Role of individual and combined impact of simvastatin and α-TCP in rat calvarial bone defect: An experimental study.

Surendar Sugumaran, Deepak Selvam, M S Nivedhitha, Karthik Ganesh Mohanraj, Bader O Almutairi, Selvaraj Arokiyaraj, Ajay Guru, Jesu Arockiaraj
Author Information
  1. Surendar Sugumaran: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
  2. Deepak Selvam: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
  3. M S Nivedhitha: Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
  4. Karthik Ganesh Mohanraj: Department of Anatomy, Biomedical Research Unit and Lab Animal Centre, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
  5. Bader O Almutairi: Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
  6. Selvaraj Arokiyaraj: Department of Food Science & Biotechnology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.
  7. Ajay Guru: Department of Cariology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 600 077, Tamilnadu, India.
  8. Jesu Arockiaraj: Toxicology and Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Humanities, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur 603 203, Chengalpattu District, Tamilnadu, India.

Abstract

Background: Bone substitutes have been used by doctors for a long time to treat osseous abnormalities. Recently, scientists have been searching for suitable materials to replace bone. Autogenous bone grafts are considered the gold standard for osseous regeneration. However, the limited availability of intraoral sources for grafting material often requires the use of secondary donor sites.
Aim: This study aims to compare a control group of standard critical bone defect models treated without any bone transplants to critical size calvarial bony defects treated with various bone replacements, including simvastatin and α-tricalcium phosphate, while analyzing the healing patterns.
Materials and Methods: In this investigation, 24 Wistar Albino rats weighing 200-250 g were utilized. The study included four groups, each consisting of six rats. Group I utilized deproteinized bovine xenograft, Group II used Simvastatin (0.1 mg), Group III used Simvastatin (0.1 mg) plus TCP, and Group IV served as the untreated calvarial defects group. After eight weeks of testing, the rats were euthanized, and the calvaria were extracted, decalcified in 20% formic acid, and prepared for histological analysis.
Results: The newly produced osseous tissue consisted of woven and lamellar bone, which was observed in all deformities. The mean widths of new bone development in the SIMV with α-TCP (Group III) group after XENO (Group I) and the control group with no graft implantation were 160.33 ± 16.2 µm, 110.59 ± 11.5 µm, and 50.83 ± 5.5 µm, respectively. However, these differences did not show statistical significance (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: The quantity and quality of newly produced osseous tissue were comparable in α-TCP with SIMV and XENO. However, inflammatory infiltration was 8more pronounced in regions where SIMV was present alone compared to the combination group.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Mater. 1994;16(2):91-8 [PMID: 10147328]
  2. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Aug;(168):230-42 [PMID: 7049486]
  3. J Periodontol. 2001 Feb;72(2):152-9 [PMID: 11288787]
  4. J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Nov;29(11):2307-22 [PMID: 25264148]
  5. West J Med. 1984 Jul;141(1):71-87 [PMID: 6475045]
  6. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(5):601-4 [PMID: 12209906]
  7. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 Mar 5;59(3):422-8 [PMID: 11774299]
  8. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Dec;262:109463 [PMID: 36087706]
  9. J Periodontol. 1998 Jun;69(6):655-63 [PMID: 9660334]
  10. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Mar;20(3):280-7 [PMID: 19397639]
  11. J Clin Periodontol. 1999 Jul;26(7):421-8 [PMID: 10412845]
  12. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990 Mar;24(3):379-96 [PMID: 2318901]
  13. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000 Apr;50(1):67-74 [PMID: 10644965]
  14. J Periodontol. 1996 Oct;67(10):1025-33 [PMID: 8910843]
  15. Periodontol 2000. 2015 Jun;68(1):182-216 [PMID: 25867987]
  16. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000 Mar 5;49(3):415-21 [PMID: 10602075]
  17. Open Dent J. 2011;5:96-104 [PMID: 21760862]
  18. Orthop Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;31(3):389-98 [PMID: 10882465]
  19. Matrix. 1992 Nov;12(5):369-80 [PMID: 1484504]
  20. Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Jan;12(1):253-62 [PMID: 22889599]
  21. J Periodontol. 1996 Feb;67(2):150-7 [PMID: 8667135]
  22. Life Sci. 2022 Jun 1;298:120507 [PMID: 35358593]
  23. J Craniofac Surg. 1990 Jan;1(1):60-8 [PMID: 1965154]
  24. Am J Orthod. 1984 Aug;86(2):95-111 [PMID: 6589962]
  25. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994 Jan-Feb;9(1):13-29 [PMID: 8150509]
  26. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2001;12(1):107-24 [PMID: 11334185]
  27. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Jan-Feb;16(1):105-14 [PMID: 11280355]
  28. J Periodontol. 1977 Sep;48(9):570-6 [PMID: 333090]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0boneGroupgrouposseoususedHoweverstudycalvarialratsSimvastatinSIMVα-TCPBonestandardregenerationcontrolcriticaldefecttreateddefectssimvastatinα-tricalciumphosphateutilized01 mgIIInewlyproducedtissueXENO5 µmBackground:substitutesdoctorslongtimetreatabnormalitiesRecentlyscientistssearchingsuitablematerialsreplaceAutogenousgraftsconsideredgoldlimitedavailabilityintraoralsourcesgraftingmaterialoftenrequiresusesecondarydonorsitesAim:aimscomparemodelswithouttransplantssizebonyvariousreplacementsincludinganalyzinghealingpatternsMaterialsMethods:investigation24WistarAlbinoweighing200-250 gincludedfourgroupsconsistingsixdeproteinizedbovinexenograftIIplusTCPIVserveduntreatedeightweekstestingeuthanizedcalvariaextracteddecalcified20%formicacidpreparedhistologicalanalysisResults:consistedwovenlamellarobserveddeformitiesmeanwidthsnewdevelopmentgraftimplantation16033 ± 162 µm11059 ± 115083 ± 5respectivelydifferencesshowstatisticalsignificancep > 005Conclusions:quantityqualitycomparableinflammatoryinfiltration8morepronouncedregionspresentalonecomparedcombinationRoleindividualcombinedimpactratdefect:experimentalCalvarialXenograft

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)