Chinese version of exercise dependence scale-revised: psychometric analysis and exploration of risk factors.

Yingbo Shao, Haoyu Zhang, Xiaonan Zhang, Qian Liang, Hui Zhang, Feifei Zhang
Author Information
  1. Yingbo Shao: Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
  2. Haoyu Zhang: Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
  3. Xiaonan Zhang: Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
  4. Qian Liang: Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
  5. Hui Zhang: Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
  6. Feifei Zhang: Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

Abstract

Introduction: Exercise addiction (EA) is a dysfunctional behavior characterized by exaggerated training which has adverse effects on physiology and psychology. To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Exercise Dependence Scale-Revised (EDS-R) and the social and psychological aspects related to EA, a large sample behavioral study was conducted.
Methods: College students were selected as the target group. All of them were asked to finish the scales about exercise, including the Chinese version of EDS-R and the Motives for Physical Activity Measure-Revised scales. A confirmatory factor analysis, Mann-Whitney U test, and hierarchical regression test were performed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of EDS-R and find the explanatory variables of EA.
Results: A total of 837 (556 female) students with a mean age of 20.38 years were recruited in the present study. The Chinese version of EDS-R showed good reliability and validity (McDonald's = 0.973, CR = 0.99, AVE = 0.80) in Chinese college students. EA was positively correlated with exercise frequency and ability motivation across the study sample. Besides, the Mann-Whitney U test revealed that the exercise motivation difference is the primary cause of the gender gap in EA.
Conclusion: The Chinese version of EDS-R is a relatively robust and accurate instrument to assess the risk of EA. Additionally, exercise frequency and motivation may be the potential risk factors for EA. The screening of risk factors is of great significance for the early detection and prevention of EA.

Keywords

References

  1. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Sep;37(8):1622-44 [PMID: 23806439]
  2. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 17;99(35):2773-2776 [PMID: 31550801]
  3. BMJ. 2017 Apr 26;357:j1745 [PMID: 28446435]
  4. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Jan 26;7:7 [PMID: 20181017]
  5. J Adv Nurs. 2020 Sep;76(9):2209-2211 [PMID: 32323338]
  6. Eat Weight Disord. 2022 May;27(4):1427-1436 [PMID: 34370271]
  7. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 11;17(11): [PMID: 32545197]
  8. Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Oct;27(7):2801-2809 [PMID: 35776380]
  9. JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):2020-2028 [PMID: 30418471]
  10. Encephale. 2008 Oct;34(5):490-5 [PMID: 19068338]
  11. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1423-34 [PMID: 17762377]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 27;19(11): [PMID: 35682107]
  13. J Pers Assess. 2020 Mar-Apr;102(2):293-295 [PMID: 31951745]
  14. Sports Med. 2013 Feb;43(2):111-9 [PMID: 23329605]
  15. Nutr Hosp. 2023 Oct 27;: [PMID: 37929842]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 14;18(6): [PMID: 33799357]
  17. Sports (Basel). 2019 Feb 25;7(2): [PMID: 30823528]
  18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 03;19(7): [PMID: 35409963]
  19. Sports Med. 2019 Feb;49(2):319-330 [PMID: 30374944]
  20. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012 Jun;83(2):318-29 [PMID: 22808718]
  21. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(8):755-66 [PMID: 22420455]
  22. J Phys Act Health. 2013 Feb;10(2):176-84 [PMID: 23407442]
  23. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jun 22;9:78 [PMID: 22726453]
  24. Psychiatr Q. 2018 Dec;89(4):983-990 [PMID: 30116967]
  25. J Behav Addict. 2016 Jun;5(2):325-31 [PMID: 27363466]
  26. J Behav Addict. 2012 Dec;1(4):186-90 [PMID: 26165606]
  27. Span J Psychol. 2011 May;14(1):421-31 [PMID: 21568198]
  28. Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):64-82 [PMID: 11928891]
  29. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(25):4062-9 [PMID: 24001300]
  30. J Health Psychol. 2006 Nov;11(6):887-903 [PMID: 17035261]
  31. Nutrients. 2014 Nov 05;6(11):4895-905 [PMID: 25379689]
  32. Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):205-224 [PMID: 35185157]
  33. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;14(2):139-45 [PMID: 21936763]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EAChineseexerciseversionEDS-Rreliabilityvaliditytestmotivationriskstudystudents=0factorsExerciseaddictionsamplescalesanalysisMann-WhitneyUfrequencypsychometricIntroduction:dysfunctionalbehaviorcharacterizedexaggeratedtrainingadverseeffectsphysiologypsychologyexamineDependenceScale-RevisedsocialpsychologicalaspectsrelatedlargebehavioralconductedMethods:CollegeselectedtargetgroupaskedfinishincludingMotivesPhysicalActivityMeasure-RevisedconfirmatoryfactorhierarchicalregressionperformedfindexplanatoryvariablesResults:total837556femalemeanage2038yearsrecruitedpresentshowedgoodMcDonald's973CR99AVE80collegepositivelycorrelatedabilityacrossBesidesrevealeddifferenceprimarycausegendergapConclusion:relativelyrobustaccurateinstrumentassessAdditionallymaypotentialscreeninggreatsignificanceearlydetectionpreventiondependencescale-revised:exploration

Similar Articles

Cited By