Estimating The Impact Of Out-Of-Pocket Cost Changes On Abandonment Of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis.

Lorraine T Dean, Amy Stewart Nunn, Hsien-Yen Chang, Shivani Bakre, William C Goedel, Rahel Dawit, Parya Saberi, Philip A Chan, Jalpa A Doshi
Author Information
  1. Lorraine T Dean: Lorraine T. Dean (lori.dean@jhu.edu), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
  2. Amy Stewart Nunn: Amy Stewart Nunn, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
  3. Hsien-Yen Chang: Hsien-Yen Chang, Johns Hopkins University.
  4. Shivani Bakre: Shivani Bakre, Johns Hopkins University.
  5. William C Goedel: William C. Goedel, Brown University.
  6. Rahel Dawit: Rahel Dawit, Johns Hopkins University.
  7. Parya Saberi: Parya Saberi, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  8. Philip A Chan: Philip A. Chan, Brown University.
  9. Jalpa A Doshi: Jalpa A. Doshi, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Abstract

Oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective for preventing HIV. Several different developments in the US either threaten to increase or promise to decrease PrEP out-of-pocket costs and access in the coming years. In a sample of 58,529 people with a new insurer-approved PrEP prescription, we estimated risk-adjusted percentages of patients who abandoned (did not fill) their initial prescription across six out-of-pocket cost categories. We then simulated the percentage of patients who would abandon PrEP under hypothetical changes to out-of-pocket costs, ranging from $0 to more than $500. PrEP abandonment rates of 5.5 percent at $0 rose to 42.6 percent at more than $500; even a small increase from $0 to $10 doubled the rate of abandonment. Conversely, abandonment rates that were 48.0 percent with out-of-pocket costs of more than $500 dropped to 7.3 percent when those costs were cut to $0. HIV diagnoses were two to three times higher among patients who abandoned PrEP prescriptions than among those who filled them. These results imply that recent legal challenges to the provision of PrEP with no cost sharing could substantially increase PrEP abandonment and HIV rates, upending progress on the HIV/AIDS epidemic.

References

  1. JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;2(11):1217-1225 [PMID: 28973087]
  2. JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2214-2230 [PMID: 31184746]
  3. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016 Jun 13;19(1):20903 [PMID: 27302837]
  4. J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(S1):32-39 [PMID: 35902088]
  5. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017 Aug;18(12):1167-1178 [PMID: 28699804]
  6. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 10;36(5):476-482 [PMID: 29261440]
  7. J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(S1):47-50 [PMID: 35902087]
  8. AIDS Behav. 2023 Aug;27(8):2606-2616 [PMID: 36670210]
  9. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 May;20(5):477-84 [PMID: 24761819]
  10. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 31;75(3):512-514 [PMID: 35018414]
  11. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 21;12(2):e0172354 [PMID: 28222118]
  12. JAMA. 2023 May 23;329(20):1733-1734 [PMID: 37036869]
  13. Public Health Rep. 2020 Mar/Apr;135(2):202-210 [PMID: 32027559]
  14. Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;28(12):833-840 [PMID: 30037634]
  15. Am J Public Health. 2020 Jan;110(1):61-64 [PMID: 31725314]
  16. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Apr 15;74(5):531-538 [PMID: 27861236]
  17. AIDS. 2021 Nov 15;35(14):2375-2381 [PMID: 34723852]
  18. Int J STD AIDS. 2022 Dec;33(14):1199-1205 [PMID: 36271632]
  19. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2019 Oct;33(10):434-439 [PMID: 31584857]

Grants

  1. P30 MH062246/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. T32 AI102623/NIAID NIH HHS
  3. R01 NR017573/NINR NIH HHS
  4. R21 NR018387/NINR NIH HHS
  5. P30 AI094189/NIAID NIH HHS
  6. R25 MH083620/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Health Expenditures
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Cost Sharing
Epidemics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PrEPHIVout-of-pocketcosts$0abandonmentincreasepatients$500ratesprescriptionabandonedcostamongOralpre-exposureprophylaxishighlyeffectivepreventingSeveraldifferentdevelopmentsUSeitherthreatenpromisedecreaseaccesscomingyearssample58529peoplenewinsurer-approvedestimatedrisk-adjustedpercentagesfillinitialacrosssixcategoriessimulatedpercentageabandonhypotheticalchangesranging55 percentrose426 percentevensmall$10doubledrateConversely480 percentdropped73 percentcutdiagnosestwothreetimeshigherprescriptionsfilledresultsimplyrecentlegalchallengesprovisionsharingsubstantiallyupendingprogressHIV/AIDSepidemicEstimatingImpactOut-Of-PocketCostChangesAbandonmentPre-ExposureProphylaxis

Similar Articles

Cited By