The Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: Critical Gaps in the Discovery of Biomarkers.

Roberto Gasparri, Angela Sabalic, Lorenzo Spaggiari
Author Information
  1. Roberto Gasparri: Division of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy. ORCID
  2. Angela Sabalic: Division of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy. ORCID
  3. Lorenzo Spaggiari: Division of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.

Abstract

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The main issue is the absence of a screening test available in clinical practice; the identification of noninvasive biomarkers is thus an urgent clinical necessity. Currently, low-dose computed tomography (LD-CT) demonstrates a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality. However, it is not particularly suitable for clinical practice because of its costs, radiation, and false-positive rate. Several studies have therefore focused on research into biomarkers in body fluids. Despite the power of certain molecules to distinguish lung cancer patients from healthy subjects, no biomarker has yet been shown to significantly and reliably influence clinical decisions or to be translated from the laboratory to clinical practice. In this paper, we provide an overview of the peer-reviewed biomedical literature published in the last 10 years on the research regarding biomarkers for the early diagnosis of lung cancer via a comprehensive analysis of the reviews published this past year. Our main objective is to highlight the limitations and strengths of studies on predictive lung cancer biomarkers to stimulate further investigation for early diagnosis. Finally, we discuss future perspectives on managing clinical trials for biomarker research and their integration into clinical practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2012;76(4):679-84 [PMID: 22484930]
  2. Biomark Insights. 2018 Jan 15;13:1177271917751608 [PMID: 29371783]
  3. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2022 May;1877(3):188729 [PMID: 35436521]
  4. Lung Cancer. 2019 Sep;135:123-129 [PMID: 31446984]
  5. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023 Mar;20(3):143-159 [PMID: 36639452]
  6. Lung Cancer. 2013 Sep;81(3):397-403 [PMID: 23806794]
  7. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Oct;12(10):1544-1551 [PMID: 28709937]
  8. Chest. 2013 Sep;144(3):746-749 [PMID: 24008952]
  9. Med Oncol. 2012 Dec;29(5):3190-7 [PMID: 22782668]
  10. Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7802):245-251 [PMID: 32269342]
  11. Clin Respir J. 2018 Jun;12(6):2020-2028 [PMID: 29356386]
  12. Transl Oncol. 2013 Dec 01;6(6):697-702 [PMID: 24466372]
  13. J Breath Res. 2022 Sep 02;16(4): [PMID: 35952625]
  14. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Mar;69(3):89-95 [PMID: 11240971]
  15. Tumour Biol. 2012 Oct;33(5):1319-26 [PMID: 22492236]
  16. Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Feb 11;13(4):6214-6227 [PMID: 33591942]
  17. J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Oct;7(10):1528-33 [PMID: 22929969]
  18. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Jul;20(7):754-764 [PMID: 35830884]
  19. Lung Cancer. 2021 Apr;154:197-205 [PMID: 33653598]
  20. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 28;24(3): [PMID: 36768828]
  21. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2008 Oct;2(10-11):1508-17 [PMID: 21136798]
  22. Science. 2018 Feb 23;359(6378):926-930 [PMID: 29348365]
  23. Cancer Cell. 2006 Mar;9(3):189-98 [PMID: 16530703]
  24. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;20(9):624-639 [PMID: 37479810]
  25. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249 [PMID: 33538338]
  26. Chest. 2023 Oct;164(4):1028-1041 [PMID: 37244587]
  27. Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Aug;128(8):553-562 [PMID: 32320527]
  28. J Transl Med. 2015 Feb 12;13:55 [PMID: 25880432]
  29. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 Aug;62(8):2044-54 [PMID: 25775482]
  30. RNA Biol. 2012 Jun;9(6):900-10 [PMID: 22664918]
  31. Nat Med. 1995 Jul;1(7):701-2 [PMID: 7585154]
  32. Clin Transl Med. 2020 Jul;10(3):e128 [PMID: 32659050]
  33. Ann Oncol. 2022 Apr;33(4):395-405 [PMID: 35091076]
  34. Curr Chall Thorac Surg. 2023 Feb 25;5: [PMID: 37016707]
  35. Nat Med. 2014 May;20(5):548-54 [PMID: 24705333]
  36. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 10;32(8):768-73 [PMID: 24419137]
  37. Chest. 2018 Sep;154(3):491-500 [PMID: 29496499]
  38. Lung Cancer. 2023 Jan;175:131-140 [PMID: 36529115]
  39. J Thorac Oncol. 2011 May;6(5):955-62 [PMID: 21415775]
  40. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr 15;191(8):924-31 [PMID: 25668622]
  41. J Breath Res. 2021 Mar 01;15(2): [PMID: 33578407]
  42. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8): [PMID: 35457500]
  43. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 26;99(24):15524-9 [PMID: 12434020]
  44. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2508:115-134 [PMID: 35737237]
  45. Chest. 2023 Mar;163(3):697-706 [PMID: 36243060]
  46. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Jul 18;93(14):1054-61 [PMID: 11459866]
  47. Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 21;11:801269 [PMID: 35127511]
  48. Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;127(12):2870-8 [PMID: 21351266]
  49. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;14(23): [PMID: 36497263]
  50. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 31;9(10):e111597 [PMID: 25360587]
  51. J Breath Res. 2016 Feb 09;10(1):016007 [PMID: 26857451]
  52. J Surg Res. 2023 Dec;292:307-316 [PMID: 37683455]
  53. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 19;107(6):djv063 [PMID: 25794889]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0clinicalcancerbiomarkerslungpracticeresearchearlydiagnosisLungmortalitymainstudiesbodyfluidsbiomarkerpublishedremainsleadingcausecancer-relatedworldwideissueabsencescreeningtestavailableidentificationnoninvasivethusurgentnecessityCurrentlylow-dosecomputedtomographyLD-CTdemonstrates20%reductionHoweverparticularlysuitablecostsradiationfalse-positiverateSeveralthereforefocusedDespitepowercertainmoleculesdistinguishpatientshealthysubjectsyetshownsignificantlyreliablyinfluencedecisionstranslatedlaboratorypaperprovideoverviewpeer-reviewedbiomedicalliteraturelast10yearsregardingviacomprehensiveanalysisreviewspastyearobjectivehighlightlimitationsstrengthspredictivestimulateinvestigationFinallydiscussfutureperspectivesmanagingtrialsintegrationEarlyDiagnosisCancer:CriticalGapsDiscoveryBiomarkersmanagement

Similar Articles

Cited By