Does paradoxical leadership influence employees' proactive work behavior? A study based on employees in Chinese state-owned enterprises.

Qin Qiang, Wu Xiaohong, Song Qianru
Author Information
  1. Qin Qiang: School of Journalism and Communication, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
  2. Wu Xiaohong: School of Journalism and Communication, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
  3. Song Qianru: Xi'an Technology and Business College, Xi'an, China.

Abstract

Paradoxical leadership has emerged as an increasingly important research topic in the context of Chinese state-owned enterprises, which are currently facing contradictions between maintaining stability and implementing changes, short-term profits and long-term sustainable development, and public nature and marketization. Based on social cognitive theory and social exchange theory, this study employed a questionnaire survey to explore the influence of paradoxical leadership on employees' proactive work behavior and the mediating role of superior-subordinate guanxi and self-efficacy. The study involved 540 employees working in Chinese state-owned enterprises. We conducted confirmatory factor analyses to test the validity of the measurement model and regression to evaluate the direct effects. Subsequently, we used bootstrapping to confirm mediation and serial mediation effects. The study found that (1) Paradoxical leadership can effectively enhance employees' proactive work behavior; (2) The superior-subordinate guanxi plays a mediating role between paradoxical leadership and employees' proactive work behavior, that is, paradoxical leadership enhances employees' proactive work behavior by improving the superior-subordinate guanxi; (3) Self-efficacy plays a mediating role between paradoxical leadership and employees' proactive work behaviors, that is, paradoxical leadership promotes employees' proactive work behavior by enhancing their self-efficacy; (4) The superior-subordinate guanxi and self-efficacy play a chain mediating effect between paradoxical leadership and employees' proactive work behavior, forming a chain of "Paradoxical leadership-Superior-subordinate Guanxi-Self-efficacy-Employees' proactive work behaviors." This study enriches the theoretical research on paradoxical leadership and provides suggestions for state-owned enterprises to enhance employees' proactive work behavior.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Dec 23;14:2181-2195 [PMID: 34992479]
  2. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):434-436 [PMID: 32203710]
  3. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 06;11:584645 [PMID: 33123063]
  4. Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 23;13:810227 [PMID: 35401384]
  5. J Occup Health Psychol. 1999 Jul;4(3):179-92 [PMID: 10431279]
  6. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215 [PMID: 847061]
  7. Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 29;9:422 [PMID: 29651266]
  8. Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 05;12:659072 [PMID: 34421715]
  9. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(8):1180-7 [PMID: 10838152]
  10. Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;11(12): [PMID: 34940117]
  11. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 02;13(8): [PMID: 37622785]
  12. Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 13;11:464774 [PMID: 33584392]
  13. Children (Basel). 2020 Mar 20;7(3): [PMID: 32245103]
  14. Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 25;9:2025 [PMID: 30410461]
  15. Br J Health Psychol. 2006 Sep;11(Pt 3):421-37 [PMID: 16870053]
  16. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Oct 02;12(10): [PMID: 36285946]
  17. Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 22;10:2960 [PMID: 32038369]
  18. Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 11;11:1758 [PMID: 32849041]
  19. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Feb 22;15:405-424 [PMID: 35228822]
  20. Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 06;14:1052732 [PMID: 37089731]
  21. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 30;17(15): [PMID: 32751465]
  22. Front Psychol. 2021 May 21;12:664638 [PMID: 34093360]
  23. Front Psychol. 2020 May 19;11:841 [PMID: 32508707]
  24. Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 11;12:597821 [PMID: 33643130]
  25. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Sep 10;15:2513-2527 [PMID: 36118652]
  26. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):6481 [PMID: 33742072]
  27. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 28;13:973103 [PMID: 36248556]
  28. J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):1084-102 [PMID: 17638467]
  29. Front Psychol. 2019 May 14;10:1029 [PMID: 31139112]
  30. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 28;18(7): [PMID: 33800591]
  31. Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 08;13:910707 [PMID: 35899007]
  32. Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 12;13:872147 [PMID: 35496244]
  33. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4): [PMID: 32059578]
  34. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 26;13:989386 [PMID: 36225687]
  35. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Jun;30(6):787-99 [PMID: 15155041]
  36. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 10;11:1661 [PMID: 33071834]
  37. Curr Psychol. 2022 Aug 16;:1-15 [PMID: 35990211]
  38. Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 14;11:2041 [PMID: 32922342]
  39. Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 11;11:590271 [PMID: 33362656]
  40. Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 02;9:1083 [PMID: 30013498]
  41. Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 21;11:590 [PMID: 32373007]
  42. Front Psychol. 2019 May 22;10:1206 [PMID: 31191401]
  43. Front Psychol. 2020 May 26;11:985 [PMID: 32528373]
  44. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jul 14;12(7): [PMID: 35877301]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0leadershipproactiveworkparadoxicalemployees'behaviorstudysuperior-subordinateguanxistate-ownedenterprisesmediatingself-efficacybehaviorsChineseroleParadoxicalresearchsocialtheoryinfluenceemployeeseffectsmediationenhanceplayschainemployees’emergedincreasinglyimportanttopiccontextcurrentlyfacingcontradictionsmaintainingstabilityimplementingchangesshort-termprofitslong-termsustainabledevelopmentpublicnaturemarketizationBasedcognitiveexchangeemployedquestionnairesurveyexploreinvolved540workingconductedconfirmatoryfactoranalysestestvaliditymeasurementmodelregressionevaluatedirectSubsequentlyusedbootstrappingconfirmserialfound1caneffectively2enhancesimproving3Self-efficacypromotesenhancing4playeffectforming"Paradoxicalleadership-Superior-subordinateGuanxi-Self-efficacy-Employees'"enrichestheoreticalprovidessuggestionsbehavior?based

Similar Articles

Cited By