Trying harder: how cognitive effort sculpts neural representations during working memory.

Sarah L Master, Shanshan Li, Clayton E Curtis
Author Information
  1. Sarah L Master: Department of Psychology, New York University. ORCID
  2. Shanshan Li: Department of Psychology, New York University. ORCID
  3. Clayton E Curtis: Department of Psychology, New York University. ORCID

Abstract

The neural mechanisms by which motivational factors influence cognition remain unknown. Using fMRI, we tested how cognitive effort impacts working memory (WM). Participants were precued whether WM difficulty would be hard or easy. Hard trials demanded more effort as a later decision required finer mnemonic precision. Behaviorally, pupil size was larger and response times were slower on hard trials suggesting our manipulation of effort succeeded. Neurally, we observed robust persistent activity in prefrontal cortex, especially during hard trials. We found strong decoding of location in visual cortex, where accuracy was higher on hard trials. Connecting these across-region effects, we found that the amplitude of delay period activity in frontal cortex predicted decoded accuracy in visual cortex on a trial-wise basis. We conclude that the gain of persistent activity in frontal cortex may be the source of effort-related feedback signals that improve the quality of WM representations stored in visual cortex.

Keywords

References

  1. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Jun;21(3):453-471 [PMID: 33409959]
  2. PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Apr 29;20(4):e1012060 [PMID: 38683857]
  3. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Aug;88:102065 [PMID: 34274800]
  4. J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Oct;127(7):695-709 [PMID: 30335439]
  5. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010 Feb 1;19(1):51-57 [PMID: 20445769]
  6. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):173-80 [PMID: 16326021]
  7. Neuron. 2007 Oct 25;56(2):366-83 [PMID: 17964252]
  8. Nat Neurosci. 2014 Mar;17(3):347-56 [PMID: 24569831]
  9. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2003;15(2):55-66 [PMID: 12566593]
  10. Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1484-525 [PMID: 21549742]
  11. J Neurosci. 2007 May 16;27(20):5326-37 [PMID: 17507555]
  12. J Vis. 2009 Sep 09;9(10):7.1-11 [PMID: 19810788]
  13. Neuron. 2021 Nov 17;109(22):3699-3712.e6 [PMID: 34525327]
  14. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 21;7(1):6188 [PMID: 28733684]
  15. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr;20(2):177-82 [PMID: 20362427]
  16. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Sep 1;116(3):1049-54 [PMID: 27306678]
  17. Nature. 1997 Apr 10;386(6625):604-8 [PMID: 9121583]
  18. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124 [PMID: 28375769]
  19. Psychol Res. 2000;63(3-4):212-33 [PMID: 11004877]
  20. Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Apr;35(7):1024-35 [PMID: 22487033]
  21. Neuron. 2013 Jul 24;79(2):217-40 [PMID: 23889930]
  22. Science. 2008 Aug 8;321(5890):851-4 [PMID: 18687968]
  23. Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 5;12(1):4714 [PMID: 34354071]
  24. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun;15(2):395-415 [PMID: 25673005]
  25. PLoS One. 2010 Dec 20;5(12):e15710 [PMID: 21187930]
  26. Neuroimage. 1997 Jan;5(1):49-62 [PMID: 9038284]
  27. Sci Adv. 2022 Jun 10;8(23):eabc8812 [PMID: 35687684]
  28. Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81-97 [PMID: 13310704]
  29. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):665-82 [PMID: 20853993]
  30. Magn Reson Med. 2010 May;63(5):1144-53 [PMID: 20432285]
  31. Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 15;12(1):1030 [PMID: 33589626]
  32. Nat Neurosci. 2010 Dec;13(12):1554-9 [PMID: 21057509]
  33. Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:102-122 [PMID: 28987923]
  34. Netw Neurosci. 2020 Feb 01;4(1):30-69 [PMID: 32043043]
  35. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:115-42 [PMID: 25251486]
  36. J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jan 5;34(2):365-379 [PMID: 34942647]
  37. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Jul 15;74(2):130-6 [PMID: 23394903]
  38. Science. 1966 Dec 23;154(3756):1583-5 [PMID: 5924930]
  39. Neuroimage. 2022 Jul 1;254:119139 [PMID: 35346841]
  40. Elife. 2018 Aug 07;7: [PMID: 30084356]
  41. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 May;14(5):216-22 [PMID: 20381406]
  42. Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 15;39(2):647-60 [PMID: 17977024]
  43. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Dec;18(12):1728-30 [PMID: 26502262]
  44. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):131-41 [PMID: 23230991]
  45. Vis cogn. 2017;25(7-8):691-702 [PMID: 30760947]
  46. Front Neural Circuits. 2021 Jul 21;15:696060 [PMID: 34366794]
  47. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):337-349 [PMID: 29477776]
  48. Elife. 2017 Jun 19;6: [PMID: 28628004]
  49. Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Dec;2(12):899-908 [PMID: 30988433]
  50. Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:991-1001 [PMID: 23899722]
  51. Psychophysiology. 2017 May;54(5):724-735 [PMID: 28127779]
  52. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42 [PMID: 9176953]
  53. Vision Res. 2014 Dec;105:70-6 [PMID: 25240420]
  54. J Neurosci. 2014 Oct 8;34(41):13747-56 [PMID: 25297101]
  55. Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 1;104:430-6 [PMID: 25234118]
  56. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2015 Nov 24;1:373-391 [PMID: 28532368]
  57. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Sep;7(9):415-423 [PMID: 12963473]
  58. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Nov;12(11):1463-8 [PMID: 19801987]
  59. Cortex. 2023 Mar;160:115-133 [PMID: 36841093]
  60. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 May;23(2):107-131 [PMID: 29591537]
  61. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jun 21;113(25):6967-72 [PMID: 27274075]
  62. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Feb;19:83-90 [PMID: 30035206]
  63. J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 19;32(38):12990-8 [PMID: 22993416]
  64. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;30:102617 [PMID: 33752077]
  65. J Neurosci. 2016 Mar 9;36(10):2847-56 [PMID: 26961941]
  66. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 [PMID: 9176952]
  67. Neuroreport. 1997 Jan 20;8(2):545-9 [PMID: 9080445]
  68. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(1):1-23 [PMID: 15935475]
  69. Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):455-68 [PMID: 17920934]

Grants

  1. R01 EY016407/NEI NIH HHS
  2. R01 EY027925/NEI NIH HHS
  3. R01 EY033925/NEI NIH HHS
  4. T32 EY007136/NEI NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cortexefforthardtrialscognitiveworkingmemoryWMactivityvisualneuralfMRIpersistentfounddecodingaccuracyfrontalrepresentationsmechanismsmotivationalfactorsinfluencecognitionremainunknownUsingtestedimpactsParticipantsprecuedwhetherdifficultyeasyHarddemandedlaterdecisionrequiredfinermnemonicprecisionBehaviorallypupilsizelargerresponsetimesslowersuggestingmanipulationsucceededNeurallyobservedrobustprefrontalespeciallystronglocationhigherConnectingacross-regioneffectsamplitudedelayperiodpredicteddecodedtrial-wisebasisconcludegainmaysourceeffort-relatedfeedbacksignalsimprovequalitystoredTryingharder:sculptshumanmodelingretinotopy

Similar Articles

Cited By