Yue Yu: Department of Urology, The 1st Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Yujun Chen: Department of Urology, The 1st Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Xiaochen Zhou: Department of Urology, The 1st Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Xunwen Li: Department of Urology, The 1st Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Wei Liu: Department of Urology, The 1st Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Xiaofeng Cheng: Department of Urology, The 1st Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Luyao Chen: Department of Urology, The 1st Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Heng Yang: Department of Urology, The 1st Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Gongxian Wang: Department of Urology, The 1st Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China. wanggx1360791@163.com. ORCID
Haibo Xi: Department of Urology, The 1st Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, 17 YongWai Street Surgery Building, 17th Floor, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China. 13576032694@163.com.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficiency and safety of a novel flexible ureteral access sheath (f-UAS) and traditional ureteral access sheath (UAS) during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2022 and September 2022, a total of 152 consecutive cases with renal stones underwent RIRS with the f-UAS. Their outcomes were compared with those of another 152 consecutive cases undergoing RIRS with traditional UAS using a 1:1 scenario matched-pair analysis, with matching parameters including age and stone size. The f-UAS is a novel UAS with a 10-cm-long tube at the tip that can follow the bends of flexible ureteroscope (f-URS). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were found to be similar between the two groups. The f-UAS group demonstrated significantly higher SFR (76.3% vs. 7.2%; P < 0.001) at 1 day postoperatively and a higher clearance rate of stone volume (98.11% vs. 91.78%; P < 0.001). The f-UAS group also had lower total complications rate (9.9% vs. 22.4%; P = 0.003), lower incidence of fever (5.9% vs 11.9%; P = 0.001), shorter operative times (56.5 min vs. 59.9 min; P = 0.047), and lower usage rate of baskets (17.1% vs. 100%; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in SFR at 1 month postoperatively (P = 0.627) and in the length of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (P = 0.225). CONCLUSION: Compared to the traditional UAS during RIRS, the f-UAS showed several advantages, including higher SFR at 1 day postoperatively, shorter operative times, lower incidence of complications, and less use of basket.
