Delivery of a community-based peer mentorship program for people with spinal cord injury at a rehabilitation center.

Zhiyang Shi, Jacques Comeau, Gordon A Bloom, Heather Gainforth, Aliki Thomas, Shane N Sweet
Author Information
  1. Zhiyang Shi: Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  2. Jacques Comeau: Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  3. Gordon A Bloom: Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  4. Heather Gainforth: School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
  5. Aliki Thomas: Centre for Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Research in Metropolitan Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  6. Shane N Sweet: Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Abstract

Introduction: Community-based spinal cord injury (SCI) organizations deliver peer mentorship programs in rehabilitation settings. Little is known on how these programs are delivered through the collaboration between community-based SCI organizations and rehabilitation institutions. This study aimed to identify barriers, facilitators, and collaboration processes within a SCI peer mentorship program provided by a community-based organization at a rehabilitation center.
Methods: A qualitative case study design was applied. Seven participants were recruited, including two mentees, two mentors, one program director of the community-based SCI organization, and two healthcare professionals of the rehabilitation center. Each participant completed a one-on-one interview. Data were analyzed inductively and deductively based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Results: Ten factors were identified to influence the delivery of the peer mentorship program, including nine CFIR constructs. Successful delivery of the program required strong, collaborative inter-professional relationships between health professionals and community organizational staff (e.g., peer mentors) as facilitators; whereas potential cost, minimal patient needs, and limited mentor resources were found to be barriers. Engaging health professionals by initiating communications, reflecting and evaluating the program collectively with health professionals were important collaboration processes for the community-based organization to maintain effective partnership with the rehabilitation center.
Discussion: The collaboration processes and strategies to addressing/leveraging the barriers and facilitators may inform evidence-based practice to establish and optimize the delivery of SCI peer mentorship programs in various rehabilitation settings.

Keywords

References

  1. Implement Sci. 2016 May 17;11:72 [PMID: 27189233]
  2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 24;13:486 [PMID: 24267663]
  3. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):803 [PMID: 31234804]
  4. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Nov;44(22):6824-6832 [PMID: 34613859]
  5. J Adv Nurs. 2009 Sep;65(9):1946-55 [PMID: 19694858]
  6. J Interprof Care. 2011 Jan;25(1):53-8 [PMID: 20795836]
  7. Spinal Cord. 2021 Dec;59(12):1285-1293 [PMID: 34645921]
  8. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Aug;99(8):1691-1692 [PMID: 29655513]
  9. J Clin Nurs. 2011 Feb;20(3-4):351-8 [PMID: 21219518]
  10. Rehabil Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;44(2):123-127 [PMID: 30830010]
  11. Spinal Cord. 2021 Dec;59(12):1301-1308 [PMID: 34732859]
  12. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):840 [PMID: 31727067]
  13. Spinal Cord. 2019 Oct;57(10):881-889 [PMID: 31123334]
  14. BMC Public Health. 2017 Oct 23;17(1):835 [PMID: 29061140]
  15. Spinal Cord. 2013 Apr;51(4):295-9 [PMID: 23184023]
  16. J Spinal Cord Med. 2021 May;44(3):383-391 [PMID: 31403374]
  17. Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 29;14(1):42 [PMID: 31036028]
  18. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2019 Fall;25(4):303-315 [PMID: 31844382]
  19. Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75 [PMID: 36309746]
  20. Implement Sci. 2020 Feb 14;15(1):11 [PMID: 32059738]
  21. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug;98(8):1526-1534.e2 [PMID: 28342829]
  22. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50 [PMID: 19664226]
  23. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57 [PMID: 17872937]
  24. Psychol Health. 2022 Apr;37(4):523-544 [PMID: 33754920]
  25. Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Apr 18;3(1):45 [PMID: 35436923]
  26. Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Sep 8;3(1):97 [PMID: 36076250]
  27. J Health Organ Manag. 2016;30(1):2-30 [PMID: 26964847]
  28. Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Nov 24;3(1):123 [PMID: 36424640]
  29. Implement Sci. 2022 Jun 1;17(1):36 [PMID: 35650618]
  30. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Apr;28(2):303-314 [PMID: 34611962]
  31. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76 [PMID: 20957426]
  32. Implement Sci. 2021 Nov 20;16(1):99 [PMID: 34801041]
  33. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014 Fall;20(4):249-64 [PMID: 25477739]
  34. J Interprof Care. 2008 Aug;22(4):417-28 [PMID: 18800282]
  35. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2015 Jul;148(4):176-9 [PMID: 26448769]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0rehabilitationpeerprogramSCImentorshipcommunity-basedcollaborationcenterprofessionalsspinalcordinjuryprogramsbarriersfacilitatorsprocessesorganizationtwodeliveryhealthorganizationssettingsstudyqualitativeincludingmentorsCFIRcommunityIntroduction:Community-baseddeliverLittleknowndeliveredinstitutionsaimedidentifywithinprovidedMethods:casedesignappliedSevenparticipantsrecruitedmenteesonedirectorhealthcareparticipantcompletedone-on-oneinterviewDataanalyzedinductivelydeductivelybasedConsolidatedFrameworkImplementationResearchResults:TenfactorsidentifiedinfluencenineconstructsSuccessfulrequiredstrongcollaborativeinter-professionalrelationshipsorganizationalstaffegwhereaspotentialcostminimalpatientneedslimitedmentorresourcesfoundEngaginginitiatingcommunicationsreflectingevaluatingcollectivelyimportantmaintaineffectivepartnershipDiscussion:strategiesaddressing/leveragingmayinformevidence-basedpracticeestablishoptimizevariousDeliverypeopleservicessupportresearch

Similar Articles

Cited By