Conflicting and complementary notions of responsibility in caregiver's and health care workers' vaccination narratives in the Philippines.
Ma Leslie Ulmido, Mark Donald C Reñosa, Jonas Wachinger, Vivienne Endoma, Jhoys Landicho-Guevarra, Jeniffer Landicho, Thea Andrea Bravo, Mila Aligato, Shannon A McMahon
Author Information
Ma Leslie Ulmido: Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Mark Donald C Reñosa: Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Jonas Wachinger: Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Vivienne Endoma: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine - Department of Health, Muntinlupa City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Jhoys Landicho-Guevarra: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine - Department of Health, Muntinlupa City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Jeniffer Landicho: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine - Department of Health, Muntinlupa City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Thea Andrea Bravo: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine - Department of Health, Muntinlupa City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Mila Aligato: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine - Department of Health, Muntinlupa City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Shannon A McMahon: Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Background: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) continues to pose a public health threat globally. Understanding the attitudes and perceptions about vaccination of key stakeholders in vaccine decision-making (such as health care workers (HCWs) and caregivers) about vaccination can pave the way toward novel approaches to bolster vaccine confidence. In this study, we explored the role of notions of responsibilities among HCWs and caregivers in shaping vaccination interactions and decision-making in the Philippines. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with 44 vaccine-hesitant caregivers, seven HCWs, and 20 community health workers (barangay health workers) in the Philippines between August 2020 and March 2021. The interviews and focus groups were conducted online, transcribed verbatim, and analysed through the reflexive thematic analysis approach. Results: Caregivers highlighted responsibility in terms of being a good caregiver, managing risk to one's own child, and seeking and validating information. Meanwhile, HCWs highlighted responsibility as: being a good HCW, managing risk to children and to the community, and providing and transforming information. Our findings suggest that responsibility manifests differently in HCWs' and caregivers' narratives, and that these notions can be both conflicting and complementary, shaping the interaction between stakeholders and, ultimately, their vaccine decision-making. We also found that fostering a good relationship between HCWs and caregivers through communication techniques such as motivational interviewing could help bridge the gap created by mistrust in vaccinations. HCWs sharing their own experiences as parents who vaccinate their own children also resonate with caregivers. Conclusions: Notions of responsibility can underpin collaborative and divisive interactions between HCWs and caregivers. Public health messaging and interventions related to vaccination must consider strategies that align with these notions to address VH.
References
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 9;11(6):e046814
[PMID: 34108166]
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2019 Mar 28;8(1):1-8
[PMID: 33513237]
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;35(2):420-426
[PMID: 35379731]
