Paradoxical leadership and well-being in turbulent times: a time-lagged study.

Dave Stynen, Judith Semeijn
Author Information
  1. Dave Stynen: Department of Organization, Faculty of Management, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Netherlands.
  2. Judith Semeijn: Department of Organization, Faculty of Management, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Netherlands.

Abstract

Introduction: Paradoxical leadership has recently been put forward as an approach to leadership that may transcend the inherent contradictions in contemporary organizational and personnel management. Empirical research on its potential role for bolstering employee well-being remains scarce. This study investigated whether paradoxical leadership positively impacts employee well-being, which is operationalized as employees' job, career and life satisfaction. We rely on sense-making theory to investigate whether such effects are mediated by the mitigation of employee job insecurity perceptions.
Methods: Convenience sampling techniques were used to collect longitudinal survey data between March and September 2021. In total 287 workers provided usable data. Their ages ranged from 18 to 67 years and were active in various organizations in the Netherlands. Validated measures were used to assess paradoxical leadership, job insecurity, job, career, and life satisfaction. A time-lagged path analysis in Mplus 7.0 was conducted to investigate relationships.
Results: The results suggest that paradoxical leadership is positively related to job, career and life satisfaction over time. The relationships between paradoxical leadership and job and career satisfaction are partially mediated by the mitigation of perceived job insecurity.
Discussion: Paradoxical leadership plays a role in fostering worker well-being in these turbulent times. Paradoxical leaders may also help their followers to reframe and better deal with challenging working conditions. Despite the longitudinal data design, an additional data-wave would allow for more stringent testing of the proposed mediation effect, and due to convenience sampling generalization of findings is limited.

Keywords

References

  1. J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):183-194 [PMID: 32167788]
  2. Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 16;12:753116 [PMID: 34975645]
  3. J Appl Psychol. 2023 May;108(5):850-870 [PMID: 36222634]
  4. Attach Hum Dev. 2005 Dec;7(4):369-80 [PMID: 16332581]
  5. Australas Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;24(6):589-591 [PMID: 27385364]
  6. Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 02;9:1083 [PMID: 30013498]
  7. Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):64-82 [PMID: 11928891]
  8. Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173 [PMID: 37131927]
  9. Heliyon. 2023 Feb 23;9(3):e13918 [PMID: 36915497]
  10. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Dec 07;14:1959-1970 [PMID: 34916857]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 20;17(1): [PMID: 31861812]
  12. Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Jan-Feb;58(1):189-194 [PMID: 36787513]
  13. Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46 [PMID: 2320703]
  14. J Occup Health Psychol. 2002 Jul;7(3):242-64 [PMID: 12148956]
  15. J Nurs Manag. 2012 Jul;20(5):582-91 [PMID: 22823213]
  16. Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 14;8:1938 [PMID: 29184517]
  17. J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jul 1;63(7):581-587 [PMID: 33769333]
  18. Am Psychol. 1989 Mar;44(3):513-24 [PMID: 2648906]
  19. J Appl Psychol. 2000 Feb;85(1):65-74 [PMID: 10740957]
  20. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012 Jan;17(1):15-27 [PMID: 22409390]
  21. J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):499-512 [PMID: 11419809]
  22. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5 [PMID: 16367493]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 24;16(15): [PMID: 31344856]
  24. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4): [PMID: 32059578]
  25. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78 [PMID: 11392867]
  26. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539-69 [PMID: 21838546]
  27. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 10;18(6): [PMID: 33802094]
  28. J Occup Environ Med. 2022 Dec 1;64(12):985-993 [PMID: 36069851]
  29. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Mar;27(3):324-332 [PMID: 29048981]
  30. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:537756 [PMID: 33071857]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0leadershipjobsatisfactionwell-beingparadoxicalcareerParadoxicallifeinsecurityemployeedatamayrolestudywhetherpositivelysense-makingtheoryinvestigatemediatedmitigationsamplingusedlongitudinaltime-laggedrelationshipsturbulentIntroduction:recentlyputforwardapproachtranscendinherentcontradictionscontemporaryorganizationalpersonnelmanagementEmpiricalresearchpotentialbolsteringremainsscarceinvestigatedimpactsoperationalizedemployees'relyeffectsperceptionsMethods:ConveniencetechniquescollectsurveyMarchSeptember2021total287workersprovidedusableagesranged1867yearsactivevariousorganizationsNetherlandsValidatedmeasuresassesspathanalysisMplus70conductedResults:resultssuggestrelatedtimepartiallyperceivedDiscussion:playsfosteringworkertimesleadersalsohelpfollowersreframebetterdealchallengingworkingconditionsDespitedesignadditionaldata-waveallowstringenttestingproposedmediationeffectdueconveniencegeneralizationfindingslimitedtimes:

Similar Articles

Cited By