How well does vaccine literacy predict intention to vaccinate and vaccination status? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Claudia Isonne, Jessica Iera, Antonio Sciurti, Erika Renzi, Maria Roberta De Blasiis, Carolina Marzuillo, Paolo Villari, Valentina Baccolini
Author Information
  1. Claudia Isonne: Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  2. Jessica Iera: Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  3. Antonio Sciurti: Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  4. Erika Renzi: Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  5. Maria Roberta De Blasiis: Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  6. Carolina Marzuillo: Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  7. Paolo Villari: Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  8. Valentina Baccolini: Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

This review quantified the association of vaccine literacy (VL) and vaccination intention and status. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Any study, published until December 2022, that investigated the associations of interest were eligible. For each outcome, articles were grouped according to the vaccine administrated and results were narratively synthesized. Inverse-variance random-effect models were used to compare standardized mean values in VL domain(s) between the two groups: individuals willing vs. unwilling to get vaccinated, and individuals vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. This review of 18 studies shows that VL strongly predicts the vaccination intention while its association with vaccination status is attenuated and barely significant, suggesting that other factors influence the actual vaccination uptake. However, given the scarce evidence available, the heterogeneity in the methods applied and some limitations of the studies included, further research should be conducted to confirm the role of VL in the vaccination decision-making process.

Keywords

References

  1. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Oct 29;10(11): [PMID: 36366341]
  2. Soc Sci Med. 2023 Mar;320:115671 [PMID: 36702028]
  3. Vaccine. 2022 Jul 30;40(32):4380-4393 [PMID: 35781171]
  4. J Health Commun. 2011 Mar;16(3):227-9 [PMID: 21391044]
  5. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Nov 9;11(1):136 [PMID: 36352471]
  6. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jan;90:188-196 [PMID: 31622674]
  7. Dev Rev. 2013 Dec;33(4):357-370 [PMID: 25580049]
  8. Lancet. 2020 Sep 26;396(10255):898-908 [PMID: 32919524]
  9. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 31;19(1):2176083 [PMID: 36794338]
  10. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Aug;31(4):857-867 [PMID: 35289065]
  11. Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):591-603 [PMID: 32007142]
  12. Curr Health Sci J. 2022 Apr-Jun;48(2):169-175 [PMID: 36320880]
  13. Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2022 Jun;3:100276 [PMID: 35637694]
  14. Curr Psychol. 2022 Jan 18;:1-16 [PMID: 35068910]
  15. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 May 11;10(5): [PMID: 35632514]
  16. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(5):698-701 [PMID: 33949640]
  17. J Am Coll Health. 2015;63(5):316-23 [PMID: 25836058]
  18. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Mar 4;13(3):701-702 [PMID: 27808587]
  19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 30;19(11): [PMID: 35682278]
  20. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100 [PMID: 19621070]
  21. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr;18(4):215-229 [PMID: 33473220]
  22. J Adv Nurs. 2022 Feb;78(2):446-457 [PMID: 34363635]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;19(20): [PMID: 36294178]
  24. Vaccine. 2010 Feb 17;28(7):1861-9 [PMID: 20006570]
  25. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 02;18(13): [PMID: 34281009]
  26. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Nov 29;9(12): [PMID: 34960151]
  27. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(6):2116900 [PMID: 36108286]
  28. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 07;10(9): [PMID: 36146566]
  29. Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):575-590 [PMID: 32007141]
  30. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;10(7): [PMID: 35891212]
  31. Ann Ig. 2020 May-Jun;32(3):205-222 [PMID: 32266359]
  32. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 May 4;17(5):1304-1312 [PMID: 33118868]
  33. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0172117 [PMID: 28207823]
  34. Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Feb;10(2):e186-e194 [PMID: 34951973]
  35. Int J Public Health. 2023 Mar 24;68:1605945 [PMID: 37035103]
  36. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Nov 24;9(12): [PMID: 34960137]
  37. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2018 Oct;17(10):881-888 [PMID: 30259755]
  38. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Nov 30;14:3309-3319 [PMID: 34876817]
  39. Int J Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;68:1605606 [PMID: 36866001]
  40. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;11(3): [PMID: 36766916]
  41. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Dec 02;9(12): [PMID: 34960170]
  42. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Aug 30;16:2365-2374 [PMID: 36065227]
  43. Vaccine. 2020 Mar 30;38(15):3079-3085 [PMID: 32147294]
  44. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(11):2552-2553 [PMID: 31013184]
  45. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]

MeSH Term

Humans
Intention
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Vaccination
Vaccines
Health Literacy

Chemicals

Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccinationreviewVLvaccineliteracyintentionassociationstatusindividualsvsvaccinatedstudiessystematicmeta-analysisquantifiedPubMedScopusWebSciencesearchedstudypublishedDecember2022investigatedassociationsinteresteligibleoutcomearticlesgroupedaccordingadministratedresultsnarrativelysynthesizedInverse-variancerandom-effectmodelsusedcomparestandardizedmeanvaluesdomainstwogroups:willingunwillinggetunvaccinated18showsstronglypredictsattenuatedbarelysignificantsuggestingfactorsinfluenceactualuptakeHowevergivenscarceevidenceavailableheterogeneitymethodsappliedlimitationsincludedresearchconductedconfirmroledecision-makingprocesswellpredictvaccinatestatus?Vaccinebehavior

Similar Articles

Cited By