Greenhouse gas emissions from US irrigation pumping and implications for climate-smart irrigation policy.

Avery W Driscoll, Richard T Conant, Landon T Marston, Eunkyoung Choi, Nathaniel D Mueller
Author Information
  1. Avery W Driscoll: Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. averywdriscoll@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Richard T Conant: Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  3. Landon T Marston: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA. ORCID
  4. Eunkyoung Choi: Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  5. Nathaniel D Mueller: Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Irrigation reduces crop vulnerability to drought and heat stress and thus is a promising climate change adaptation strategy. However, irrigation also produces greenhouse gas emissions through pump energy use. To assess potential conflicts between adaptive irrigation expansion and agricultural emissions mitigation efforts, we calculated county-level emissions from irrigation energy use in the US using fuel expenditures, prices, and emissions factors. Irrigation pump energy use produced 12.6 million metric tonnes COe in the US in 2018 (90% CI: 10.4, 15.0), predominantly attributable to groundwater pumping. Groundwater reliance, irrigated area extent, water demand, fuel choice, and electrical grid emissions intensity drove spatial heterogeneity in emissions. Due to heavy reliance on electrical pumps, projected reductions in electrical grid emissions intensity are estimated to reduce pumping emissions by 46% by 2050, with further reductions possible through pump electrification. Quantification of irrigation-related emissions will enable targeted emissions reduction efforts and climate-smart irrigation expansion.

References

  1. Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Oct 7;48(19):11100-8 [PMID: 25158047]
  2. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2020 Dec 4;125(12): [PMID: 33552823]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):20260-4 [PMID: 22106295]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 10;110(37):E3477-86 [PMID: 23980153]
  5. Science. 2018 Aug 24;361(6404):748-750 [PMID: 30139857]
  6. Nat Food. 2021 Jul;2(7):494-501 [PMID: 37117684]
  7. Nat Food. 2020 Feb;1(2):94-97 [PMID: 37128000]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 25;105(47):18215-20 [PMID: 19015510]
  9. Glob Chang Biol. 2020 May;26(5):3065-3078 [PMID: 32167221]
  10. Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Dec;24(12):5948-5960 [PMID: 30295393]
  11. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(15):8897-904 [PMID: 24963828]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 2;117(22):11856-11858 [PMID: 32430321]
  13. Science. 2013 Feb 22;339(6122):940-3 [PMID: 23430651]
  14. Science. 2020 Nov 6;370(6517):705-708 [PMID: 33154139]
  15. Nat Food. 2021 Mar;2(3):198-209 [PMID: 37117443]
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 24;117(47):29526-29534 [PMID: 33168728]
  17. Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Dec 1;54(23):15329-15337 [PMID: 33186025]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0emissionsirrigationpumpenergyuseUSpumpingelectricalIrrigationgasexpansioneffortsfuelreliancegridintensityreductionsclimate-smartreducescropvulnerabilitydroughtheatstressthuspromisingclimatechangeadaptationstrategyHoweveralsoproducesgreenhouseassesspotentialconflictsadaptiveagriculturalmitigationcalculatedcounty-levelusingexpenditurespricesfactorsproduced126millionmetrictonnesCOe201890%CI:104150predominantlyattributablegroundwaterGroundwaterirrigatedareaextentwaterdemandchoicedrovespatialheterogeneityDueheavypumpsprojectedestimatedreduce46%2050possibleelectrificationQuantificationirrigation-relatedwillenabletargetedreductionGreenhouseimplicationspolicy

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)