Acute effects of resistance-type and cycling-type high-intensity interval training on arterial stiffness, cardiac autonomic modulation and cardiac biomarkers.

Tianjiao Wang, Jun Mao, Shumin Bo, Li Zhang, Qing Li
Author Information
  1. Tianjiao Wang: College of Kinesiology and Health, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
  2. Jun Mao: College of Kinesiology and Health, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
  3. Shumin Bo: College of Kinesiology and Health, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China. boshumin@163.com.
  4. Li Zhang: College of Kinesiology and Health, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
  5. Qing Li: College of Kinesiology and Health, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been shown to enhance cardiovascular health. However, there is a lack of research investigating the specific cardiovascular effects of different HIIT training modes. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the acute effects of cycling-type high intensity interval training (C-HIIT) and resistance-type high intensity interval training (R-HIIT) on arterial stiffness, cardiac autonomic modulation, and cardiac biomarkers in healthy young men.
METHODS: This is a cross-over randomized trial. Eleven healthy active young men took part in both C-HIIT and R-HIIT. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), heart rate variability (HRV), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were measured before, immediately and 30 min after the exercise in C-HIIT and R-HIIT. Meanwhile, blood samples for cardiac troponin-T (cTnT) and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were assessed using ELISA before, 5min and 35min after exercise.
RESULTS: There was a significant time × group interaction effect (P = 0.019, η = 0.182) and time main effect for ⊿CAVI (P < 0.001, η = 0.729), and R-HIIT resulted in a more significant reduction in ⊿CAVI compared to C-HIIT (- 0.60 ± 0.30, P = 0.043, d = 0.924) immediately after exercise. There was a significant time main effect was observed for SBP (P = 0.001, η = 0.304). A significant time main effect for lnHF (P < 0.001, η = 0.782), lnRMSSD (P < 0.001, η = 0.693), and LF/HF (P = 0.001, η = 0.302) of HRV was observed. A significant time main effect was observed for cTnT (P = 0.023, η = 0.193) and NT-proBNP (P = 0.001, η = 0.334) of cardiac biomarkers.
CONCLUSION: R-HIIT and C-HIIT elicited similar acute responses in cardiac autonomic modulation and cardiac biomarkers. However, R-HIIT was more effective in reducing arterial stiffness in healthy young men. Furthermore, the increase in cardiac biomarkers induced by both C-HIIT and R-HIIT was reversible.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered on 22 February 2022 at www.chictr.org.cn with identification number ChiCTR2200056897.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Physiol. 2022 Jun 28;13:900661 [PMID: 35837018]
  2. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 10;9:864173 [PMID: 35620510]
  3. J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 21;12(6): [PMID: 36983423]
  4. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):169-76 [PMID: 20620736]
  5. Am J Physiol. 1999 Aug;277(2):E390-4 [PMID: 10444436]
  6. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 May;30(5):849-857 [PMID: 31977120]
  7. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Mar;105(5):787-95 [PMID: 19125283]
  8. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2016;23(2):155-68 [PMID: 26607350]
  9. J Sci Med Sport. 2019 Apr;22(4):462-466 [PMID: 30297216]
  10. Physiol Rep. 2016 Dec;4(24): [PMID: 28003565]
  11. Clin Cardiol. 2020 Aug;43(8):872-881 [PMID: 31975465]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 17;15(7): [PMID: 30018242]
  13. Int J Sports Med. 2011 May;32(5):327-31 [PMID: 21547864]
  14. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Jan;115(1):177-85 [PMID: 25260247]
  15. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2004 Jul-Aug;24(4):269-73 [PMID: 15286535]
  16. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jul;41(7):706-13 [PMID: 27337599]
  17. J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 14;10(2): [PMID: 33466830]
  18. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Oct;27(10):1061-1069 [PMID: 27430157]
  19. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114(7):1385-92 [PMID: 24643430]
  20. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Apr;21(2):244-9 [PMID: 19919634]
  21. Z Kardiol. 2004 Jul;93(7):540-5 [PMID: 15243765]
  22. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Feb;122(2):459-474 [PMID: 34799752]
  23. Br J Sports Med. 2008 May;42(5):383-5 [PMID: 18184752]
  24. Eur J Sport Sci. 2019 Jun;19(5):653-660 [PMID: 30496024]
  25. Front Physiol. 2022 Sep 09;13:986920 [PMID: 36160857]
  26. Sports Med. 2013 May;43(5):313-38 [PMID: 23539308]
  27. Exp Physiol. 2018 Mar 1;103(3):370-380 [PMID: 29247498]
  28. Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 2;12(1):1749 [PMID: 35110636]
  29. Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Feb 01;13(2):395-409 [PMID: 32148625]
  30. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 24;17(8): [PMID: 32344773]
  31. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Nov;36(11):1900-6 [PMID: 15514505]
  32. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 15;102(2):218-22 [PMID: 18602525]
  33. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Dec;37(6):1124-31 [PMID: 22994393]
  34. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jan;32(1):223-229 [PMID: 28796128]
  35. Sports Med. 2013 Dec;43(12):1259-77 [PMID: 23912805]
  36. Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;13:1095328 [PMID: 36743598]
  37. Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 10;13:850768 [PMID: 35360225]
  38. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Apr;112(4):1261-8 [PMID: 21833487]
  39. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Oct;115(10):2149-57 [PMID: 26032570]
  40. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2021 Sep;61(9):1301-1308 [PMID: 34610731]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cardiacη = 0trainingR-HIITintervalC-HIITP = 0001biomarkerssignificanttimeeffectmaineffectsarterialstiffnessautonomicmodulationhealthyyoungmenexerciseP < 0observedhigh-intensityHIITcardiovascularHoweverstudyacutecycling-typehighintensityresistance-typeHRVbloodSBPimmediatelycTnTNT-proBNP⊿CAVIBACKGROUND:High-intensityshownenhancehealthlackresearchinvestigatingspecificdifferentmodesThereforeaimedcompareMETHODS:cross-overrandomizedtrialElevenactivetookpartCardio-anklevascularindexCAVIheartratevariabilitysystolicpressuremeasured30 minMeanwhilesamplestroponin-Tamino-terminalpro-B-typenatriureticpeptideassessedusingELISA5min35minRESULTS:×groupinteraction019182729resultedreductioncompared- 060 ± 030043d = 0924304lnHF782lnRMSSD693LF/HF302023193334CONCLUSION:elicitedsimilarresponseseffectivereducingFurthermoreincreaseinducedreversibleTRIALREGISTRATION:prospectivelyregistered22February2022wwwchictrorgcnidentificationnumberChiCTR2200056897AcuteCardiovascularCycling-typeResistance-type

Similar Articles

Cited By