Influence of extract on improving microcirculation and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Peng Xi, Yuan Xie, Feifei Huang, Yang Liu, Jiahong Xu
Author Information
  1. Peng Xi: Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  2. Yuan Xie: Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  3. Feifei Huang: Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  4. Yang Liu: Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  5. Jiahong Xu: Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Abstract

Background: Microcirculatory dysfunction is an independent risk factor for a poor prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). is a well-known Chinese traditional herb described with the effect of activating blood circulation to dissipate blood stasis and improve blood circulation. However, its effects on microcirculation in patients with AMI after primary PCI remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of extract (TPE) on improving microcirculation and outcomes in patients with AMI after PCI.
Methods: This study included 155 patients with a history of emergency PCI treatment. In this cohort, 31 patients received a course of TPE, defined as intravenous TPE infusion (12 ml TPE dissolved in 250 ml 5% Glucose Injection) once daily for 7 days on the background of standard treatment after PCI; 124 who did not receive TPE were regarded as the control group and received standard treatment after PCI. The corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (CTFC) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) were used to evaluate myocardial microcirculation. Cardiac function was measured by echocardiography during hospitalization and follow-up. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were recorded for prognostic analysis.
Results: At the 6-month follow-up, AMI patients who received TPE after primary PCI had significantly lower levels of CTCF (24.27 ± 2.40 vs. 21.88 ± 1.92,  < 0.001) and IMR (20.02 ± 2.20 vs. 17.80 ± 2.11,  < 0.001) than patients in the control group. Left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular internal dimension at systolic at 6-month follow-up in the TPE group significantly improved than in the control group (56.6 ± 4.5 vs. 62.1 ± 3.5,  < 0.001; 32.5 ± 1.5 vs. 30.2 ± 1.8,  < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis indicated that patients with AMI who received TPE had significantly lower rates of MACEs than the control group at 6-month follow-up ( = 0.042).
Conclusion: In the context of standard treatment, further improved coronary microcirculation, increased cardiac function, and reduced short-term MACEs rate. Our data suggest that TPE could be used in combination therapy for patients with AMI after primary PCI.

Keywords

References

  1. Circulation. 2001 Nov 27;104(22):2746-53 [PMID: 11723030]
  2. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec;10(12): [PMID: 29222132]
  3. J Tradit Chin Med. 2017 Feb;37(1):1-11 [PMID: 29956895]
  4. Front Physiol. 2018 Jan 17;8:1132 [PMID: 29387016]
  5. Eur Heart J. 2017 Feb 14;38(7):478-488 [PMID: 26843279]
  6. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;254:1-9 [PMID: 29407076]
  7. Biol Pharm Bull. 1996 Aug;19(8):1046-8 [PMID: 8874813]
  8. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jan 3;12(1):e027664 [PMID: 36565193]
  9. Nat Prod Res. 2021 Dec;35(23):5132-5137 [PMID: 32744101]
  10. Circulation. 2016 Jan 5;133(1):39-47 [PMID: 26555329]
  11. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2005 Jul-Aug;14(4):170-5 [PMID: 16009313]
  12. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477 [PMID: 31504439]
  13. Cardiovasc Res. 2021 Apr 23;117(5):1257-1273 [PMID: 33063086]
  14. Molecules. 2018 Sep 20;23(10): [PMID: 30241309]
  15. Phytochem Anal. 2023 Jan;34(1):40-47 [PMID: 36278832]
  16. PLoS One. 2014 May 06;9(5):e96630 [PMID: 24800739]
  17. Cardiovasc Res. 2019 Jun 1;115(7):1143-1155 [PMID: 30428011]
  18. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):879-88 [PMID: 8598078]
  19. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;8(11):1445-1453 [PMID: 26404197]
  20. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 4;7(17):e008868 [PMID: 30371178]
  21. J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 06;9(9): [PMID: 32899944]
  22. Eur Heart J. 2016 Apr 1;37(13):1024-33 [PMID: 26364289]
  23. Heart. 2019 Oct;105(20):1536-1542 [PMID: 31366574]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsTPEPCIAMImicrocirculationmyocardialgroupcoronaryinfarctiontreatmentreceivedcontrolfollow-upvs< 0001percutaneousinterventionacutebloodprimaryoutcomesstandardMACEs6-monthsignificantly5ChinesetraditionalherbeffectcirculationstudyextractimprovingIMRusedfunctioncardiacanalysislower20ventricularimprovedBackground:Microcirculatorydysfunctionindependentriskfactorpoorprognosiswell-knowndescribedactivatingdissipatestasisimproveHowevereffectsremainunknownaimedinvestigateMethods:included155historyemergencycohort31coursedefinedintravenousinfusion12 mldissolved250 ml5%GlucoseInjectiondaily7daysbackground124receiveregardedcorrectedthrombolysisframecountCTFCindexmicrocirculatoryresistanceevaluateCardiacmeasuredechocardiographyhospitalizationMajoradverseeventsrecordedprognosticResults:levelsCTCF2427 ± 2402188 ± 19202 ± 21780 ± 211Leftejectionfractionleftinternaldimensionsystolic566 ± 4621 ± 3325 ± 1302 ± 18Kaplan-Meiercurveindicatedrates = 0042Conclusion:contextincreasedreducedshort-termratedatasuggestcombinationtherapyInfluence

Similar Articles

Cited By