"Is a game really a reason for people to die?" Sentiment and thematic analysis of Twitter-based discourse on Indonesia soccer stampede.

Otobo I Ujah, Chukwuemeka E Ogbu, Russell S Kirby
Author Information
  1. Otobo I Ujah: Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 33612 Tampa Florida, USA.
  2. Chukwuemeka E Ogbu: Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 33612 Tampa Florida, USA.
  3. Russell S Kirby: Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 33612 Tampa Florida, USA.

Abstract

This study examined discourses related to an Indonesian soccer stadium stampede on 1st October 2022 using comments posted on Twitter. We conducted a lexicon-based sentiment analysis to identify the sentiments and emotions expressed in tweets and performed structural topic modeling to identify latent themes in the discourse. The majority of tweets (87.8%) expressed negative sentiments, while 8.2% and 4.0% of tweets expressed positive and neutral sentiments, respectively. The most common emotion expressed was fear (29.3%), followed by sadness and anger. Of the 19 themes identified, "Deaths and mortality" was the most prominent (15.1%), followed by "family impact". The negative stampede discourse was related to public concerns such as "vigil" and "calls for bans and suspension," while positive discourse focused more on the impact of the stampede. Public health institutions can leverage the volume and rapidity of social media to improve disaster prevention strategies.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 20;17(22): [PMID: 33233800]
  2. Sci Adv. 2016 Mar 11;2(3):e1500779 [PMID: 27034978]
  3. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0268409 [PMID: 35731785]
  4. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jul 21;:1-3 [PMID: 35861143]
  5. Am J Public Health. 2017 Jan;107(1):e1-e8 [PMID: 27854532]
  6. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3(4):191-5 [PMID: 20081414]
  7. Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 2;12(1):9163 [PMID: 35654806]
  8. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 20;17(4): [PMID: 32093217]
  9. Lancet. 2019 May 18;393(10185):2073-2084 [PMID: 31106753]
  10. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 18;10(2):e0117288 [PMID: 25692690]
  11. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022 Mar;31:100689 [PMID: 34933171]
  12. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jun;25(6):404-13 [PMID: 26464518]
  13. Transfus Med Rev. 2022 Jan;36(1):58-65 [PMID: 34810071]
  14. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Feb;34(1):82-88 [PMID: 30479244]
  15. J Addict Dis. 2021 Oct-Dec;39(4):489-503 [PMID: 33781174]
  16. Lancet. 2011 Jan 8;377(9760):106-7 [PMID: 20655584]
  17. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015;19(4):559-68 [PMID: 26270473]
  18. BMC Public Health. 2009 Sep 08;9:324 [PMID: 19735577]
  19. Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 May 04;4:1149441 [PMID: 37214560]
  20. Soc Sci Res. 2022 Nov;108:102784 [PMID: 36334929]
  21. PLoS One. 2021 Jun 23;16(6):e0253175 [PMID: 34161377]
  22. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3(4):217-23 [PMID: 20081418]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 22;18(19): [PMID: 34639274]
  24. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;42(2):131-138 [PMID: 32758315]
  25. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 28;12(7):e0181701 [PMID: 28753667]
  26. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014 Apr;29(2):167-75 [PMID: 24576664]
  27. Emerg Med J. 2003 Nov;20(6):556-9 [PMID: 14623853]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0stampedeexpresseddiscoursesentimentstweetsrelatedsocceranalysisidentifythemesnegativepositivefolloweddisasterstudyexamineddiscoursesIndonesianstadium1stOctober2022usingcommentspostedTwitterconductedlexicon-basedsentimentemotionsperformedstructuraltopicmodelinglatentmajority878%82%40%neutralrespectivelycommonemotionfear293%sadnessanger19identified"Deathsmortality"prominent151%"familyimpact"publicconcerns"vigil""callsbanssuspension"focusedimpactPublichealthinstitutionscanleveragevolumerapiditysocialmediaimprovepreventionstrategies"Isgamereallyreasonpeopledie?"SentimentthematicTwitter-basedIndonesiapreparednessmassgatheringsnaturallanguageprocessingtwitter

Similar Articles

Cited By