Effect of Climatic Condition, Type of Trough and Water Cleanliness on Drinking Behavior in Dairy Cows.

Franziska Katharina Burkhardt, Jason Jeremia Hayer, Céline Heinemann, Julia Steinhoff-Wagner
Author Information
  1. Franziska Katharina Burkhardt: TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany. ORCID
  2. Jason Jeremia Hayer: Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany. ORCID
  3. Céline Heinemann: Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany. ORCID
  4. Julia Steinhoff-Wagner: TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany. ORCID

Abstract

Increasing ambient temperatures lead to higher water intake and higher risks of microbial growth in cattle troughs. This study aims to analyze drinking water quality and dairy cows' drinking behavior ( = 8081 drinking episodes) on a commercial farm with 135 and 144 lactating cows in two climatic conditions, considering trough type and cleanliness, respectively. Daily video recording was conducted at two trough types (two open troughs, 70 L; two-valve troughs, variable volume of 5-15 L) in the first two hours after feeding ( = 60 days in total) under cold (December 2019-February 2020) and warm ambient temperatures (September 2021). The trough cleaning scheme allowed cows to access either cleaned or uncleaned troughs in each system. Water quality was tested daily and analyzed at the beginning and end of the trials. In warmer ambient temperatures, fewer and-at uncleaned troughs and open troughs-shorter drinking episodes were recorded, with longer but fewer water intake periods, longer drinking breaks, and fewer sips ( < 0.0001). Considering the drinking episodes, respectively, water intake and drinking breaks in number and duration, the number of sips and the number of agonistic behaviors might optimize dairy cow water supply and hygiene management.

Keywords

References

  1. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2017 Dec;101(6):1076-1092 [PMID: 27862389]
  2. J Dairy Sci. 1990 Apr;73(4):1091-9 [PMID: 2345198]
  3. J Anim Sci. 2022 May 1;100(5): [PMID: 35390153]
  4. J Dairy Sci. 2013 Feb;96(2):1164-76 [PMID: 23245965]
  5. J Dairy Sci. 1994 Jan;77(1):132-44 [PMID: 8120182]
  6. J Anim Sci. 1970 Nov;31(5):973-81 [PMID: 4921246]
  7. J Anim Sci. 2020 Jan 1;98(1): [PMID: 31875908]
  8. J Anim Sci. 1971 Jul;33(1):72-6 [PMID: 5571091]
  9. J Dairy Sci. 2012 Oct;95(10):5694-701 [PMID: 22921625]
  10. J Dairy Sci. 2001 Aug;84(8):1856-62 [PMID: 11518311]
  11. Anim Front. 2018 Nov 10;9(1):47-53 [PMID: 32002239]
  12. J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3447-3458 [PMID: 32008780]
  13. J Dairy Sci. 2005 Jan;88(1):71-85 [PMID: 15591369]
  14. J Dairy Sci. 2008 Sep;91(9):3385-94 [PMID: 18765597]
  15. J Anim Sci. 2011 Jan;89(1):245-51 [PMID: 20870953]
  16. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 2013 Feb 1;138(2):86-97, 99 [PMID: 23457917]
  17. Animal. 2010 Jan;4(1):116-21 [PMID: 22443625]
  18. J Anim Sci. 2006 May;84(5):1252-8 [PMID: 16612029]
  19. J Dairy Sci. 2008 Jun;91(6):2257-64 [PMID: 18487648]

Grants

  1. UBO 53C- 50023-00-71030002/Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0drinkingwatertroughsambienttwotroughtemperaturesintakequalityepisodesfewernumberhigherdairy=cowsrespectivelyopenLcleaninguncleanedWaterlongerbreakssipsIncreasingleadrisksmicrobialgrowthcattlestudyaimsanalyzecows'behavior8081commercialfarm135144lactatingclimaticconditionsconsideringtypecleanlinessDailyvideorecordingconductedtypes70two-valvevariablevolume5-15firsthoursfeeding60daystotalcoldDecember2019-February2020warmSeptember2021schemeallowedaccesseithercleanedsystemtesteddailyanalyzedbeginningendtrialswarmerand-attroughs-shorterrecordedperiods<00001ConsideringdurationagonisticbehaviorsmightoptimizecowsupplyhygienemanagementEffectClimaticConditionTypeTroughCleanlinessDrinkingBehaviorDairyCowstemperaturelivestockconsumption

Similar Articles

Cited By