Does positive feedback or appraisal about medical providers increase patients' trust and lead to better treatment outcomes? A double-blind randomized control trial.

Huan-Jui Yeh, Hui-Chen Cheng, Shang-Chien Huang, Shun-Ping Cheng
Author Information
  1. Huan-Jui Yeh: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare: No. 127, Su-Yuan Rd., Hsin-Chuang Dist., New Taipei City 24213, Taiwan.
  2. Hui-Chen Cheng: Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
  3. Shang-Chien Huang: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare: No. 127, Su-Yuan Rd., Hsin-Chuang Dist., New Taipei City 24213, Taiwan.
  4. Shun-Ping Cheng: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare: No. 127, Su-Yuan Rd., Hsin-Chuang Dist., New Taipei City 24213, Taiwan.

Abstract

[Purpose] Trust among patients and clinical suppliers is the foundation for achieving appropriate treatment. This double-blind randomized control trial aimed to determine whether providing patients a pre-treatment physical therapists' introductions and positive appraisal can enhance the trust of patients in therapists. [Participants and Methods] This study included patients diagnosed with lumbar spine spondylosis or non-acute lower back muscle strain who were divided into intervention and control groups. The previously recorded video informed the intervention group patients that they were assigned to our best therapist because of their participation. The primary outcome was evaluated twice, once before and once after the treatment, and the secondary outcome was measured using the second time pain inventory evaluation. [Results] A total of 32 patients participated in this study. No significant difference was found in patients' trust in therapists between the two groups, and a lower successful treatment rate with a higher pain influence level to daily life was noted in the intervention group. [Conclusion] Doctors who offer introductions with a positive assessment of physical therapists cannot change the trust of patients on therapists. Furthermore, this action may risk worse treatment outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. Man Ther. 2012 Feb;17(1):27-33 [PMID: 21903445]
  2. Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1770-1780 [PMID: 28576500]
  3. J Fam Pract. 2005 Apr;54(4):344-52 [PMID: 15833226]
  4. Hosp Top. 2015 Jan-Mar;93(1):13-8 [PMID: 25839351]
  5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct 03;5:64 [PMID: 16202125]
  6. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 7;15(1):8 [PMID: 28173859]
  7. Eur J Pain. 2013 Jul;17(6):903-15 [PMID: 23165778]
  8. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4:CD011279 [PMID: 28436583]
  9. Orv Hetil. 2007 Mar 25;148(12):531-4 [PMID: 17444017]
  10. Soc Work Res. 2013 Sep 1;37(3):219-226 [PMID: 24764690]
  11. Asia Pac Fam Med. 2014 Jan 08;13(1):2 [PMID: 24397871]
  12. J Fam Pract. 1997 Feb;44(2):169-76 [PMID: 9040520]
  13. Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:75-81 [PMID: 27497858]
  14. Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;60(9):684-688 [PMID: 27729698]
  15. Physiol Rev. 2013 Jul;93(3):1207-46 [PMID: 23899563]
  16. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Mar;31(3):191-8 [PMID: 18394495]
  17. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Oct;21(5):798-801 [PMID: 25903142]
  18. Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):470-8 [PMID: 23139428]
  19. Fam Pract. 2002 Oct;19(5):476-83 [PMID: 12356698]
  20. Eur J Clin Invest. 2016 Dec;46(12):985-993 [PMID: 27711975]
  21. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):295-301 [PMID: 19150199]
  22. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Dec;89(3):387-91 [PMID: 22445730]
  23. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):196-204 [PMID: 18450408]
  24. Arch Intern Med. 2004 May 10;164(9):1015-20 [PMID: 15136312]
  25. Psychother Psychosom. 2004 Mar-Apr;73(2):92-100 [PMID: 14767151]
  26. Med Care. 1998 May;36(5):728-39 [PMID: 9596063]
  27. Med Sci Monit. 2014 Jul 05;20:1142-50 [PMID: 24996983]
  28. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Sep;51(5):657-68 [PMID: 10975226]
  29. Pain. 1996 Oct;67(2-3):407-16 [PMID: 8951936]
  30. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(2):213-20 [PMID: 23640324]
  31. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Oct;47(4):417-23 [PMID: 25084682]
  32. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 30;15:297 [PMID: 26223973]
  33. BMC Med Educ. 2017 Feb 2;17(1):32 [PMID: 28148254]
  34. Med Care Res Rev. 2002 Sep;59(3):293-318 [PMID: 12205830]
  35. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Nov - Dec;39(9):645-654 [PMID: 27838140]
  36. Health Mark Q. 2009 Jul-Sep;26(3):183-97 [PMID: 19813122]
  37. J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(5):434-55 [PMID: 17087404]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientstreatmenttrusttherapistscontrolpositiveinterventionTrustdouble-blindrandomizedtrialphysicalintroductionsappraisalstudylowergroupsgroupoutcomepainpatients'[Purpose]amongclinicalsuppliersfoundationachievingappropriateaimeddeterminewhetherprovidingpre-treatmenttherapists'canenhance[ParticipantsMethods]includeddiagnosedlumbarspinespondylosisnon-acutebackmusclestraindividedpreviouslyrecordedvideoinformedassignedbesttherapistparticipationprimaryevaluatedtwicesecondarymeasuredusingsecondtimeinventoryevaluation[Results]total32participatedsignificantdifferencefoundtwosuccessfulratehigherinfluenceleveldailylifenoted[Conclusion]DoctorsofferassessmentchangeFurthermoreactionmayriskworseoutcomesfeedbackmedicalprovidersincreaseleadbetteroutcomes?PersuasivecommunicationPropaganda

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.