AI-Assisted Fatigue and Stamina Control for Performance Sports on IMU-Generated Multivariate Times Series Datasets.

Attila Biró, Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas, László Szilágyi
Author Information
  1. Attila Biró: Department of Physiotherapy, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain. ORCID
  2. Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas: Department of Physiotherapy, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain. ORCID
  3. László Szilágyi: Physiological Controls Research Center, Óbuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal sports performance requires a balance between intensive training and adequate rest. IMUs provide objective, quantifiable data to analyze performance dynamics, despite the challenges in quantifying athlete training loads. The ability of AI to analyze complex datasets brings innovation to the monitoring and optimization of athlete training cycles. Traditional techniques rely on subjective assessments to prevent overtraining, which can lead to injury and underperformance. IMUs provide objective, quantitative data on athletes' physical status during action. AI and machine learning can turn these data into useful insights, enabling data-driven athlete performance management. With IMU-generated multivariate time series data, this paper uses AI to construct a robust model for predicting fatigue and stamina.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: IMUs linked to 19 athletes recorded triaxial acceleration, angular velocity, and magnetic orientation throughout repeated sessions. Standardized training included steady-pace runs and fatigue-inducing techniques. The raw time series data were used to train a supervised ML model based on frequency and time-domain characteristics. The performances of Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Machines, and LSTM networks were compared. A feedback loop adjusted the model in real time based on prediction error and bias estimation.
RESULTS: The AI model demonstrated high predictive accuracy for fatigue, showing significant correlations between predicted fatigue levels and observed declines in performance. Stamina predictions enabled individualized training adjustments that were in sync with athletes' physiological thresholds. Bias correction mechanisms proved effective in minimizing systematic prediction errors. Moreover, real-time adaptations of the model led to enhanced training periodization strategies, reducing the risk of overtraining and improving overall athletic performance.
CONCLUSIONS: In sports performance analytics, the AI-assisted model using IMU multivariate time series data is effective. Training can be tailored and constantly altered because the model accurately predicts fatigue and stamina. AI models can effectively forecast the beginning of weariness before any physical symptoms appear. This allows for timely interventions to prevent overtraining and potential accidents. The model shows an exceptional ability to customize training programs according to the physiological reactions of each athlete and enhance the overall training effectiveness. In addition, the study demonstrated the model's efficacy in real-time monitoring performance, improving the decision-making abilities of both coaches and athletes. The approach enables ongoing and thorough data analysis, supporting strategic planning for training and competition, resulting in optimized performance outcomes. These findings highlight the revolutionary capability of AI in sports science, offering a future where data-driven methods greatly enhance athlete training and performance management.

Keywords

References

  1. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 26;22(7): [PMID: 35408167]
  2. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;23(7): [PMID: 37050655]
  3. Sports (Basel). 2022 Feb 28;10(3): [PMID: 35324642]
  4. Front Sports Act Living. 2022 May 09;4:823488 [PMID: 35615347]
  5. Sports Med. 2021 Sep;51(9):1967-1982 [PMID: 33886099]
  6. Sensors (Basel). 2019 Sep 27;19(19): [PMID: 31569776]
  7. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 24;2022:5611829 [PMID: 36059406]
  8. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Oct 5;17(2):216-225 [PMID: 34611057]
  9. Comput Biol Med. 2021 Oct;137:104779 [PMID: 34454166]
  10. Entropy (Basel). 2020 Jan 10;22(1): [PMID: 33285864]
  11. J Pers Med. 2022 May 05;12(5): [PMID: 35629171]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23): [PMID: 33255212]
  13. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr 29;13(1):46 [PMID: 33926527]
  14. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;21(1): [PMID: 33374324]
  15. Artif Intell Rev. 2023;56(6):5261-5315 [PMID: 36320613]
  16. Sports Med Open. 2021 Apr 1;7(1):22 [PMID: 33792790]
  17. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 May 11;8(2):e001251 [PMID: 35592544]
  18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 14;19(16): [PMID: 36011667]
  19. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 24;23(1): [PMID: 36616781]
  20. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Jul;50:159-165 [PMID: 34029988]
  21. Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 12;22(10): [PMID: 35632109]
  22. J Athl Train. 2021 Sep 1;56(9):973-979 [PMID: 33237988]
  23. Sports Med Open. 2021 Mar 16;7(1):20 [PMID: 33725208]
  24. Front Physiol. 2022 Feb 11;13:814172 [PMID: 35222081]
  25. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 22;21(4): [PMID: 33671497]
  26. Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 16;13(1):4400 [PMID: 36927733]
  27. Phys Ther Rev. 2010 Dec;15(6):462-473 [PMID: 23565045]
  28. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Jan 28;4(1):e83-e91 [PMID: 35141540]
  29. Biosensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 27;10(9): [PMID: 32867277]
  30. Am J Sports Med. 2021 Mar;49(4):918-927 [PMID: 33617291]
  31. Sports Med. 2018 May;48(5):1221-1246 [PMID: 29476427]
  32. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Apr;23(4):305-317 [PMID: 30795896]
  33. J Biomech. 2019 Sep 20;94:1-4 [PMID: 31427095]
  34. Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 11;14:1143618 [PMID: 37113120]
  35. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 15;20(24): [PMID: 33333839]

MeSH Term

Humans
Time Factors
Athletic Performance
Acceleration
Fatigue
Machine Learning

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trainingperformancemodeldataAIathletefatiguecantimesportsIMUsovertraininglearningseriesstaminaprovideobjectiveanalyzeabilitymonitoringtechniquespreventathletes'physicalmachinedata-drivenmanagementmultivariateathletesbasedLSTMpredictiondemonstratedStaminaphysiologicaleffectivereal-timeimprovingoverallIMUenhanceBACKGROUND:OptimalrequiresbalanceintensiveadequaterestquantifiabledynamicsdespitechallengesquantifyingloadscomplexdatasetsbringsinnovationoptimizationcyclesTraditionalrelysubjectiveassessmentsleadinjuryunderperformancequantitativestatusactionturnusefulinsightsenablingIMU-generatedpaperusesconstructrobustpredictingMATERIALSANDMETHODS:linked19recordedtriaxialaccelerationangularvelocitymagneticorientationthroughoutrepeatedsessionsStandardizedincludedsteady-pacerunsfatigue-inducingrawusedtrainsupervisedMLfrequencytime-domaincharacteristicsperformancesRandomForestGradientBoostingMachinesnetworkscomparedfeedbackloopadjustedrealerrorbiasestimationRESULTS:highpredictiveaccuracyshowingsignificantcorrelationspredictedlevelsobserveddeclinespredictionsenabledindividualizedadjustmentssyncthresholdsBiascorrectionmechanismsprovedminimizingsystematicerrorsMoreoveradaptationsledenhancedperiodizationstrategiesreducingriskathleticCONCLUSIONS:analyticsAI-assistedusingTrainingtailoredconstantlyalteredaccuratelypredictsmodelseffectivelyforecastbeginningwearinesssymptomsappearallowstimelyinterventionspotentialaccidentsshowsexceptionalcustomizeprogramsaccordingreactionseffectivenessadditionstudymodel'sefficacydecision-makingabilitiescoachesapproachenablesongoingthoroughanalysissupportingstrategicplanningcompetitionresultingoptimizedoutcomesfindingshighlightrevolutionarycapabilityscienceofferingfuturemethodsgreatlyAI-AssistedFatigueControlPerformanceSportsIMU-GeneratedMultivariateTimesSeriesDatasetsassessmentdeepcontrol

Similar Articles

Cited By