Musculoskeletal Radiology Education: A National Survey by the Italian College of Musculoskeletal Radiology.

Domenico Albano, Stefano Fusco, Marcello Zappia, Luca Maria Sconfienza, Andrea Giovagnoni, Alberto Aliprandi, Carmelo Messina
Author Information
  1. Domenico Albano: IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy. ORCID
  2. Stefano Fusco: Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.
  3. Marcello Zappia: Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy. ORCID
  4. Luca Maria Sconfienza: IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy. ORCID
  5. Andrea Giovagnoni: Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche", 60121 Ancona, Italy.
  6. Alberto Aliprandi: Radiology Unit, Zucchi Clinical Institutes Spa, 20900 Monza, Italy. ORCID
  7. Carmelo Messina: IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to understand how musculoskeletal training is structured in Italian residency programmes and the needs of young trainees.
METHODS: We sent out an online questionnaire (17 questions) to Italian Society of Radiology residents and board-certified radiologists aged up to 39 years.
RESULTS: A total of 1144 out of 4210 (27.2%) members participated in the survey; 64.7% were residents and 35.3% were board-certified radiologists. Just 26.6% of participants had dedicated rotations for musculoskeletal training during their residency, although this percentage substantially increased in replies from northern Italy. One-fourth of residents had a scheduled period of musculoskeletal ultrasound. Most participants (76.3%) had <20 h per year of musculoskeletal lessons. The majority considered their musculoskeletal education poor (57.7%) or average (21.9%). According to 84.8% of replies, no dedicated training period about interventional musculoskeletal procedures was scheduled. Further, just 12.8% of residents took active part in such interventions. Nearly all participants believed that the musculoskeletal programme during residency needs to be improved, particularly concerning practices in ultrasound (92.8%), MRI cases interpretation/reporting (78.9%), and practice in ultrasound-guided interventional procedures (64.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite some differences in the structure of musculoskeletal education provided by different regions, there is a shared demand for improvement in musculoskeletal training.

Keywords

References

  1. Osteoarthr Imaging. 2023 Jun;3(2): [PMID: 37799979]
  2. Insights Imaging. 2016 Feb;7(1):1-5 [PMID: 26753633]
  3. Clin Radiol. 2011 Feb;66(2):140-52 [PMID: 21216330]
  4. Acad Radiol. 2016 Jul;23(7):789-96 [PMID: 27067604]
  5. Clin Radiol. 2021 Sep;76(9):650-658 [PMID: 33994178]
  6. Skeletal Radiol. 2020 Jul;49(7):1149-1153 [PMID: 32123954]
  7. Skeletal Radiol. 2016 Apr;45(4):475-82 [PMID: 26748645]
  8. Eur Radiol. 2022 Jan;32(1):551-560 [PMID: 34146140]
  9. Acad Radiol. 2019 May;26(5):701-706 [PMID: 30243892]
  10. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):223 [PMID: 31226989]
  11. Radiol Clin North Am. 2018 Nov;56(6):1035-1046 [PMID: 30322485]
  12. Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):2220-2230 [PMID: 31844963]
  13. Radiol Bras. 2020 Jul-Aug;53(4):236-240 [PMID: 32904829]
  14. Br J Radiol. 2021 May 1;94(1121):20210198 [PMID: 33793317]
  15. Eur J Radiol. 2022 Oct;155:110330 [PMID: 35581109]
  16. Skeletal Radiol. 2020 Jul;49(Suppl 1):1-33 [PMID: 32488336]
  17. Eur Radiol. 2022 Mar;32(3):1456-1464 [PMID: 34581843]
  18. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Apr;210(4):834-841 [PMID: 29489411]
  19. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2018 Nov;22(5):522-527 [PMID: 30399616]
  20. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 22;8:779975 [PMID: 34881271]
  21. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jun;206(6):1217-21 [PMID: 27058462]
  22. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 May-Jun;50(3):379-383 [PMID: 32209299]
  23. Eur Radiol. 2022 Feb;32(2):1384-1394 [PMID: 34432122]
  24. Skeletal Radiol. 2019 Jan;48(1):143-147 [PMID: 30003278]
  25. Skeletal Radiol. 2023 May;52(5):911-921 [PMID: 36042035]
  26. Insights Imaging. 2021 Sep 9;12(1):126 [PMID: 34499287]
  27. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Aug;30(4):736-750 [PMID: 27931965]
  28. Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1498-1506 [PMID: 31712960]
  29. Radiol Med. 2017 Apr;122(4):288-293 [PMID: 28070842]
  30. Insights Imaging. 2022 Jan 28;13(1):15 [PMID: 35089474]
  31. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2020 Jun;24(3):290-309 [PMID: 32987427]
  32. Radiol Med. 2019 Jun;124(6):522-538 [PMID: 30690662]
  33. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jun;17(6):812-818 [PMID: 31899181]
  34. Insights Imaging. 2020 Oct 30;11(1):114 [PMID: 33123830]
  35. Radiol Clin North Am. 1998 May;36(3):597-604 [PMID: 9597077]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0musculoskeletaltrainingresidentsItalianresidencyRadiology3%participantsultrasoundeducation8%interventionalneedsboard-certifiedradiologists647%dedicatedrepliesscheduledperiod9%proceduresMRIMusculoskeletalradiologyBACKGROUND:aimunderstandstructuredprogrammesyoungtraineesMETHODS:sentonlinequestionnaire17questionsSocietyaged39yearsRESULTS:total11444210272%membersparticipatedsurvey35Just266%rotationsalthoughpercentagesubstantiallyincreasednorthernItalyOne-fourth76<20hperyearlessonsmajorityconsideredpoor57average21According84just12tookactivepartinterventionsNearlybelievedprogrammeimprovedparticularlyconcerningpractices92casesinterpretation/reporting78practiceultrasound-guidedCONCLUSIONS:DespitedifferencesstructureprovideddifferentregionsshareddemandimprovementEducation:NationalSurveyCollege

Similar Articles

Cited By