A model of the interrelationship between research ethics and research integrity.

Abdulghani Muthanna, Youmen Chaaban, Saba Qadhi
Author Information
  1. Abdulghani Muthanna: Department of Teacher Education, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. ORCID
  2. Youmen Chaaban: Educational Research Center, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
  3. Saba Qadhi: Core Curriculum Program, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore the interrelationship between research ethics and research integrity with a focus on the primary forms of research misconduct, including plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification. It also details the main factors for their occurrence, and the possible ways for mitigating their use among scholars. The method employed a detailed examination of the main ethical dilemmas, as delineated in literature, as well as the factors leading to these ethical breaches and the strategies to mitigate them. Further, the teaching experiences of the primary author are reflected in the development of the model. The results of this article are represented in a model illustrating the interrelationship between research ethics and research integrity. Further, a significant aspect of our article is the identification of novel forms of research misconduct concerning the use of irrelevant or forced citations or references. In conclusion, the article highlights the substantial positive effects that adherence to research ethics and integrity have on the academic well-being of scholars.

Keywords

References

  1. Account Res. 2023 Jan 25;:1-9 [PMID: 36697395]
  2. Front Psychol. 2015 May 19;6:621 [PMID: 26042061]
  3. Account Res. 2019 Feb;26(2):108-122 [PMID: 30595069]
  4. Account Res. 2013;20(5-6):320-38 [PMID: 24028480]
  5. Account Res. 2023 Mar 11;:1-10 [PMID: 36888916]
  6. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Oct 1;87(2):225-7 [PMID: 23958142]
  7. Account Res. 2015;22(5):249-66 [PMID: 25928177]
  8. J Int Med Res. 2016 Dec;44(6):1212-1221 [PMID: 27834306]
  9. Indian J Microbiol. 2015 Sep;55(3):341-4 [PMID: 26063945]
  10. Account Res. 2016;23(5):280-7 [PMID: 26890365]
  11. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23(1):16-8 [PMID: 23457762]
  12. Account Res. 2020 Oct;27(7):457-475 [PMID: 32438829]
  13. Account Res. 2018 Oct-Nov;25(7-8):404-408 [PMID: 30427209]
  14. J Postgrad Med. 2000 Apr-Jun;46(2):67-9 [PMID: 11013467]
  15. QJM. 2003 Apr;96(4):243-4 [PMID: 12651968]
  16. Nature. 2023 Mar;615(7954):790-793 [PMID: 36964255]
  17. PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738 [PMID: 19478950]
  18. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23(3):237-41 [PMID: 24266293]

MeSH Term

Humans
Plagiarism
Scientific Misconduct
Ethics, Research
Biomedical Research

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchethicsintegrityarticleinterrelationshipmisconductmodelprimaryformsplagiarismfabricationmainfactorsusescholarsethicalpurposeexplorefocusincludingfalsificationalsodetailsoccurrencepossiblewaysmitigatingamongmethodemployeddetailedexaminationdilemmasdelineatedliteraturewellleadingbreachesstrategiesmitigateteachingexperiencesauthorreflecteddevelopmentresultsrepresentedillustratingsignificantaspectidentificationnovelconcerningirrelevantforcedcitationsreferencesconclusionhighlightssubstantialpositiveeffectsadherenceacademicwell-beingResearch

Similar Articles

Cited By