Acute Effects of Combining Whole-Body Electromyostimulation with Resistance Training in Active Women.

Andrea Buonsenso, Marco Centorbi, Giulia Di Martino, Carlo Della Valle, Gloria Di Claudio, Domenico Di Fonza, Erika Di Zazzo, Giuseppe Calcagno, Alessandra di Cagno, Giovanni Fiorilli
Author Information
  1. Andrea Buonsenso: Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy. ORCID
  2. Marco Centorbi: Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy. ORCID
  3. Giulia Di Martino: Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy. ORCID
  4. Carlo Della Valle: Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy. ORCID
  5. Gloria Di Claudio: Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
  6. Domenico Di Fonza: Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
  7. Erika Di Zazzo: Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy. ORCID
  8. Giuseppe Calcagno: Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy. ORCID
  9. Alessandra di Cagno: Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", 00135 Rome, Italy. ORCID
  10. Giovanni Fiorilli: Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

Strength training elicits benefits both in performance and on a psychological level in women, such as increased muscle strength and improved self-esteem. Whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) could be a training strategy for enhancing muscular strength. The aim of this study was to assess the acute effects of a single session of WB-EMS superimposed over classic resistance training on isometric strength, endurance strength and flexibility. Furthermore, the safety of the protocol was assessed by monitoring the levels of creatine kinase (CK) 48 h after the training protocol was completed. Sixteen active women (aged 22.06 ± 1.88) were randomly assigned to an experimental group (EG) ( = 8) and a control group (CG) ( = 8). The EG performed four sets of 12 repetitions of three strength exercises with superimposed WB-EMS, while the CG performed the same protocol without WB-EMS. RM-ANOVA showed a significant time*group interaction on posterior kinetic chain extensors' mean and peak strength in the EG (F = 10.036; = 0.007; and F = 20.719; < 0.001; respectively). A significant time*group interaction was found in the sit and reach test for the EG (F = 10.362; = 0.006). Finally, ANOVA performed on the CK levels showed no significant difference between the groups (F = 0.715; = 0.412). WB-EMS training led to an immediate improvement in strength performance and flexibility, and this protocol was shown to be safe in terms of CK levels, 48 h after completing the training protocol.

Keywords

References

  1. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022 Dec 20;8(1): [PMID: 36648893]
  2. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020 Nov 19;5(4): [PMID: 33467299]
  3. J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Aug;29(8):2176-85 [PMID: 25647649]
  4. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jun 15;83(12):1674-7, A7 [PMID: 10392877]
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 20;18(10): [PMID: 34065571]
  6. Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Mar 05;10:531-8 [PMID: 25767380]
  7. Hum Mov Sci. 2020 Dec;74:102686 [PMID: 33059226]
  8. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;10(5): [PMID: 35627948]
  9. Front Physiol. 2018 May 23;9:573 [PMID: 29875684]
  10. J Sci Med Sport. 2013 May;16(3):240-4 [PMID: 22819255]
  11. Front Physiol. 2019 Sep 23;10:1187 [PMID: 31607944]
  12. Sports (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;11(4): [PMID: 37104150]
  13. Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 09;10:982062 [PMID: 36159315]
  14. Front Physiol. 2019 Nov 01;10:1359 [PMID: 31736781]
  15. Front Physiol. 2019 Nov 08;10:1336 [PMID: 31780950]
  16. J Hum Kinet. 2012 Jun;33:73-9 [PMID: 23485960]
  17. Int J Cardiol. 2015 Feb 1;180:100-2 [PMID: 25438227]
  18. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Nov;33(5):404-411 [PMID: 17950406]
  19. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Dec;25(12):3391-8 [PMID: 21969080]
  20. Sports Med. 2008;38(2):161-77 [PMID: 18201117]
  21. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014 Aug;24(8):651-9 [PMID: 24946698]
  22. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Oct;104(3):463-72 [PMID: 18563434]
  23. Sports Med. 2009;39(9):765-77 [PMID: 19691365]
  24. Gerontologist. 1999 Dec;39(6):705-10 [PMID: 10650680]
  25. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Apr;25(4):516-21 [PMID: 8479307]
  26. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2015 Nov;165(21-22):427-35 [PMID: 26498468]
  27. Phys Ther. 1986 Feb;66(2):206-9 [PMID: 3945674]
  28. J Sports Sci Med. 2016 Dec 01;15(4):639-648 [PMID: 27928210]
  29. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1334-59 [PMID: 21694556]
  30. Clin Nephrol. 2013 Jan;79 Suppl 1:S12-23 [PMID: 23249528]
  31. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Jan;12(1):106-114 [PMID: 27140680]
  32. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Feb 09;15:1086487 [PMID: 36845654]
  33. Front Physiol. 2019 Jun 27;10:728 [PMID: 31316389]
  34. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jul;22(4):1360-70 [PMID: 18545166]
  35. Biol Sport. 2022 Mar;39(2):451-461 [PMID: 35309538]
  36. Am J Health Promot. 1992 May-Jun;6(5):338-44, 371 [PMID: 10146790]
  37. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Apr;98(4):414-8 [PMID: 9550163]
  38. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jul;24(7):1880-7 [PMID: 20555279]
  39. Sports Med. 2000 Oct;30(4):249-68 [PMID: 11048773]
  40. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2011 Oct 17;1(3): [PMID: 23882330]
  41. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(1):48-57 [PMID: 24870059]
  42. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Dec;20(10):1094-100 [PMID: 16129528]
  43. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2020 Feb;71(1): [PMID: 32554843]
  44. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Sep;98(2):202-11 [PMID: 16944193]
  45. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998;77(1-2):170-5 [PMID: 9459538]
  46. J Hand Ther. 2017 Jan - Mar;30(1):13-19 [PMID: 27823901]
  47. Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Nov;25(6):e71-3 [PMID: 25353720]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0=strengthtrainingWB-EMSprotocol0levelsCKEGFperformedsignificantperformancewomenelectromyostimulationsuperimposedisometricflexibility48hactivegroup8CGshowedtime*groupinteraction10Strengthelicitsbenefitspsychologicallevelincreasedmuscleimprovedself-esteemWhole-bodystrategyenhancingmuscularaimstudyassessacuteeffectssinglesessionclassicresistanceenduranceFurthermoresafetyassessedmonitoringcreatinekinasecompletedSixteenaged2206±188randomlyassignedexperimentalcontrolfoursets12repetitionsthreeexerciseswithoutRM-ANOVAposteriorkineticchainextensors'meanpeak03600720719<001respectivelyfoundsitreachtest362006FinallyANOVAdifferencegroups715412ledimmediateimprovementshownsafetermscompletingAcuteEffectsCombiningWhole-BodyElectromyostimulationResistanceTrainingActiveWomenwomanwholebody

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)