Perceptions of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in the T1D Exchange Diabetes Registry: Satisfaction, Concerns, and Areas for Future Improvement.

Elizabeth Holt, Huyen Nguyen, Jeoffrey Bispham, Jingwen Liu, Katherine Chapman, Mike Grady
Author Information
  1. Elizabeth Holt: LifeScan, Malvern, PA.
  2. Huyen Nguyen: T1D Exchange, Boston, MA.
  3. Jeoffrey Bispham: T1D Exchange, Boston, MA.
  4. Jingwen Liu: T1D Exchange, Boston, MA.
  5. Katherine Chapman: T1D Exchange, Boston, MA.
  6. Mike Grady: LifeScan Scotland, Inverness, U.K. ORCID

Abstract

Manufacturers continue to improve performance and usability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems. As CGM becomes a standard of care, especially for people on insulin therapy, it is important to routinely gauge how satisfied people with diabetes are with this technology. This article describes survey feedback from a large cohort of people with diabetes using older and current CGM systems and highlights areas of current satisfaction, concern, and future system improvement.

Associated Data

figshare | 10.2337/figshare.23866626

References

  1. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;22(9): [PMID: 35590791]
  2. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Mar;14(2):493-495 [PMID: 31910661]
  3. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Nov;17(11):787-94 [PMID: 26171659]
  4. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Jul;15(4):786-791 [PMID: 32389062]
  5. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Jul;17(4):962-967 [PMID: 35466707]
  6. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Sep;23(S3):S5-S11 [PMID: 34546084]
  7. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Sep;11(5):936-941 [PMID: 28332406]
  8. Metabolism. 2001 Feb;50(2):171-7 [PMID: 11229425]
  9. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;18(1):59-65 [PMID: 35549522]
  10. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Feb;21(2):66-72 [PMID: 30657336]
  11. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Jan;13(1):82-95 [PMID: 30073864]
  12. Contact Dermatitis. 2019 Nov;81(5):354-367 [PMID: 31166016]
  13. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2219-2228 [PMID: 34107181]
  14. Nutrients. 2018 Jan 15;10(1): [PMID: 29342932]
  15. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Jun;23(6):443-451 [PMID: 33314990]
  16. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Apr;186:109825 [PMID: 35278520]
  17. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021 Jun 1;181:113054 [PMID: 33775474]
  18. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):484-492 [PMID: 28745093]
  19. Diabetes Care. 2017 Feb;40(2):181-187 [PMID: 27899489]
  20. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Nov 3;:19322968221134639 [PMID: 36329636]
  21. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):801-7 [PMID: 25852074]
  22. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):517-518 [PMID: 32865043]
  23. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;178:108989 [PMID: 34331978]
  24. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Nov;15(6):1377-1381 [PMID: 32757778]
  25. Endocr Pract. 2015 Jun;21(6):613-20 [PMID: 25716635]
  26. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;21(2): [PMID: 33445438]
  27. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 May;16(3):649-658 [PMID: 33615834]
  28. Contact Dermatitis. 2019 Jul;81(1):27-31 [PMID: 30773644]
  29. Diabetes Ther. 2022 Jun;13(6):1175-1185 [PMID: 35476279]
  30. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Jan;22(1):53-56 [PMID: 31464516]
  31. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 May;12(3):725-726 [PMID: 29076353]
  32. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Mar;16(2):271-274 [PMID: 34911382]
  33. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Nov;14(6):1035-1064 [PMID: 32985262]
  34. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Jun;24(6):373-380 [PMID: 35157505]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CGMpeoplesystemsdiabetescurrentManufacturerscontinueimproveperformanceusabilitycontinuousglucosemonitoringbecomesstandardcareespeciallyinsulintherapyimportantroutinelygaugesatisfiedtechnologyarticledescribessurveyfeedbacklargecohortusingolderhighlightsareassatisfactionconcernfuturesystemimprovementPerceptionsContinuousGlucoseMonitoringSystemsT1DExchangeDiabetesRegistry:SatisfactionConcernsAreasFutureImprovement

Similar Articles

Cited By