates when one of them is entrapped and requires help. We show that workers of different sizes are characterized by a similar frequency of rescue activity and time delay to the first act of rescue. However, small workers rescue for longer than large workers. These results indicate that, although there is no size-related rescue specialization in F. cinerea foragers, small rescuers behave differently than large ones in terms of rescue persistence. Additionally, we show that small workers are more active when trapped. We suggest that variation in behavioural persistence of differently-sized workers may increase the efficiency of rescue actions. This study is the first to find a connection between body size and rescue behaviour in ants and the first to quantify and analyze the behaviour of individuals in need of rescue. These findings add substantially to our understanding of social insects and, more generally, highlight the need to study among-individual behavioural variation in social animals, including those in which body size is judged minute and irrelevant.

References

  1. Science. 1965 Sep 17;149(3690):1392-3 [PMID: 17741924]
  2. Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:413-40 [PMID: 11112175]
  3. Commun Integr Biol. 2010 Mar;3(2):77-9 [PMID: 20585494]
  4. PLoS One. 2009 Aug 12;4(8):e6573 [PMID: 19672292]
  5. J Exp Biol. 2020 Feb 28;223(Pt 5): [PMID: 32029458]
  6. Science. 2011 Dec 9;334(6061):1427-30 [PMID: 22158823]
  7. J Insect Behav. 2017;30(6):632-644 [PMID: 29386747]
  8. Learn Behav. 2022 Sep;50(3):329-338 [PMID: 35129828]
  9. Anim Cogn. 2023 Sep;26(5):1643-1647 [PMID: 37450227]
  10. Behav Processes. 2017 Nov;144:1-4 [PMID: 28843392]
  11. PLoS One. 2019 Apr 3;14(4):e0213930 [PMID: 30943247]
  12. Curr Zool. 2021 Jul 01;68(2):159-168 [PMID: 35355949]
  13. Am J Primatol. 2006 Oct;68(10):1012-6 [PMID: 16892414]
  14. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 10;11(1):16217 [PMID: 34376774]
  15. Anim Behav. 1997 Oct;54(4):999-1012 [PMID: 9344452]
  16. Insectes Soc. 2017;64(2):303-305 [PMID: 28479609]
  17. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2001 Dec;131(1):7-20 [PMID: 11733162]
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 24;109(4):1182-6 [PMID: 22232688]
  19. Biology (Basel). 2021 Oct 22;10(11): [PMID: 34827072]
  20. Annu Rev Entomol. 2018 Jan 7;63:575-598 [PMID: 29068707]
  21. J Insect Physiol. 2005 Aug;51(8):853-60 [PMID: 15935374]
  22. J Insect Sci. 2013;13:115 [PMID: 24735372]
  23. Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug;36(8):671-673 [PMID: 34226080]
  24. Curr Zool. 2022 Jun 25;69(3):360-366 [PMID: 37351298]
  25. Sci Adv. 2017 Apr 12;3(4):e1602187 [PMID: 28439543]
  26. Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 9;9(1):5817 [PMID: 30967573]
  27. Am Nat. 2019 Sep;194(3):395-404 [PMID: 31553216]
  28. Learn Behav. 2022 Mar;50(1):71-81 [PMID: 34918204]
  29. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48516 [PMID: 23144897]
  30. Monogr Popul Biol. 1978;12:1-352 [PMID: 740003]
  31. Syst Biol. 2020 Nov 1;69(6):1039-1051 [PMID: 32208482]
  32. Primates. 2015 Apr;56(2):127-9 [PMID: 25737055]
  33. Behav Processes. 2017 Jun;139:12-18 [PMID: 28215553]
  34. Curr Biol. 2020 Oct 19;30(20):4047-4055.e3 [PMID: 32822603]
  35. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151925 [PMID: 26986741]
  36. J Exp Biol. 2017 Jan 1;220(Pt 1):53-62 [PMID: 28057828]
  37. Oecologia. 2002 Jul;132(2):244-249 [PMID: 28547358]
  38. Insects. 2020 Jul 10;11(7): [PMID: 32664435]
  39. Ecol Evol. 2020 Dec 08;11(1):547-559 [PMID: 33437450]

Grants

  1. PRELUDIUM 16, number 2018/31/N/NZ8/02312/Narodowe Centrum Nauki

MeSH Term

Animals
Ants
Behavior, Animal
Social Behavior
Body Size
Efficiency

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0rescueworkerssizebehavioursmallantsvariationbodylargefirstcinereamonomorphicanimalsforagershelpshowpersistencebehaviouralstudyneedsocialcommonsand-dwellingFormicapossessyetconsiderableeasilyidentifiedConsideringimportancepolymorphictestwhethersize-dependentdifferencesoccurspeciesfocuscontextoccurringnestmatesoneentrappedrequiresdifferentsizescharacterizedsimilarfrequencyactivitytimedelayactHoweverlongerresultsindicatealthoughsize-relatedspecializationFrescuersbehavedifferentlyonestermsAdditionallyactivetrappedsuggestdifferently-sizedmayincreaseefficiencyactionsfindconnectionquantifyanalyzeindividualsfindingsaddsubstantiallyunderstandinginsectsgenerallyhighlightamong-individualincludingjudgedminuteirrelevantSmallpersistentprovidingrequiringant

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)