A retrospective analysis of ibrutinib outcomes in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

Yong-Pyo Lee, Ye Ji Jung, Junhun Cho, Young Hyeh Ko, Won Seog Kim, Seok Jin Kim, Sang Eun Yoon
Author Information
  1. Yong-Pyo Lee: Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea.
  2. Ye Ji Jung: Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  3. Junhun Cho: Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  4. Young Hyeh Ko: Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  5. Won Seog Kim: Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  6. Seok Jin Kim: Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  7. Sang Eun Yoon: Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Background: While treatment strategies for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have evolved, patients often experience disease progression and require additional treatment therapies. Ibrutinib presents a promising option for relapsed or refractory MCL (RR-MCL). This study investigated real-world treatment outcomes of ibrutinib in patients with RR-MCL.
Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis investigated clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with RR-MCL, treated with ibrutinib.
Results: Forty-two patients were included, with 16 received rituximab and bendamustine, and 26 receiving anthracycline-based regimens as front-line treatment. During a median follow-up of 46.0 months, the response rate to ibrutinib was 69%, with 12 CRs and 8 partial responses. Disease progression (54.8%) and adverse events (11.9%) were the primary reasons for discontinuation. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were approximately 16.4 and 50.1 months, respectively. Patients older than 70 years (=0.044 and =0.006), those with splenomegaly (=0.022 and =0.006), and those with a high-risk simplified Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (sMIPI) (<0.001 and <0.001) exhibited siginificantly inferior PFS and OS. Notably, patients with a high-risk sMIPI relapsed earlier. Post-ibrutinib treatment yilded an OS of 12.2 months, while clinical trial participants demonstrated superior survival compared to those receiving chemotherapy alone.
Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of considering patient characteristics before administering ibrutinib as salvage therapy. Early relapse was associated with poor outcomes, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic strategies.

Keywords

References

  1. Hemasphere. 2022 Apr 13;6(5):e712 [PMID: 35441128]
  2. Cancer Med. 2019 Nov;8(16):6860-6870 [PMID: 31560165]
  3. Lancet. 2016 Feb 20;387(10020):770-8 [PMID: 26673811]
  4. Br J Haematol. 2021 Mar;192(6):1035-1038 [PMID: 32445482]
  5. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 8;369(6):507-16 [PMID: 23782157]
  6. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 20;41(24):3988-3997 [PMID: 37192437]
  7. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68 [PMID: 25113753]
  8. J Hematol Oncol. 2021 Mar 6;14(1):40 [PMID: 33676527]
  9. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 30;386(26):2495-2506 [PMID: 35767440]
  10. Oncotarget. 2018 Mar 27;9(38):25332-25341 [PMID: 29861875]
  11. Blood. 2015 Aug 6;126(6):739-45 [PMID: 26059948]
  12. Blood. 2017 Oct 26;130(17):1903-1910 [PMID: 28819011]
  13. Cancer Sci. 2016 Dec;107(12):1785-1790 [PMID: 27616553]
  14. Blood. 2016 May 19;127(20):2375-90 [PMID: 26980727]
  15. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021 Mar;41(3):275-278 [PMID: 33626235]
  16. Haematologica. 2019 May;104(5):e211-e214 [PMID: 30442728]
  17. Lancet Haematol. 2023 Feb;10(2):e142-e154 [PMID: 36725119]
  18. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;41(3):555-567 [PMID: 35658525]
  19. Hematol Oncol. 2017 Dec;35(4):528-535 [PMID: 28066928]
  20. Ann Hematol. 2023 Jan;102(1):107-115 [PMID: 36369497]
  21. Br J Haematol. 2021 Apr;193(2):290-298 [PMID: 33620106]
  22. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 2;382(14):1331-1342 [PMID: 32242358]
  23. Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan;50(1):222-238 [PMID: 28361523]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0treatmentpatientsibrutiniboutcomessurvival=0relapsedrefractoryRR-MCLmonthsOSstrategiesmantlecelllymphomaMCLprogressionIbrutinibstudyinvestigatedretrospectiveanalysisclinicalcharacteristics16receiving12PFS006high-riskLymphomasMIPI<0001Background:evolvedoftenexperiencediseaserequireadditionaltherapiespresentspromisingoptionreal-worldMethods:single-centertreatedResults:Forty-twoincludedreceivedrituximabbendamustine26anthracycline-basedregimensfront-linemedianfollow-up460responserate69%CRs8partialresponsesDisease548%adverseevents119%primaryreasonsdiscontinuationMedianprogression-freeoverallapproximately4501respectivelyPatientsolder70years044splenomegaly022simplifiedMantleCellInternationalPrognosticIndexexhibitedsiginificantlyinferiorNotablyearlierPost-ibrutinibyilded2trialparticipantsdemonstratedsuperiorcomparedchemotherapyaloneConclusion:underscoresimportanceconsideringpatientadministeringsalvagetherapyEarlyrelapseassociatedpoorhighlightingneednoveltherapeuticMantle-cellRelapsed

Similar Articles

Cited By