Instructing somebody else to act: motor co-representations in the instructor.

Mathias Van der Biest, Rebecca Pedinoff, Frederick Verbruggen, Marcel Brass, Anna K Kuhlen
Author Information
  1. Mathias Van der Biest: Department of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. ORCID
  2. Rebecca Pedinoff: Berlin School of Mind and Brain/ Department of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  3. Frederick Verbruggen: Department of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. ORCID
  4. Marcel Brass: Berlin School of Mind and Brain/ Department of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  5. Anna K Kuhlen: Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. ORCID

Abstract

Instructions enable humans to perform novel tasks quickly. This is achieved by creating and activating the instruction representation for upcoming tasks, which can then modulate ongoing task behaviour in an almost 'reflexive' manner, an effect called instruction-based reflexivity. While most research has focused on understanding how verbal instructions are represented within the 'instructed' (i.e. the person receiving instructions), here we focus on how the instructor's (i.e. the person giving instructions) behaviour is affected through instructing. In a series of three experiments and one pooled analysis, we extended the classical instruction-based reflexivity paradigm to a novel social variant in which the instructions are given by an instructor (rather than visual computer-generated instructions). We found an instruction-based reflexivity effect for the instructor, that is, the instructor's task performance was better on congruent compared to incongruent trials (i.e. Experiments 1 and 2, pooled analysis). This suggests that the instructor represents the instructions of the instructed in an action-oriented format. However, this did not depend on the specific task of the instructed (i.e. Experiment 1), nor is it exclusively social (i.e. Experiment 3).

Keywords

Associated Data

figshare | 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6978786

References

  1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):813-826 [PMID: 33037582]
  2. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Nov;151(11):2812-2832 [PMID: 35511566]
  3. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt A):16-28 [PMID: 29173507]
  4. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012 Jul;40(5):669-81 [PMID: 22187093]
  5. Dev Sci. 2008 Mar;11(2):223-36 [PMID: 18333979]
  6. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Dec;31(6):1234-46 [PMID: 16366786]
  7. Science. 2002 Feb 22;295(5559):1532-6 [PMID: 11859197]
  8. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):768-86 [PMID: 25329082]
  9. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):481-7 [PMID: 23413011]
  10. R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jan 10;11(1):230839 [PMID: 38204793]
  11. Psychophysiology. 2020 Sep;57(9):e13586 [PMID: 32412145]
  12. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Spring;10(2):486-9 [PMID: 23843808]
  13. Ann Clin Biochem. 2022 May;59(3):162-165 [PMID: 34666549]
  14. Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203 [PMID: 30734206]
  15. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jun;207:103085 [PMID: 32416515]
  16. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 Mar;30(3):602-614 [PMID: 31811733]
  17. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jul;25(7):1049-61 [PMID: 23489144]
  18. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun;15(2):395-415 [PMID: 25673005]
  19. Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 04;7:2039 [PMID: 28101077]
  20. Brain Res. 2011 Mar 10;1378:91-104 [PMID: 21215729]
  21. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Dec;14(4):1300-9 [PMID: 24841079]
  22. J Neurosci. 2009 Feb 11;29(6):1766-72 [PMID: 19211883]
  23. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):1026-34 [PMID: 23035698]
  24. Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):643-50 [PMID: 20805586]
  25. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Oct;26(10):2275-86 [PMID: 24702448]
  26. Neuroimage. 2021 Feb 1;226:117608 [PMID: 33271270]
  27. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013 Mar;13(1):1-22 [PMID: 23065743]
  28. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:4896-9 [PMID: 25571089]
  29. J Cogn. 2019 Jul 19;2(1):16 [PMID: 31517234]
  30. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jun 01;6:148 [PMID: 22675293]
  31. Percept Psychophys. 2005 May;67(4):659-66 [PMID: 16134459]
  32. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Apr;71(4):989-1008 [PMID: 28303739]
  33. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Mar;6(2):174-215 [PMID: 7373248]
  34. Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 14;12:675558 [PMID: 34194371]
  35. Adv Physiol Educ. 2018 Jun 1;42(2):343-347 [PMID: 29761718]
  36. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2011 Oct;2(4):315-6 [PMID: 22025871]
  37. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jan;151(1):213-223 [PMID: 34060886]
  38. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Nov;32(11):1811-24 [PMID: 21140434]
  39. Behav Res Methods. 2006 May;38(2):280-6 [PMID: 16956104]
  40. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2008 Sep;90(2):475-8 [PMID: 18620069]
  41. Psychol Res. 2009 Jul;73(4):587-601 [PMID: 19360437]
  42. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1325-35 [PMID: 22545614]
  43. Cereb Cortex. 2017 Mar 1;27(3):1891-1905 [PMID: 26908634]
  44. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):58-76 [PMID: 28685272]
  45. Cognition. 2020 Aug;201:104295 [PMID: 32334150]
  46. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Aug;60(8):1140-54 [PMID: 17654396]
  47. Crit Care. 2005 Feb;9(1):112-8 [PMID: 15693993]
  48. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Apr;215:103285 [PMID: 33676068]
  49. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 10;108(19):7716-20 [PMID: 21518867]
  50. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Jun;158:43-50 [PMID: 25939136]
  51. Psychol Res. 2014 Nov;78(6):803-20 [PMID: 24213250]
  52. Cognition. 2003 Jul;88(3):B11-21 [PMID: 12804818]
  53. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt A):1-3 [PMID: 28457808]
  54. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Apr;34(4):762-74 [PMID: 22113962]
  55. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Feb;43(2):328-347 [PMID: 27831720]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0instructionsieinstruction-basedreflexivityinstructortasksocialnoveltasksbehavioureffectpersoninstructor'sinstructingpooledanalysis1instructedExperimentmotorInstructionsenablehumansperformquicklyachievedcreatingactivatinginstructionrepresentationupcomingcanmodulateongoingalmost'reflexive'mannercalledresearchfocusedunderstandingverbalrepresentedwithin'instructed'receivingfocusgivingaffectedseriesthreeexperimentsoneextendedclassicalparadigmvariantgivenrathervisualcomputer-generatedfoundperformancebettercongruentcomparedincongruenttrialsExperiments2suggestsrepresentsaction-orientedformatHoweverdependspecificexclusively3Instructingsomebodyelseact:co-representationsrepresentationscognition

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)