How to Achieve a Healthy City: a Scoping Review with Ten City Examples.

Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat, Ayyoob Sharifi
Author Information
  1. Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat: School of the Built Environment, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK. aziafati-bafarasat@brookes.ac.uk. ORCID
  2. Ayyoob Sharifi: The IDEC Institute & Network for Education and Research On Peace and Sustainability (NERPS), Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan. ORCID

Abstract

This scoping review of the literature explores the following question: what systematic measures are needed to achieve a healthy city? The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests 11 characteristics of a healthy city. Measures contributing to these characteristics are extracted and classified into 29 themes. Implementation of some of these measures is illustrated by examples from Freiburg, Greater Vancouver, Singapore, Seattle, New York City, London, Nantes, Exeter, Copenhagen, and Washington, DC. The identified measures and examples indicate that a healthy city is a system of healthy sectors. A discussion section suggests healthy directions for nine sectors in a healthy city. These sectors include transportation, housing, schools, city planning, local government, environmental management, retail, heritage, and healthcare. Future work is advised to put more focus on characteristic 5 (i.e., the meeting of basic needs for all the city's people) and characteristic 10 (i.e., public health and sick care services accessible to all) of a healthy city.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Health Geogr. 2021 Aug 18;20(1):36 [PMID: 34407828]
  2. Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2936-2947 [PMID: 27671670]
  3. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1291-4 [PMID: 25034198]
  4. Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1478-83 [PMID: 12948966]
  5. Ageing Soc. 2014 Mar;34(3):472-494 [PMID: 24478532]
  6. J Urban Health. 2013 Oct;90 Suppl 1:74-91 [PMID: 22125115]
  7. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 20;13(2):e0193013 [PMID: 29462194]
  8. Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2925-2935 [PMID: 27671671]
  9. Psychiatr Serv. 2000 Apr;51(4):487-93 [PMID: 10737824]
  10. Acad Pediatr. 2021 Nov-Dec;21(8S):S184-S193 [PMID: 34740427]
  11. Milbank Q. 2009 Jun;87(2):495-534 [PMID: 19523126]
  12. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Dec;4(4):491-503 [PMID: 29052114]
  13. Int J Health Geogr. 2004 Feb 26;3(1):3 [PMID: 14987337]
  14. Am J Public Health. 2002 May;92(5):758-68 [PMID: 11988443]
  15. Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 11;10(1):311 [PMID: 34895329]
  16. Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2912-2924 [PMID: 27671668]
  17. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1999 Dec 10;119(30):4530-4 [PMID: 10827498]
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jul;57(2):239-51 [PMID: 12765705]
  19. Health Place. 2012 Jul;18(4):841-53 [PMID: 22503565]
  20. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  21. Health Promot Int. 2009 Nov;24 Suppl 1:i45-i55 [PMID: 19914988]

MeSH Term

Humans
Cities
Public Health
New York City
Delivery of Health Care
Health Status
City Planning

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthycitymeasuressectorshealthWorldHealthOrganizationWHOsuggestscharacteristicsexamplesCityplanningcharacteristicieHealthyUrbanscopingreviewliteratureexploresfollowingquestion:systematicneededachievecity?11Measurescontributingextractedclassified29themesImplementationillustratedFreiburgGreaterVancouverSingaporeSeattleNewYorkLondonNantesExeterCopenhagenWashingtonDCidentifiedindicatesystemdiscussionsectiondirectionsnineincludetransportationhousingschoolslocalgovernmentenvironmentalmanagementretailheritagehealthcareFutureworkadvisedputmore focus5meetingbasicneedscity'speople and10publicsickcareservicesaccessibleAchieveCity:ScopingReviewTenExamplescitiesPublicSustainabledevelopment

Similar Articles

Cited By