U.S. nursing home leadership experiences with COVID-19 and its impact on residents and staff: A qualitative analysis.

Catherine E Dubé, Natalia Nielsen, Emily McPhillips, J Lee Hargraves, Carol Cosenza, Bill Jesdale, Kate L Lapane
Author Information
  1. Catherine E Dubé: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America. ORCID
  2. Natalia Nielsen: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  3. Emily McPhillips: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America. ORCID
  4. J Lee Hargraves: Department of Family Medicine and Community Health University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  5. Carol Cosenza: Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  6. Bill Jesdale: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  7. Kate L Lapane: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore experiences of U.S. (United States) nursing home leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic in their efforts to address resident loneliness and social isolation and to elicit stories about personal and professional impacts on themselves and staff.
DESIGN: Qualitative inquiry via three optional open-ended questions appended to a national self-administered survey of American nursing home leaders was employed. Textual data was analyzed using an iterative reflexive thematic approach.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A stratified sample frame defined by facility size (beds: 30-99, 100+) and quality ratings (1, 2-4, 5) was employed. Web survey links and paper surveys were sent to 1,676 nursing home directors of nursing between February and May 2022.
RESULTS: Open text responses were collected from 271 nursing homes. Broad themes included: 1) Addressing needs of residents & families; 2) Challenges; and 3) Personal experiences of nursing home leadership/staff. Respondents described trauma to residents, staff, and leadership. Resident loneliness was addressed using existing and newer technologies and innovative indoor and outdoor activities. Residents experienced fear, illness, loss, and sometimes death. Isolation from family and lack of touch were particularly difficult. Regulations were seen as punitive while ignoring emotional needs of residents. Staffing challenges and pressures to do more with less created additional stress. Leadership and staff made significant sacrifices resulting in physical, social, and emotional consequences. Beneficial outcomes included staff bonding, professional growth, and permanent implementation of new interventions.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: New and creative interventions were successfully implemented to address social isolation and loneliness. Improved Wi-Fi and other nursing home infrastructure upgrades are needed to maintain them. Reimagining often conflicting overlapping federal, state, and local regulations, grounding them in good clinical judgement, and incentivizing performance improvement should be considered. Trauma experienced by staff needs to be addressed to deal with current and future workforce needs.

References

  1. Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jan;30(1):e148-e160 [PMID: 34013986]
  2. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jul;21(7):966-967 [PMID: 32505516]
  3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 21;5:CD013632 [PMID: 32441330]
  4. Nurs Clin North Am. 2022 Jun;57(2):273-286 [PMID: 35659988]
  5. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Sep-Oct;102:104728 [PMID: 35597183]
  6. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):228-237.e25 [PMID: 33347846]
  7. J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Jul;42(7):1574-1581 [PMID: 36748259]
  8. Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun;58(3):686-696 [PMID: 36416209]
  9. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2022;51(3):233-240 [PMID: 35679835]
  10. Int J Older People Nurs. 2022 Nov;17(6):e12483 [PMID: 35699305]
  11. JMIR Aging. 2022 Jan 12;5(1):e32442 [PMID: 34878989]
  12. Psychol Rep. 2006 Apr;98(2):585-601 [PMID: 16796118]
  13. Eur Geriatr Med. 2021 Dec;12(6):1127-1136 [PMID: 34136990]
  14. Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211044287 [PMID: 34612063]
  15. BMC Nurs. 2022 Feb 10;21(1):41 [PMID: 35139842]
  16. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2065-2071 [PMID: 31334567]
  17. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Mar 10;12(1):1882781 [PMID: 33968317]
  18. J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(9):938-947 [PMID: 33155618]
  19. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;28(12):1299-1307 [PMID: 33004262]
  20. Aust Health Rev. 2008 Aug;32(3):468-78 [PMID: 18666874]
  21. JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):619-620 [PMID: 32692848]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;20(1): [PMID: 36612481]
  23. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023 May-Jun;21:101298 [PMID: 37073375]
  24. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2020 Oct 14;6:2333721420962669 [PMID: 33110931]
  25. Fam Pract. 2022 Jul 19;39(4):785-789 [PMID: 34849754]
  26. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Nov;23(11):1827-1832 [PMID: 36084690]
  27. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(4):381-2 [PMID: 16396413]
  28. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Jan;55(1):226-238 [PMID: 36464814]
  29. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Aug;24(8):1127-1132.e6 [PMID: 37355245]
  30. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Nov 4;2020:8870249 [PMID: 33204723]
  31. BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):164 [PMID: 36959576]
  32. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Nov;68(11):2462-2466 [PMID: 32770832]
  33. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 7;118(1): [PMID: 33323526]
  34. J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Jun;41(6):1547-1556 [PMID: 35416076]
  35. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0247139 [PMID: 33596273]
  36. J Adv Nurs. 2022 Aug;78(8):2495-2506 [PMID: 35285060]
  37. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Nov-Dec;55(3):548-54 [PMID: 22487148]
  38. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Sep-Oct;102:104745 [PMID: 35714475]
  39. Nurs Econ. 2012 May-Jun;30(3):163-6 [PMID: 22849015]
  40. Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):78-83 [PMID: 23032355]

Grants

  1. R01 AG071692/NIA NIH HHS
  2. TL1 TR001454/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
United States
COVID-19
Leadership
Pandemics
Nursing Homes
Skilled Nursing Facilities

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nursinghomestaffneedsresidentsexperiencesleadershiplonelinesssocial1USCOVID-19addressisolationprofessionalsurveyemployedusingANDaddressedexperiencedemotionalinterventionsOBJECTIVES:exploreUnitedStatespandemiceffortsresidentelicitstoriespersonalimpactsDESIGN:Qualitativeinquiryviathreeoptionalopen-endedquestionsappendednationalself-administeredAmericanleadersTextualdataanalyzediterativereflexivethematicapproachSETTINGPARTICIPANTS:stratifiedsampleframedefinedfacilitysizebeds:30-99100+qualityratings2-45Weblinkspapersurveyssent676directorsFebruaryMay2022RESULTS:Opentextresponsescollected271homesBroadthemesincluded:Addressing&families2Challenges3Personalleadership/staffRespondentsdescribedtraumaResidentexistingnewertechnologiesinnovativeindooroutdooractivitiesResidentsfearillnesslosssometimesdeathIsolationfamilylacktouchparticularlydifficultRegulationsseenpunitiveignoringStaffingchallengespressureslesscreatedadditionalstressLeadershipmadesignificantsacrificesresultingphysicalconsequencesBeneficialoutcomesincludedbondinggrowthpermanentimplementationnewCONCLUSIONSIMPLICATIONS:NewcreativesuccessfullyimplementedImprovedWi-FiinfrastructureupgradesneededmaintainReimaginingoftenconflictingoverlappingfederalstatelocalregulationsgroundinggoodclinicaljudgementincentivizingperformanceimprovementconsideredTraumadealcurrentfutureworkforceimpactstaff:qualitativeanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By