Gaps in sexual health content of healthcare professional curriculum: a systematic review of educational interventions.

Nikole Bekman Troxman Prize, Sarit Shimony- Kanat, Anna C Kienski Woloski Wruble
Author Information
  1. Nikole Bekman Troxman Prize: School of Nursing in the Faculty of Medicine, Henrietta Szold Hadassah Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel. nikib670@gmail.com.
  2. Sarit Shimony- Kanat: School of Nursing in the Faculty of Medicine, Henrietta Szold Hadassah Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
  3. Anna C Kienski Woloski Wruble: School of Nursing in the Faculty of Medicine, Henrietta Szold Hadassah Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sexual Health care, including assessment and patient teaching, is part of comprehensive patient care. Health professional (medical and nursing) students' education in sexual Health lacks uniformity in content and assessment skills.
OBJECTIVES: The current systematic review aimed to assess sexual Health educational curriculum for Health professional students regarding the educational content, duration, and evaluation of these educational interventions.
METHODS: This systematic review followed the preferred reporting guidelines for systematic reviews. A comprehensive search was conducted between May-August, 2023 across four databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE), outlining 614 sources. Following the screening process, 36 educational intervention studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. The quality assessment of these studies was conducted using The Effective Public Health Project tool, which was found appropriate for evaluating this type of research.
RESULTS: The studies had a global representation, with most studies conducted in the US. Limited nursing educational interventions were found. Three main categories emerged from the analysis of the educational interventions: one-time interventions, workshops, and semester courses. These categories differed in terms of their duration. Upon evaluating the educational intervention programs, it was found that the majority relied on participant self-reporting, while only a few included objective evaluations.
CONCLUSIONS: This review revealed inconsistencies in educational content for healthcare professional students and may impact their clinical skills, particularly in sexual Health. The variation in content, duration, and evaluation methods created challenges in assessing the interventions. The lack of standardized sexual Health education highlighted a significant gap, raising concerns about students' ultimate proficiency in this area. Bridging this divide is essential by integrating comprehensive sexual Health content and assessment skills into the Health professional curriculum.

Keywords

References

  1. MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Dec 07;14:10781 [PMID: 30800981]
  2. J Surg Res. 2021 Apr;260:169-176 [PMID: 33341680]
  3. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Oct;28(19-20):3556-3566 [PMID: 31165516]
  4. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Oct;13(10):1351-1357 [PMID: 34521531]
  5. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021 Apr;57(2):667-674 [PMID: 32730656]
  6. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jul;70:103668 [PMID: 37247565]
  7. Med Teach. 2011;33(6):e324-32 [PMID: 21609169]
  8. MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Nov 09;14:10772 [PMID: 30800972]
  9. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;18(1):12-8 [PMID: 20698919]
  10. Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Nov;103(11):2205-2213 [PMID: 32601041]
  11. Fam Med. 2021 May;53(5):362-365 [PMID: 34019683]
  12. J Sex Med. 2006 Jan;3(1):37-46 [PMID: 16409216]
  13. Sex Med. 2015 Sep;3(3):189-97 [PMID: 26468382]
  14. J Clin Nurs. 2013 Dec;22(23-24):3568-76 [PMID: 23742114]
  15. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2014 Sep;45(9):393-401 [PMID: 25153429]
  16. MedEdPORTAL. 2022 Oct 25;18:11275 [PMID: 36310568]
  17. Clin Teach. 2018 Jun;15(3):208-213 [PMID: 29696789]
  18. Midwifery. 2018 Jun;61:8-14 [PMID: 29505946]
  19. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jun;113:105371 [PMID: 35524991]
  20. Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;40:152-156 [PMID: 29579491]
  21. J Nurs Educ. 2020 Jun 1;59(6):336-340 [PMID: 32497236]
  22. J Sex Med. 2010 Oct;7(10):3315-21 [PMID: 20561162]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 28;16(13): [PMID: 31261831]
  24. J Sex Med. 2016 Jul;13(7):1013-26 [PMID: 27318019]
  25. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 25;17(7): [PMID: 32218258]
  26. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):3906-3916 [PMID: 28328169]
  27. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2021 Oct;9(4):189-196 [PMID: 34692856]
  28. Int J Sex Health. 2021 Dec 2;34(2):267-276 [PMID: 38596524]
  29. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:147-150 [PMID: 29121553]
  30. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):1279-1288 [PMID: 31037543]
  31. Acad Med. 2011 Dec;86(12):1590-5 [PMID: 22030763]
  32. Acad Pediatr. 2021 Nov-Dec;21(8):1449-1457 [PMID: 34098174]
  33. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 22;16(1):299 [PMID: 27876033]
  34. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210 [PMID: 27919275]
  35. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013 Aug;20(6):582-7 [PMID: 23910837]
  36. J Sex Med. 2006 Jan;3(1):47-55 [PMID: 16409217]
  37. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Sep;92:104506 [PMID: 32599471]
  38. MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Dec 27;12:10522 [PMID: 30984864]
  39. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1(3):176-84 [PMID: 17163895]
  40. Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jul;101(7):1298-1301 [PMID: 29514750]
  41. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:103-112 [PMID: 33577987]
  42. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Sep;28(17-18):3065-3076 [PMID: 31017326]
  43. Sex Med. 2021 Apr;9(2):100323 [PMID: 33676228]
  44. Med Teach. 2005 Aug;27(5):422-8 [PMID: 16147795]
  45. J Sex Med. 2018 Oct;15(10):1414-1425 [PMID: 30297093]
  46. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):248-52 [PMID: 20053518]
  47. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 May;33(5):498-503 [PMID: 22789872]
  48. J Sex Med. 2009 Feb;6(2):362-8 [PMID: 19215615]
  49. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 8;21(1):37 [PMID: 33419437]
  50. Comput Inform Nurs. 2016 Jan;34(1):17-25; quiz 55 [PMID: 26535768]
  51. J Sex Med. 2013 Jan;10(1):26-35 [PMID: 22970717]

MeSH Term

Humans
Curriculum
Delivery of Health Care
Health Personnel
Sexual Health

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healtheducationalcontentprofessionalsexualassessmentinterventionsSexualsystematicreviewstudiescomprehensiveHealthskillsstudentsdurationconductedinterventionfoundcarepatientnursingstudents'educationcurriculumevaluationevaluatingcategorieshealthcareBACKGROUND:includingteachingpartmedicallacksuniformityOBJECTIVES:currentaimedassessregardingMETHODS:followedpreferredreportingguidelinesreviewssearchMay-August2023acrossfourdatabasesPubMedScopusCINAHLEMBASEoutlining614sourcesFollowingscreeningprocess36deemedeligibleinclusionqualityusingEffectivePublicProjecttoolappropriatetyperesearchRESULTS:globalrepresentationUSLimitedThreemainemergedanalysisinterventions:one-timeworkshopssemestercoursesdifferedtermsUponprogramsmajorityreliedparticipantself-reportingincludedobjectiveevaluationsCONCLUSIONS:revealedinconsistenciesmayimpactclinicalparticularlyvariationmethodscreatedchallengesassessinglackstandardizedhighlightedsignificantgapraisingconcernsultimateproficiencyareaBridgingdivideessentialintegratingGapscurriculum:

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)