Establishing Foundational Nonarbitrary Distinctive and Categorical Relational Responding in Children with Autism.

Jordan Belisle, Lauren Lang, Mark R Dixon, Karen Harper, Brittany Sellers
Author Information
  1. Jordan Belisle: Missouri State University, 901 South National Avenue, Springfield, MO USA.
  2. Lauren Lang: ABA of Illinois, LLC, Darien, IL USA.
  3. Mark R Dixon: University of Illinois, Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.
  4. Karen Harper: ABA of Illinois, LLC, Darien, IL USA.
  5. Brittany Sellers: Missouri State University, 901 South National Avenue, Springfield, MO USA.

Abstract

The present study sought to evaluate a sequence of training procedures on the emergence of foundational relational responses that underly more complex distinctive (i.e., difference) and hierarchical (i.e., categorical) relational frames. In a multiple baseline design, an initial baseline period with three children with Autism showed that the participants did not select nonidentical stimuli from an array when presented the contextual cue "different." Simple discrimination training was efficacious in establishing this response and the skill transferred to a novel set of stimuli without reinforcement. In a second baseline period, participants did not demonstrate conditional identical/nonidentical relational responses when provided the contextual cues "same" and "different." Conditional discrimination training with all three participants was again efficacious in establishing the conditional reflexive and distinctive responses and the skill transferred to untrained stimuli. In a third baseline period, participants did not demonstrate correct conditional categorization/sorting. Like in the prior two training conditions, training was efficacious in establishing the target response with a generalized transfer to untrained stimuli.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):156-60 [PMID: 24249703]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):61-75 [PMID: 24310480]
  3. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Apr;51(2):352-359 [PMID: 29509272]
  4. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Fall;40(3):489-99 [PMID: 17970262]
  5. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Spring;44(1):109-19 [PMID: 21541138]
  6. J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Apr;53(2):938-955 [PMID: 31650537]
  7. J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Summer;42(2):253-68 [PMID: 19949513]
  8. J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Fall;45(3):619-24 [PMID: 23060677]
  9. J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Dec;49(4):965-969 [PMID: 27279459]
  10. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:101-38 [PMID: 11605362]
  11. Anal Verbal Behav. 2020 Mar 19;36(1):115-145 [PMID: 32699742]
  12. J Exp Child Psychol. 1991 Apr;51(2):280-95 [PMID: 2033364]
  13. Dev Neurorehabil. 2016;19(2):75-87 [PMID: 24784794]
  14. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1980 Jul;6(3):278-99 [PMID: 7391753]
  15. Behav Anal. 2017 Oct 10;40(2):493-521 [PMID: 31978209]
  16. J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Apr;50(2):429-455 [PMID: 28078688]
  17. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;26(3):191-200 [PMID: 8576398]
  18. Res Dev Disabil. 1987;8(1):137-51 [PMID: 3659440]
  19. J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Jan;51(1):53-60 [PMID: 29265371]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trainingbaselineparticipantsstimulirelationalresponsesperiodefficaciousestablishingconditionaldistinctiveiethreecontextual"different"discriminationresponseskilltransferreddemonstrateuntrainedRelationalpresentstudysoughtevaluatesequenceproceduresemergencefoundationalunderlycomplexdifferencehierarchicalcategoricalframesmultipledesigninitialchildrenautismshowedselectnonidenticalarraypresentedcueSimplenovelsetwithoutreinforcementsecondidentical/nonidenticalprovidedcues"same"Conditionalreflexivethirdcorrectcategorization/sortingLikepriortwoconditionstargetgeneralizedtransferEstablishingFoundationalNonarbitraryDistinctiveCategoricalRespondingChildrenAutismDistinctionHierarchicalrespondingPEAKframetheory

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.