Relationship between work-family conflict and anxiety/depression among Chinese correctional officers: a moderated mediation model of burnout and resilience.

Ying Huang, Huijuan Guo, Siyuan Wang, Shaoling Zhong, Yuqiong He, Hui Chen, Jiansong Zhou, Xiaoping Wang
Author Information
  1. Ying Huang: Department of Psychiatry, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, and National Center for Mental Disorders, Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410011, China.
  2. Huijuan Guo: Department of Psychiatry, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, and National Center for Mental Disorders, Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410011, China.
  3. Siyuan Wang: Pingtang Compulsory Isolation Detoxification Institute in Hunan Province, Changsha, China.
  4. Shaoling Zhong: Department of Community Mental Health, the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  5. Yuqiong He: Department of Psychiatry, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, and National Center for Mental Disorders, Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410011, China.
  6. Hui Chen: Department of Psychiatry, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, and National Center for Mental Disorders, Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410011, China.
  7. Jiansong Zhou: Department of Psychiatry, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, and National Center for Mental Disorders, Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410011, China. zhoujs2003@csu.edu.cn.
  8. Xiaoping Wang: Department of Psychiatry, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, and National Center for Mental Disorders, Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan Province, 410011, China. xiaop6@csu.edu.cn.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Correctional officers tend to have high levels of work-family conflict (WFC). WFC has been found associated with various forms of psychological distress and to affect the overall well-being of correctional officers. Burnout and resilience may affect the relationship between WFC and psychological distress, however, this association still remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the mediating effect of burnout on the relationship between WFC and anxiety/depression and the moderating role of resilience, within the context of correctional officers.
METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in China from October 2021 to January 2022. WFC, burnout, resilience, anxiety, and depression were evaluated using the Work-Family Conflict Scale (WFCS), Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS), 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). Mediation and moderation models were then tested using the PROCESS macro in SPSS, with burnout being a mediator and resilience playing a moderating role in the relationship between WFC and anxiety/depression.
RESULTS: A total of 472 correctional officers were included. Burnout was found to mediate the relationship between WFC and anxiety (b = 0.14, 95%CI [0.10, 0.19]) and the relationship between WFC and depression (b = 0.23, 95%CI [0.18, 0.28]). Additionally, resilience played a moderating role in the direct effect of WFC on anxiety (b = - 0.02, p < 0.01) and the first half of the indirect effect of WFC on anxiety (b = - 0.007, p < 0.05). Furthermore, resilience was also found to moderate the first half of the indirect effect of WFC on depression (b = - 0.02, p < 0.01), but not the direct effect of WFC on depression (b = - 0.005, p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study may improve our understanding by elucidating the fundamental mechanisms of the connection between WFC and psychological distress among correctional officers. The results have significant implications for policymakers and individuals, as they suggest that diverse interventions may help promote the mental well-being of correctional officers.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 13;21(1):710 [PMID: 33849497]
  2. Front Public Health. 2019 Jul 09;7:189 [PMID: 31338358]
  3. Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:547-576 [PMID: 36103999]
  4. J Trauma Stress. 2007 Dec;20(6):1019-28 [PMID: 18157881]
  5. Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 13;10:891745 [PMID: 36176518]
  6. Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(3):353-62 [PMID: 25030412]
  7. Acta Inform Med. 2015 Feb;23(1):22-8 [PMID: 25870487]
  8. Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jun;68(12):2190-8 [PMID: 19403217]
  9. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010 Oct;64(5):499-504 [PMID: 20923429]
  10. J Neuroendocrinol. 2006 May;18(5):330-8 [PMID: 16629831]
  11. Saf Health Work. 2021 Sep;12(3):377-383 [PMID: 34527400]
  12. Saf Health Work. 2021 Jun;12(2):167-173 [PMID: 34178393]
  13. BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 26;22(1):2426 [PMID: 36567325]
  14. Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 03;11:1218825 [PMID: 37601183]
  15. J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Mar;24(2):250-9 [PMID: 20060680]
  16. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 09;11(12): [PMID: 37372814]
  17. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021 Jan;34(1):1-21 [PMID: 32856957]
  18. Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Mar 19;27(4):558-577 [PMID: 33679198]
  19. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2016 Sep;20(3):151-6 [PMID: 27332989]
  20. Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 18;13:1008854 [PMID: 36329738]
  21. Work. 2022;73(4):1117-1124 [PMID: 36057810]
  22. J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Nov;53(11):1294-301 [PMID: 22005395]
  23. BMC Psychol. 2022 Jun 2;10(1):142 [PMID: 35655324]
  24. Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 07;13:991239 [PMID: 36571060]
  25. Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 15;14:1084329 [PMID: 36874813]
  26. Psychol Health Med. 2020 Jan;25(1):1-9 [PMID: 30892922]
  27. J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jul 15;34(27):e188 [PMID: 31293112]
  28. Dev Psychopathol. 2012 May;24(2):335-44 [PMID: 22559117]
  29. J Adv Nurs. 2016 May;72(5):980-1000 [PMID: 26748456]
  30. Public Health. 2015 Sep;129(9):1172-8 [PMID: 26084818]
  31. BMC Psychol. 2020 Aug 6;8(1):79 [PMID: 32762769]
  32. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 15;11:493391 [PMID: 33658946]
  33. Asian J Criminol. 2021;16(1):91-107 [PMID: 33727986]
  34. Work. 2022;73(1):165-180 [PMID: 35871377]
  35. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Apr;5(2):278-308 [PMID: 10784291]
  36. J Occup Environ Med. 2022 Jun 1;64(6):504-509 [PMID: 35051959]
  37. J Appl Psychol. 2020 Aug;105(8):863-888 [PMID: 31750670]
  38. J Relig Health. 2021 Aug;60(4):2306-2321 [PMID: 33398655]
  39. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Nov 16;55(11): [PMID: 31744109]
  40. BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):1286 [PMID: 31615479]
  41. Soc Sci Res. 2022 May;104:102684 [PMID: 35400389]
  42. Psychol Rep. 2010 Feb;106(1):19-26 [PMID: 20402422]
  43. Eur J Public Health. 2017 Jun 1;27(3):465-471 [PMID: 28486653]
  44. Organ Dyn. 2022 Apr-Jun;51(2):100817 [PMID: 35719171]
  45. J Affect Disord. 2012 Dec 10;141(2-3):415-24 [PMID: 22445702]
  46. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Jun;28(2):743-750 [PMID: 33754945]
  47. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 12;14(2):e0211447 [PMID: 30753198]
  48. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 May 29;20(1):266 [PMID: 32471440]
  49. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9 [PMID: 19565683]
  50. Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Oct 27;29(6):832-853 [PMID: 36267600]
  51. BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):264 [PMID: 28302088]

Grants

  1. 2021ZD0200700/the 2030 Plan Technology and Innovation of China

MeSH Term

Depression
Family Conflict
Resilience, Psychological
Self Report
Correctional Facilities Personnel
Burnout, Professional
Humans
Anxiety
Psychological Tests
Cross-Sectional Studies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0WFCresilienceofficerscorrectionalrelationshipeffectdistressBurnoutburnoutanxietydepressionb = - 0conflictfoundpsychologicalmayanxiety/depressionmoderatingroleScalep < 0Correctionalwork-familyaffectwell-beingstudyusingResilienceb = 095%CI[00direct0201firsthalfindirect05amongBACKGROUND:tendhighlevelsassociatedvariousformsoverallhoweverassociationstillremainsunclearaimedexaminemediatingwithincontextMETHODS:cross-sectionalonlinesurveyconductedChinaOctober2021January2022evaluatedWork-FamilyConflictWFCSMaslachInventory-GeneralSurveyMBI-GS10-itemConnor-DavidsonCD-RISC-10DepressionAnxietyStressDASSMediationmoderationmodelstestedPROCESSmacroSPSSmediatorplayingRESULTS:total472includedmediate141019]231828]Additionallyplayed007Furthermorealsomoderate005p > 0CONCLUSION:findingspresentimproveunderstandingelucidatingfundamentalmechanismsconnectionresultssignificantimplicationspolicymakersindividualssuggestdiverseinterventionshelppromotementalRelationshipChineseofficers:moderatedmediationmodelofficerOccupationalhealthPsychologicalWork-family

Similar Articles

Cited By