Construction of a physical fitness evaluation index system and model for high-level freestyle skiing aerials athletes in China.

Youwei Yao, Xuesong Niu
Author Information
  1. Youwei Yao: School of Sports Training, Shenyang Sport University, Shenyang, China. ORCID
  2. Xuesong Niu: School of Social Sports, Shenyang Sport University, Shenyang, China. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to enhance the competitive level of Chinese freestyle skiing aerials athletes by developing a specialized physical fitness evaluation index system and model tailored for high-level Chinese athletes. This system intends to provide theoretical references and training monitoring schemes in preparation for the 25th Milan Winter Olympics.
METHODS: A study was conducted on 29 high-level Chinese freestyle skiing aerials athletes. Physical fitness test indexes were selected using a literature review, expert interviews, and questionnaire surveys, and athletes were tested. Athletes were ensured to be in optimal physical condition before testing. Based on the test results, the representative indexes of the evaluation system are finally determined by combining R-type clustering analysis, multiple linear regression analysis. Determine index weights through weight questionnaires and normalization, and develop evaluation standards through methods such as percentile counting and weighted scoring.
RESULTS: Physical fitness evaluation system for Chinese freestyle skiing aerialists includes three aspects: evaluation index, index weight, and evaluation standard. The evaluation indexes include 3 first-level, 11 second-level, and 11 third-level indexes of body form, physiological function, and physical quality. In the evaluation weight, physical quality is ranked first, and physiological function and body form rank second and third, respectively. The evaluation standard consists of a scoring evaluation standard and a rating evaluation standard. Based on the index system, this study constructs the general and ideal physical fitness model of China's high-level freestyle aerials athletes.
CONCLUSION: The constructed physical fitness evaluation system effectively represents physical fitness development status of high-level freestyle skiing aerials athletes, providing a basis for creating personalized training plans. The established model serves as a reference for athletes' physical fitness development objectives.

References

  1. J Sci Med Sport. 2013 Jul;16(4):307-11 [PMID: 23092650]
  2. Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 11;13(1):11239 [PMID: 37433875]
  3. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 May;34(5):1249-1253 [PMID: 32084107]
  4. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Apr;90(4):1349-58 [PMID: 11247934]
  5. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Dec;88:313-321 [PMID: 30196187]
  6. Sports Med. 2016 Oct;46(10):1419-49 [PMID: 26838985]
  7. Sports Med. 2006;36(3):189-98 [PMID: 16526831]
  8. Percept Mot Skills. 2013 Dec;117(3):837-54 [PMID: 24665801]
  9. J Biomech. 2013 Mar 15;46(5):1008-13 [PMID: 23235111]
  10. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;48(1):29-35 [PMID: 23703581]
  11. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;49(12):825-7 [PMID: 25907180]
  12. Int J Sports Med. 1989 Jun;10(3):165-8 [PMID: 2777435]
  13. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Dec;25(12):3358-67 [PMID: 22080317]
  14. Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 15;13(1):4308 [PMID: 36922628]
  15. J Sports Sci. 2021 Feb;39(4):368-379 [PMID: 32972318]
  16. BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 5;8(3):e018697 [PMID: 29506981]
  17. Front Physiol. 2021 Jan 08;11:589983 [PMID: 33488394]
  18. J Athl Train. 2020 Jul 1;55(7):717-723 [PMID: 32432902]
  19. J Biomech Eng. 2009 Dec;131(12):121007 [PMID: 20524730]
  20. Science. 1997 Feb 21;275(5303):1113-5 [PMID: 9027309]
  21. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(7):671-8 [PMID: 26177151]
  22. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48345 [PMID: 23185253]
  23. Front Physiol. 2022 Nov 03;13:994818 [PMID: 36406981]
  24. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Jan;68(1):62-7 [PMID: 22511289]
  25. J Physiol. 2007 May 15;581(Pt 1):389-403 [PMID: 17317739]
  26. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Jan;32(1):70-84 [PMID: 10647532]
  27. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 24;18(4):e0283228 [PMID: 37093847]
  28. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Sep;53(17):1085-1092 [PMID: 31235615]
  29. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 3;20(1):512 [PMID: 31679520]
  30. Br J Sports Med. 1978 Sep;12(3):129-33 [PMID: 719321]
  31. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):67-72 [PMID: 30648682]
  32. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;53(12):731-736 [PMID: 31097460]
  33. J Sports Sci. 1993 Jun;11(3):209-18 [PMID: 8336352]
  34. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 11;10(3):e0118903 [PMID: 25760381]
  35. Phys Ther Sport. 2020 May;43:230-235 [PMID: 31902735]
  36. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 26;13:968651 [PMID: 36225691]
  37. J Orthop Res. 2003 Nov;21(6):1098-106 [PMID: 14554224]
  38. Sports Med. 1995 Apr;19(4):288-302 [PMID: 7604201]
  39. Front Physiol. 2013 Nov 12;4:332 [PMID: 24273518]
  40. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Jun;34(6):1657-1665 [PMID: 28859012]
  41. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2002 Jul;30(3):106-10 [PMID: 12150568]
  42. Sports Med. 1986 Jan-Feb;3(1):61-8 [PMID: 3633121]
  43. J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Jun 1;36(6):1560-1567 [PMID: 35622107]
  44. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Apr;49(7):441-7 [PMID: 25631542]
  45. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Oct;35(10):1745-50 [PMID: 14523314]
  46. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Apr;121(4):1189-1196 [PMID: 33521869]
  47. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 5;14(2):e0211533 [PMID: 30721273]
  48. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33(7):1904-1911 [PMID: 28723818]
  49. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Jan;65:439-453 [PMID: 27662625]
  50. Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 29;13:902516 [PMID: 35846645]
  51. J Biomech. 2013 Sep 3;46(13):2264-70 [PMID: 23871234]
  52. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jan;25(1):252-61 [PMID: 20179652]
  53. J Physiol. 2006 Sep 15;575(Pt 3):937-52 [PMID: 16793898]
  54. Sports Med. 2015 Jun;45(6):823-39 [PMID: 25689955]
  55. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Apr;34(4):934-941 [PMID: 31972819]

MeSH Term

Humans
Athletes
China
Exercise
Physical Fitness
Skiing

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0evaluationphysicalfitnessathletessystemfreestyleindexskiingaerialshigh-levelChinesemodelindexesstandardstudyweighttrainingPhysicaltestBasedanalysisscoring11bodyformphysiologicalfunctionqualitydevelopmentOBJECTIVE:aimsenhancecompetitiveleveldevelopingspecializedtailoredintendsprovidetheoreticalreferencesmonitoringschemespreparation25thMilanWinterOlympicsMETHODS:conducted29selectedusingliteraturereviewexpertinterviewsquestionnairesurveystestedAthletesensuredoptimalconditiontestingresultsrepresentativefinallydeterminedcombiningR-typeclusteringmultiplelinearregressionDetermineweightsquestionnairesnormalizationdevelopstandardsmethodspercentilecountingweightedRESULTS:aerialistsincludesthreeaspects:include3first-levelsecond-levelthird-levelrankedfirstranksecondthirdrespectivelyconsistsratingconstructsgeneralidealChina'sCONCLUSION:constructedeffectivelyrepresentsstatusprovidingbasiscreatingpersonalizedplansestablishedservesreferenceathletes'objectivesConstructionChina

Similar Articles

Cited By